Survey rewards
Reward survey takers for their participation while simultaneously increasing your survey response rates.
Survey rewards are the incentives you offer participants in exchange for their valuable time and candid feedback.
They are a powerful tool used to dramatically boost response rates, help you reach niche or harder-to-find audiences, and immediately acknowledge that a respondent's time matters. The core goal is to maximize participation without sacrificing the quality of the data you collect.
Rewards work by pairing an invitation with a clear benefit. After being invited, screened, and completing the survey, the respondent receives the incentive.
Rewards generally fall into two categories: Direct rewards, like cash or digital gift cards, go straight to the participant. Indirect rewards benefit something they care about, such as a charitable donation made in their name.
In this guide, you’ll learn the pros and cons, whether survey rewards are appropriate for you, and the types of rewards for surveys.
The pros and cons of incentivizing with survey rewards
Offering rewards for surveys can strengthen participation, but it introduces tradeoffs that matter for study design and data quality.
Pros of survey rewards
When used thoughtfully, survey rewards are a powerful investment that delivers better data and higher returns.
- Boost response rates: Incentives are crucial for driving completion, especially for longer, more complex, or more demanding surveys.
- Access niche audiences: Rewards help you successfully engage harder-to-find participants, such as busy professionals, niche market segments, or low-incidence groups.
- Signal respect and appreciation: Offering a reward immediately signals that you value the respondent's time and thoughtful input.
By carefully matching the reward type and value to your specific audience and survey topic, you can offer survey incentives without sacrificing good data.
Cons of survey rewards
While incentives are powerful for boosting participation, they introduce a few risks. The good news is that each risk can be effectively managed with basic controls.
Here are the risks:
- Low-effort answers (satisficing): This happens when people speed through questions or provide random answers simply to collect the reward. This results in poor-quality data.
- Fraud and off-target respondents: High cash incentives can attract individuals who don't actually fit your target profile or who try to take the survey multiple times just to earn the reward.
- Conditioning repeat samples: If you regularly reward the same audience for every survey, you train them to expect an incentive every single time you ask for feedback, potentially limiting future un-incentivized research.
Don’t let the cons stop you in your tracks. Satisficing can be frustrating, and off-target respondents are downright obstructive, but you can successfully reduce the risks of using survey rewards by implementing simple quality control measures:
- Filter before entry (screeners): Use strong screeners to confirm that people meet your target criteria before they are allowed to complete the main survey.
- Catch low-effort responses: Add attention checks to immediately flag and filter out low-effort or random responses.
- Balance your sample: Choose a sampling type that makes sense for your study to keep your sample balanced, prevent over-sampling, and remove repeat respondents.
- Secure high-value incentives: When incentives are higher-value, limit open survey links and use unique, secure invites or trusted research panels instead.
- Match effort to reward: Right-size the reward to accurately match the survey’s length and the level of effort required from the participant.
When survey rewards are not a good fit
Considering the pros and cons, rewards are not always the best solution. They are generally not a good fit when intrinsic motivation is already strong, participation is ensured by an authority, or the survey is extremely short.
| Scenario | Why rewards are unnecessary |
| High intrinsic interest | People already deeply care about the topic (e.g., neighbors giving input on a local park). Their desire to share feedback is motivation enough, making rewards redundant. |
| Authority contexts | Participation is already expected or required (e.g., course evaluations, mandatory employee policy surveys). The existing structure ensures a high response rate without added incentives. |
| Very short or transactional surveys | For one- or two-question check-ins, the time commitment is minimal. Adding rewards often slows down logistics and doesn't meaningfully boost response rates. |
| Frequent surveys of the same group | In ongoing pulse surveys or recurring feedback programs, constant incentives can 'train' participants to view their input as a paid task rather than meaningful participation. |
Best practice: Save rewards for occasional, higher-effort studies where you truly need to encourage participation, and rely on intrinsic motivation for your frequent, ongoing feedback programs.
Before you offer survey rewards, ask these questions
Survey rewards can certainly boost participation, but before you set a budget or choose an incentive, it’s critical to determine if one is truly necessary. Considering these four questions helps you understand whether a reward aligns with your audience, topic, and effort required.
- Who is your target population? If you can already reach the right people easily, a small incentive is a reasonable "thank you." If the survey is open to a very broad audience, high-value rewards increase the risk of attracting irrelevant respondents.
- What is your existing relationship with respondents? Existing customers who asked for product feedback may need a small nudge to make time for it. In structured or authority settings (such as employees or students), people often respond out of obligation and may not need incentives.
- Are people already intrinsically interested in the topic? When people genuinely care about the issue (e.g., local community input), they are already highly motivated to participate without rewards. In this case, incentives add more complexity than value.
- How long and demanding is the survey? Very short, simple check-ins rarely need incentives. Longer, more complex questionnaires that ask for significant time and effort are much stronger candidates for a reward.
How survey rewards work
Survey rewards follow a structured, transparent process from the initial invitation to final redemption. Understanding these steps helps you manage expectations and build trust with participants.
- Receive the invitation: A person is invited to take the survey directly (e.g., via email) or discovers it through a trusted panel or promotional recruitment message.
- Review reward details: They clearly see what the incentive is, who is eligible to participate, and any necessary terms and conditions.
- Confirm eligibility: They complete short screener or profiling questions to ensure they are the right fit for the study.
- Complete the survey: Once qualified, they answer all required questions and reach the official completion page.
- Earn or reach threshold, if applicable: In points-based programs, they accumulate points until they reach the minimum required amount for redemption.
- Redeem and receive reward: After meeting all requirements, they redeem or receive their reward (such as a digital gift card, charitable donation, or raffle entry) and get a confirmation message or email.
Always summarize this process in your invitation and on the introductory page of your survey. Setting clear expectations upfront minimizes support questions and immediately helps you build trust with your respondents.
Direct survey rewards
Direct survey rewards are incentives given individually to every qualified respondent, such as cash, digital gift cards, or loyalty points. For rewards aimed at existing customers, always focus on options that feel like a genuine thank-you for their time rather than a simple payment.
To ensure success with direct rewards, focus on selecting an incentive that genuinely appeals to your audience and strictly manage your budget by setting clear response limits and ensuring full legal compliance before launch.
Types of direct rewards
Direct reward types include monetary payments, digital gift cards, points, and sweepstakes, each with different benefits and risks.
Upfront, guaranteed incentives like survey money and digital gift cards often lift response rates more than points or sweepstakes, but they require stronger fraud and quality controls. The table below summarizes the main pros and cons.
| Reward type | Pros | Cons |
| Monetary payment | Very strong motivator; easy to understand and compare | Higher fraud and satisficing risk; requires more verification |
| Digital gift cards | Familiar; easy to distribute globally | Code inventory management; occasional delivery failures |
| Points | Flexible value over time; good for ongoing programs | Slower gratification; requires tracking system |
| Sweepstakes | Lower cost per complete; simple for large samples | Lower motivation for some audiences; legal disclosures required |
Picking the right incentive
You can use incentives more intentionally by matching them to who you’re surveying, how long the survey is, and how sensitive the topic feels. Use this matrix as a starting point, then adjust for your incidence rate, budget, and any panel or program norms.
| Audience type | Survey length | Sensitivity | Suggested incentive direction | If/then guidance |
| General population | Short (3–5 minutes) | Low | Small gift card or sweepstakes; sometimes none | If short + low-stakes, then light or no incentive. |
| General population | Long (10–20+ minutes) | Low | Larger gift card or points | If long + low-stakes, then higher-value reward. |
| General population | Short (3–5 minutes) | High | Neutral, lower-value reward or indirect incentive | If short + sensitive, then small, privacy-safe incentive. |
| General population | Long (10–20+ minutes) | High | Moderate, neutral gift card with clear privacy language | If long + sensitive, then fair reward + strong privacy messaging. |
| Niche or hard-to-reach | Short (3–5 minutes) | Low | Small, guaranteed gift card or points | If niche + short, then guarantee incentive to secure completion. |
| Niche or hard-to-reach | Long (10–20+ minutes) | Low | Higher-value gift card or monetary payment | If niche + long, then higher-value reward + stronger controls. |
| Niche or hard-to-reach | Short (3–5 minutes) | High | Neutral, guaranteed incentive | If niche + sensitive + short, then guaranteed, neutral reward. |
| Niche or hard-to-reach | Long (10–20+ minutes) | High | Higher neutral reward with strong quality controls | If niche + sensitive + long, then higher reward + robust privacy and fraud checks. |
Delivery best practices
Reliable delivery is central to maintaining trust. Many teams use instant-delivery systems for digital codes, while others batch-fulfill rewards after validating completion. Common workflow elements include:
- Decide between instant and batch delivery. Instant rewards at completion can improve the respondent experience but require real-time systems. Batch fulfillment (for example, weekly or after fieldwork closes) gives you time to run quality checks first.
- Manage reward codes and inventory. Track how many codes you have, how many have been sent, and when they expire so you don’t run out mid-study.
- Plan for failed deliveries. Set up simple flows for bounced emails, invalid addresses, or expired links, like an alternate contact method or a short support form.
- Set support expectations. Let respondents know where to go if something goes wrong with their reward and how long it typically takes to resolve. A short note on the thank-you or completion page can reduce confusion.
If you’re using your own coupons, discounts, or offers, you can also tie rewards directly to your site or app. See how to redirect to your own coupon or offer after completion in the Help Center.
Indirect survey rewards
Indirect survey rewards are incentives that benefit a cause or a third party rather than the individual respondent.
They’re helpful when you want participation to feel more like contributing than “getting paid,” or when you’re trying to reduce people who only show up for a prize. Indirect rewards can attract people who care about the topic or cause and are motivated by impact rather than compensation.
When indirect beats direct
Indirect rewards outperform direct incentives when topics are sensitive, fraud risk is high, or brand alignment and goodwill matter most.
- The topic is sensitive. For issues like health, finances, or workplace culture, linking responses to a relevant cause can feel more respectful than paying people directly.
- You want brand-aligned causes. Directing donations to charities or initiatives that align with your mission can reinforce your brand values and make participation feel meaningful.
- You need to reduce fraud and satisficing. When there’s no personal payout, it’s less attractive for people who only want to game incentives.
- Goodwill matters more than speed. In community, academic, or mission-driven work, it may be better to attract fewer but more thoughtful respondents, even if completions come in more slowly.
Ways to implement indirect incentives
Indirect survey incentives can be implemented through charity donations, summaries, early access, or branded perks. The right mix depends on your audience, budget, and how closely you want the reward to tie to your brand or cause. Each option gives you a way to acknowledge participation without emphasizing monetary exchange.
- Charity per complete. Donate a fixed amount on the respondent’s behalf for every qualified, completed survey. A survey response program like SurveyMonkey Contribute is one example of this model.
- Access to a results summary. Offer a short, anonymized summary of key findings as a thank-you, especially for professional or community audiences.
- Early product or feature access. Provide first access to a beta feature, new content, or a waitlisted program instead of a cash-equivalent reward.
- Branded swag. Give low-cost items or digital perks with capped cost, such as discount codes, small freebies, or event access for engaged communities.
Indirect rewards can signal higher quality
Indirect rewards often produce higher-quality responses because participants are motivated by the topic or cause rather than personal gain.
- People who respond without a personal payout are often more motivated by the topic or cause, which can reduce satisficing and low-effort answers.
- Charitable or mission-linked rewards can attract respondents who are willing to spend more time on open-ended questions or detailed feedback.
There are tradeoffs. Indirect rewards may lead to slower response times or smaller sample sizes than high-value direct incentives, and screeners and attention checks are still needed. But when quality, alignment with your values, or fraud reduction are priorities, indirect rewards can be a strong alternative to paying every respondent directly.
Strengthen your survey rewards strategy
Survey rewards work best when they’re intentional, transparent, and aligned with your goals. Clear terms, thoughtful incentive choices, and reliable delivery build trust and protect data quality. Whether you use direct or indirect rewards, the right structure helps you gather more meaningful responses without incurring unnecessary costs or risks.
Use these principles to design reward surveys that motivate participation and support confident, insight-driven decisions.
See how SurveyMonkey can power your curiosity
Discover more resources
Solutions for your role
SurveyMonkey can help you do your job better. Discover how to make a bigger impact with winning strategies, products, experiences, and more.
Travel survey questions: 40+ examples to improve guest and traveler feedback
Use these 40+ travel survey questions and templates to collect feedback, boost guest satisfaction, and improve every traveller’s experience.
When you need to ask follow-up questions
Follow-up questions are a great tool to gather more insightful, specific data from surveys. Here's how and when you need to ask follow up questions.
The pros and cons of survey prizes
Explore the pros and cons of offering survey prizes, assess whether you need them, and learn best practices for using survey incentives effectively.