2025 Signatory Survey

Welcome

Dear signatories,

As SLCP works to continuously enhance both its reach and its methods, your feedback is crucial in helping us assess our progress, identify areas for improvement, and plan strategically for the upcoming year.

Please take a few minutes to complete the survey by September 12th, 2025. Please note that we require ONE survey to be completed by each signatory. Please ensure that your entry represents the views of your organization as a whole.

Thank you in advance for helping us improve our performance.

SLCP

Question Title

* 1. Please list your details below:

Name *

Company *

Job title/function of person completing survey:

Email address of person completing survey: *

Program & Organization

Question Title

* 2. How would you rate SLCP’s performance on the following areas, from 1 (lowest) to 10 (highest)?

	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
Clear vision & mission	Clear vision & mission 1	Clear vision & mission 2	Clear vision & mission 3	Clear vision & mission 4	Clear vision & mission 5	Clear vision & mission 6	Clear vision & mission 7	Clear vision & mission 8	Clear vision & mission 9	Clear vision & mission 10
Effective governance	Effective governance 1	Effective governance 2	Effective governance 3	Effective governance 4	Effective governance 5	Effective governance 6	Effective governance 7	Effective governance 8	Effective governance 9	Effective governance 10
Consultation & engagement with signatories	Consultation & engagement with signatories 1	Consultation & engagement with signatories 2	Consultation & engagement with signatories 3	Consultation & engagement with signatories 4	Consultation & engagement with signatories 5	Consultation & engagement with signatories 6	Consultation & engagement with signatories 7	Consultation & engagement with signatories 8	Consultation & engagement with signatories 9	Consultation & engagement with signatories 10
Transparency in decision-making	Transparency in decision-making 1	Transparency in decision-making 2	Transparency in decision-making 3	Transparency in decision-making 4	Transparency in decision-making 5	Transparency in decision-making 6	Transparency in decision-making 7	Transparency in decision-making 8	Transparency in decision-making 9	Transparency in decision-making 10
Impartiality & fairness	Impartiality & fairness 1	Impartiality & fairness 2	Impartiality & fairness 3	Impartiality & fairness 4	Impartiality & fairness 5	Impartiality & fairness 6	Impartiality & fairness 7	Impartiality & fairness 8	Impartiality & fairness 9	Impartiality & fairness 10
Collaboration & partnerships	Collaboration & partnerships 1	Collaboration & partnerships 2	Collaboration & partnerships 3	Collaboration & partnerships 4	Collaboration & partnerships 5	Collaboration & partnerships 6	Collaboration & partnerships 7	Collaboration & partnerships 8	Collaboration & partnerships 9	Collaboration & partnerships 10
Innovation & forward-thinking	Innovation & forward-thinking 1	Innovation & forward-thinking 2	Innovation & forward-thinking 3	Innovation & forward-thinking 4	Innovation & forward-thinking 5	Innovation & forward-thinking 6	Innovation & forward-thinking 7	Innovation & forward-thinking 8	Innovation & forward-thinking 9	Innovation & forward-thinking 10
Impact & effectiveness	Impact & effectiveness 1	Impact & effectiveness 2	Impact & effectiveness 3	Impact & effectiveness 4	Impact & effectiveness 5	Impact & effectiveness 6	Impact & effectiveness 7	Impact & effectiveness 8	Impact & effectiveness 9	Impact & effectiveness 10
Industry reputation	Industry reputation 1	Industry reputation 2	Industry reputation 3	Industry reputation 4	Industry reputation 5	Industry reputation 6	Industry reputation 7	Industry reputation 8	Industry reputation 9	Industry reputation 10
Influence & thought leadership	Influence & thought leadership 1	Influence & thought leadership 2	Influence & thought leadership 3	Influence & thought leadership 4	Influence & thought leadership 5	Influence & thought leadership 6	Influence & thought leadership 7	Influence & thought leadership 8	Influence & thought leadership 9	Influence & thought leadership 10
Future readiness	Future readiness 1	Future readiness 2	Future readiness 3	Future readiness 4	Future readiness 5	Future readiness 6	Future readiness 7	Future readiness 8	Future readiness 9	Future readiness 10

Please add any other comments you may have

Data Quality and Integrity

Question Title

* 3. To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
I trust the data in an SLCP assessment	I trust the data in an SLCP assessment Strongly Disagree	I trust the data in an SLCP assessment Disagree	I trust the data in an SLCP assessment Neutral	I trust the data in an SLCP assessment Agree	I trust the data in an SLCP assessment Strongly Agree
SLCP data is relevant and useful for my organization	SLCP data is relevant and useful for my organization Strongly Disagree	SLCP data is relevant and useful for my organization Disagree	SLCP data is relevant and useful for my organization Neutral	SLCP data is relevant and useful for my organization Agree	SLCP data is relevant and useful for my organization Strongly Agree
SLCP data is accurate; it reflects reality at the facility	SLCP data is accurate; it reflects reality at the facility Strongly Disagree	SLCP data is accurate; it reflects reality at the facility Disagree	SLCP data is accurate; it reflects reality at the facility Neutral	SLCP data is accurate; it reflects reality at the facility Agree	SLCP data is accurate; it reflects reality at the facility Strongly Agree
SLCP has effective Verification Oversight and Quality Assurance processes in place	SLCP has effective Verification Oversight and Quality Assurance processes in place Strongly Disagree	SLCP has effective Verification Oversight and Quality Assurance processes in place Disagree	SLCP has effective Verification Oversight and Quality Assurance processes in place Neutral	SLCP has effective Verification Oversight and Quality Assurance processes in place Agree	SLCP has effective Verification Oversight and Quality Assurance processes in place Strongly Agree
The quality of the data in an SLCP assessment is equal to or higher than that of other social audits	The quality of the data in an SLCP assessment is equal to or higher than that of other social audits Strongly Disagree	The quality of the data in an SLCP assessment is equal to or higher than that of other social audits Disagree	The quality of the data in an SLCP assessment is equal to or higher than that of other social audits Neutral	The quality of the data in an SLCP assessment is equal to or higher than that of other social audits Agree	The quality of the data in an SLCP assessment is equal to or higher than that of other social audits Strongly Agree
The quality of the data in an SLCP assessment is the same, no matter which Verifier Body conducted the verification	The quality of the data in an SLCP assessment is the same, no matter which Verifier Body conducted the verification Strongly Disagree	The quality of the data in an SLCP assessment is the same, no matter which Verifier Body conducted the verification Disagree	The quality of the data in an SLCP assessment is the same, no matter which Verifier Body conducted the verification Neutral	The quality of the data in an SLCP assessment is the same, no matter which Verifier Body conducted the verification Agree	The quality of the data in an SLCP assessment is the same, no matter which Verifier Body conducted the verification Strongly Agree

Please provide any comments you would like to share about SLCP's data quality and integrity in general, or to expand on your answers to any of the questions above.

Question Title

* 4. Have you included SLCP data in your reporting?

Yes, in our annual sustainability/impact reports

Yes, in other public reports

If no, why not?

HRDD & Policy

Question Title

* 5. SLCP is working towards ensuring its data can be used to comply and/or implement government regulations, such as human rights due diligence (HRDD). Do you use SLCP data for any of the following purposes? Select all that apply.

To identify human rights risks in the supply chain

To monitor and track progress on addressing human rights risks and harms

To substantiate social and labor claims made about a product

To make disclosures for (social) sustainability reporting

To assess if there are instances of forced labor in your supply chain

As part of your human rights due diligence (HRDD) policy

I don't use the data for any of the above

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 6. To what extent do you agree with the following statements:

	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Sure
The current CAF is appropriate as a foundational assessment tool to support HRDD implementation.	The current CAF is appropriate as a foundational assessment tool to support HRDD implementation. Strongly Disagree	The current CAF is appropriate as a foundational assessment tool to support HRDD implementation. Disagree	The current CAF is appropriate as a foundational assessment tool to support HRDD implementation. Neutral	The current CAF is appropriate as a foundational assessment tool to support HRDD implementation. Agree	The current CAF is appropriate as a foundational assessment tool to support HRDD implementation. Strongly Agree	The current CAF is appropriate as a foundational assessment tool to support HRDD implementation. Not Sure
The positioning of SLCP’s HRDD Toolkit is accurate.	The positioning of SLCP’s HRDD Toolkit is accurate. Strongly Disagree	The positioning of SLCP’s HRDD Toolkit is accurate. Disagree	The positioning of SLCP’s HRDD Toolkit is accurate. Neutral	The positioning of SLCP’s HRDD Toolkit is accurate. Agree	The positioning of SLCP’s HRDD Toolkit is accurate. Strongly Agree	The positioning of SLCP’s HRDD Toolkit is accurate. Not Sure
SLCP is a credible and fit for purpose MSI to support policy (HRDD) implementation.	SLCP is a credible and fit for purpose MSI to support policy (HRDD) implementation. Strongly Disagree	SLCP is a credible and fit for purpose MSI to support policy (HRDD) implementation. Disagree	SLCP is a credible and fit for purpose MSI to support policy (HRDD) implementation. Neutral	SLCP is a credible and fit for purpose MSI to support policy (HRDD) implementation. Agree	SLCP is a credible and fit for purpose MSI to support policy (HRDD) implementation. Strongly Agree	SLCP is a credible and fit for purpose MSI to support policy (HRDD) implementation. Not Sure

Communications

Question Title

* 7. SLCP has released numerous communications materials on various topics. How helpful have you found the following material?

	Not helpful	Somewhat helpful	Neutral	Helpful	Very helpful
Data quality and integrity updates in Newsflashes	Data quality and integrity updates in Newsflashes Not helpful	Data quality and integrity updates in Newsflashes Somewhat helpful	Data quality and integrity updates in Newsflashes Neutral	Data quality and integrity updates in Newsflashes Helpful	Data quality and integrity updates in Newsflashes Very helpful
HRDD Toolkit v 2.0	HRDD Toolkit v 2.0 Not helpful	HRDD Toolkit v 2.0 Somewhat helpful	HRDD Toolkit v 2.0 Neutral	HRDD Toolkit v 2.0 Helpful	HRDD Toolkit v 2.0 Very helpful
CSRD Guidance Document	CSRD Guidance Document Not helpful	CSRD Guidance Document Somewhat helpful	CSRD Guidance Document Neutral	CSRD Guidance Document Helpful	CSRD Guidance Document Very helpful
Fact sheets	Fact sheets Not helpful	Fact sheets Somewhat helpful	Fact sheets Neutral	Fact sheets Helpful	Fact sheets Very helpful
Impact Report	Impact Report Not helpful	Impact Report Somewhat helpful	Impact Report Neutral	Impact Report Helpful	Impact Report Very helpful
Case studies	Case studies Not helpful	Case studies Somewhat helpful	Case studies Neutral	Case studies Helpful	Case studies Very helpful
Webinars	Webinars Not helpful	Webinars Somewhat helpful	Webinars Neutral	Webinars Helpful	Webinars Very helpful

Comments:

Question Title

* 8. To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly agree
SLCP's messaging is clear	SLCP's messaging is clear Strongly disagree	SLCP's messaging is clear Disagree	SLCP's messaging is clear Neutral	SLCP's messaging is clear Agree	SLCP's messaging is clear Strongly agree
SLCP's messaging is consistent	SLCP's messaging is consistent Strongly disagree	SLCP's messaging is consistent Disagree	SLCP's messaging is consistent Neutral	SLCP's messaging is consistent Agree	SLCP's messaging is consistent Strongly agree
SLCP's messaging is engaging	SLCP's messaging is engaging Strongly disagree	SLCP's messaging is engaging Disagree	SLCP's messaging is engaging Neutral	SLCP's messaging is engaging Agree	SLCP's messaging is engaging Strongly agree

Question Title

* 9. How could SLCP improve its messaging? (Optional question)

Signatory Experience

Question Title

* 10. How likely are you to recommend being an SLCP Signatory to another organization?

Not likely

Somewhat likely

Neutral

Likely

Very likely

Not likely

Somewhat likely

Neutral

Likely

Very likely

Question Title

* 11. In June this year, SLCP announced changes to the Signatory Model. Do you have feedback on the changes to the Signatory Model? (Optional question)

Question Title

* 12. What benefits do you experience from being an SLCP Signatory? (Optional question)

Question Title

* 13. The remainder of the survey questions are specific to different categories of SLCP signatories. In order for us to determine which questions to display next, please indicate which of the following categories your company or organization is in.

Manufacturer / Supplier

Manufacturer Industry Association

Brand / Retailer / Agent

Brand Industry Association

Civil society / Non-profit / Multi-stakeholder initiative

Audit Firm

Service Provider

Consultancy

National government

Intergovernmental observers