What Publishing Stakeholders Really Think About AI-Assisted Peer Review?

Who Should Take This Survey?
This survey is designed for individuals directly or indirectly involved in the peer review and publishing process. Your unique perspective will help inform how AI can be responsibly and effectively integrated into scholarly publishing.
  • Peer Reviewers
  • Editors
  • Authors
  • Research Institutions and Universities
  • Publisher Staff and Journal Managers
  • AI Ethicists and Policy Makers
Participation is voluntary, the study findings will be shared on open access forums and/or presented on global platforms. Your responses are anonymous and reported only in aggregate. 5 respondents sharing exceptional and well-detailed responses stand a chance to win $25 Amazon Vouchers.

Survey Purpose

Your responses will help us better understand how AI is currently being used—or not used—in the peer review process, and how it can be improved. Specifically, the survey aims to:

  1. Understand AI Usage in Peer Review
    Gain a clear picture of how AI tools are being used within peer review workflows and which features help or hinder.
  2. Identify Barriers to Adoption
    Explore the concerns, hesitations, and practical challenges that peer reviewers and editors face when considering AI tools and/or their use for peer review.
  3. Inform Ethical and Policy Guidelines
    Gather insights into the ethical considerations and expectations that should guide publishers, editors, and developers when implementing AI in peer review.
  4. Highlight Training and Support Needs
    Uncover gaps in AI literacy and identify areas where clearer communication, training, or institutional support could build trust and confidence in these tools.
Current Progress,
0 of 29 answered