Introduction

The following survey is intended to gain insight into faculty current perceptions, use, and needs related to Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a step in creating a framework and support for addressing this evolving topic at Valparaiso University. The survey is composed of demographic questions along with questions and statements on perceptions, use, and needs related to AI. Participation in this survey is voluntary. All responses will be kept completely confidential. While it is necessary in some instances to know characteristics of participants, identifying information will not be shared with the institution or the public.
Demographic Information

Question Title

* Sex

Question Title

* Age

Question Title

* Race (check all the apply)

Question Title

* Primary Academic Area

Question Title

* Current Role

Question Title

* Level of Education

Question Title

* I have worked in this organization for:

Question Title

* The types of courses I generally teach include (check all that apply):

Question Title

* Which statement best describes your current syllabus language about student use of AI in your courses?

Perceptions Regarding Generative AI

The following statements provide insight into your perceptions of AI in teaching and learning, as a workplace tool, and overall societal impact.

Question Title

* Faculty Perceptions on Generative AI Impact on Students

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Slightly Disagree Neutral/No Opinion Slightly Agree Agree Strongly Agree
AI allows students to focus more on critical thinking.
AI harms student learning by reducing critical thinking.
AI leads to poor learning outcomes.
AI is a powerful coaching tool for students.
AI can enhance student learning.
Students are already well-informed about AI.
AI harms students learning by reducing engagement.
AI is a necessary skill for students to learn for their careers.
It is the University's responsibility to educate students on the implications of AI.

Question Title

* Perceptions on Generative AI as a Faculty Member

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Slightly Disagree Neutral/ No Opinion Slightly Agree Agree Strongly Agree
AI reduces my time spent on administrative tasks.
I am well informed about AI.
AI harms me by taking away my agency.
I am overwhelmed by AI.
AI increases productivity.
AI increases creativity.
AI is useful for creating course content (i.e., case studies, assignments).
AI is detrimental to the environment.
AI poses serious ethical concerns.
It can be beneficial for faculty to use AI for instruction.
I feel student use of AI can be beneficial to the learning process.

Question Title

* Please add any additional comments you feel would supplement your answers related to your perceptions of Generative AI:

Use of Generative AI

The following statements challenge you to think about your perceptions of how students currently use AI and your own use, or non-use, of AI.

Question Title

* Generative AI Use by Students

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Slightly Disagree Neutral/ No Opinion Slightly agree Agree Strongly Agree
Students use AI regularly for multiple purposes (academic and/or non-academic).
Students use AI to cheat.
Student use AI as a shorcut.
Students use AI as a coach or enhancement.
Student use AI due to feeling overwhelmed.
Students use AI to enhance critical thinking.
Students use AI to avoid what they consider "busy" work.
I am confident in students' ability to use AI effectively.

Question Title

* I use AI in some way related to my teaching.

T