Health Equity Rounds 21: Artificial Intelligence - HER 21 Team - Seattle Children's

03/11/2026

At the completion of this program, the participant will be able to:

1. Recognize how AI is being used at our institution and in health care.

2. Discuss equity considerations in the development of AI.

3. Discuss equity considerations in the implementation of AI.

4. Identify equity-based approaches to the use of AI

Question Title

* 1. First Name:

Question Title

* 2. Last Name:

Question Title

* 3. Preferred Pronouns:

Question Title

* 4. NABP e-Profile ID# (required in order to receive credit):

Question Title

* 5. DOB Month and Date -ex.: April 4th is 0404 (required in order to receive credit):

Question Title

* 6. Member or Registration Type:

Question Title

* 7. Secret Code:

Question Title

* 8. Email Address:

Question Title

* 9. Please Rate the Activity and Faculty: Sejal Jain

	Excellent	Very Good	Average	Fair	Poor
Met activity stated objectives listed above	Met activity stated objectives listed above Excellent	Met activity stated objectives listed above Very Good	Met activity stated objectives listed above Average	Met activity stated objectives listed above Fair	Met activity stated objectives listed above Poor
Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Excellent	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Very Good	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Average	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Fair	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Poor
Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Excellent	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Very Good	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Average	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Fair	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Poor
Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Excellent	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Very Good	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Average	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Fair	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Poor
Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Excellent	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Very Good	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Average	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Fair	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Poor
Educational materials were useful and valuable	Educational materials were useful and valuable Excellent	Educational materials were useful and valuable Very Good	Educational materials were useful and valuable Average	Educational materials were useful and valuable Fair	Educational materials were useful and valuable Poor
Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Excellent	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Very Good	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Average	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Fair	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Poor
Overall speaker rating	Overall speaker rating Excellent	Overall speaker rating Very Good	Overall speaker rating Average	Overall speaker rating Fair	Overall speaker rating Poor

If you rated any evaluation question as 2 (below average/disagree) or 1 (poor/strongly disagree), please explain:

Question Title

* 10. Please Rate the Activity and Faculty: Mimi Garmella

	Excellent	Very Good	Average	Fair	Poor
Met activity stated objectives listed above	Met activity stated objectives listed above Excellent	Met activity stated objectives listed above Very Good	Met activity stated objectives listed above Average	Met activity stated objectives listed above Fair	Met activity stated objectives listed above Poor
Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Excellent	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Very Good	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Average	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Fair	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Poor
Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Excellent	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Very Good	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Average	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Fair	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Poor
Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Excellent	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Very Good	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Average	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Fair	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Poor
Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Excellent	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Very Good	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Average	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Fair	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Poor
Educational materials were useful and valuable	Educational materials were useful and valuable Excellent	Educational materials were useful and valuable Very Good	Educational materials were useful and valuable Average	Educational materials were useful and valuable Fair	Educational materials were useful and valuable Poor
Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Excellent	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Very Good	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Average	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Fair	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Poor
Overall speaker rating	Overall speaker rating Excellent	Overall speaker rating Very Good	Overall speaker rating Average	Overall speaker rating Fair	Overall speaker rating Poor

If you rated any evaluation question as 2 (below average/disagree) or 1 (poor/strongly disagree), please explain:

Question Title

* 11. Please Rate the Activity and Faculty: Sully Sullivan

	Excellent	Very Good	Average	Fair	Poor
Met activity stated objectives listed above	Met activity stated objectives listed above Excellent	Met activity stated objectives listed above Very Good	Met activity stated objectives listed above Average	Met activity stated objectives listed above Fair	Met activity stated objectives listed above Poor
Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Excellent	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Very Good	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Average	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Fair	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Poor
Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Excellent	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Very Good	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Average	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Fair	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Poor
Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Excellent	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Very Good	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Average	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Fair	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Poor
Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Excellent	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Very Good	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Average	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Fair	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Poor
Educational materials were useful and valuable	Educational materials were useful and valuable Excellent	Educational materials were useful and valuable Very Good	Educational materials were useful and valuable Average	Educational materials were useful and valuable Fair	Educational materials were useful and valuable Poor
Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Excellent	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Very Good	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Average	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Fair	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Poor
Overall speaker rating	Overall speaker rating Excellent	Overall speaker rating Very Good	Overall speaker rating Average	Overall speaker rating Fair	Overall speaker rating Poor

If you rated any evaluation question as 2 (below average/disagree) or 1 (poor/strongly disagree), please explain:

Question Title

* 12. Please Rate the Activity and Faculty: Yasmeen Alayli

	Excellent	Very Good	Average	Fair	Poor
Met activity stated objectives listed above	Met activity stated objectives listed above Excellent	Met activity stated objectives listed above Very Good	Met activity stated objectives listed above Average	Met activity stated objectives listed above Fair	Met activity stated objectives listed above Poor
Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Excellent	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Very Good	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Average	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Fair	Content of this activity was relevant to my current practice needs Poor
Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Excellent	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Very Good	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Average	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Fair	Speaker was effective in portraying knowledge of subject matter Poor
Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Excellent	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Very Good	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Average	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Fair	Speaker was effective in maintaining audience engagement Poor
Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Excellent	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Very Good	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Average	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Fair	Speaker used an appropriate learning assessment (ie. self-assessment questions, break out groups, case discussions) to gauge my learning Poor
Educational materials were useful and valuable	Educational materials were useful and valuable Excellent	Educational materials were useful and valuable Very Good	Educational materials were useful and valuable Average	Educational materials were useful and valuable Fair	Educational materials were useful and valuable Poor
Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Excellent	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Very Good	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Average	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Fair	Intention on applying the new knowledge or skill gained to change current practice within the next 6 months Poor
Overall speaker rating	Overall speaker rating Excellent	Overall speaker rating Very Good	Overall speaker rating Average	Overall speaker rating Fair	Overall speaker rating Poor

If you rated any evaluation question as 2 (below average/disagree) or 1 (poor/strongly disagree), please explain:

Question Title

* 13. Were the activities presented in a fair and unbiased manner?

Yes

Question Title

* 14. If not, please describe the situation:

Question Title

* 15. Is there a skill set or knowledge area in your practice that you need more training?

Question Title

* 16. Additional Comments:

Question Title

* 17. Some major equity-related concerns with artificial intelligence include:

Biases in data training

Perpetuation of existing inequities during implementation

Confidentiality and susceptibility to breaches

All of the above

Question Title

* 18. Bias can be introduced at various points of model development. Examples include:

Historical bias, where we can generate harmful outcomes by reflecting past societal stereotypes present in the data

Representation bias, if we start with data which fails to adequately represent the intended user population also leads to poor generalization (i.e. models from adults are then used in pediatric settings)

Learning bias occurs during the training phase when data gaps affect outcomes in an inequitable way

All of the above

Question Title

* 19. Biases with implementation of AI tools include:

Sample selection bias, when real-world patient cohort differs from patients in the data set

End user bias

Medical Large Language Models (LLMs) that are trained on biased content could reproduce biased content

All of the above

Question Title

* 20. Some equity-based approaches to the use of AI in healthcare include:

Having a healthy algorithmic suspicion. Ask: who was in the training data?

Mindful usage, knowing the cost of AI. Ask: is AI actually the right tool for this task, or is clinical judgment faster and more appropriate?

Inclusive prompting. The way we ask questions matters - intentionally frame prompts to avoid reinforcing cultural bias or medical stereotypes.

Apply HIPAA principle of only sharing the minimum necessary information, checking if the AI system is secure and whether any data is being stored or reused.

Maintain a human-in-the-loop workflow. AI should be treated as an assistant, but the clinician should conduct the final clinical validation.

Report the misfires to help improve systems and protect future patients.

All of the above