Skip to content

AIAMC National Initiative X Meeting Two Evaluation

Meeting Two:
Meso Environment Approach; Implementing a Clinical Learning Environment Project
April 17 – 18, 2026
1.Overall, this program was:
Poor
Below Average
Average
Above Average
Excellent
Have the following objectives been met?
2.Apply learnings from storyboard review in preparation of final poster
No
Partially
Yes
3.Articulate feedback provided by National Advisory Council (NAC) members
No
Partially
Yes
4.Advance strategies for optimizing the clinical learning environment
No
Partially
Yes
5.If any of the above objectives were not met, please explain.
Faculty
6.Cited up to date research
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree or Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
7.Inspired me to learn more
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree or Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
8.Engaging: should be invited back
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree or Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
9. Were you informed whether speakers had any potential conflict of interest (either verbally, in the syllabus, and/or via slide?
No
Yes
10.The teaching and learning methods were effective for the subject matter and incorporated active learning.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree or Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
11.The information presented was pertinent to my professional needs/scope of practice.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree or Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
12.My administrative approach and/or practice outcomes will be improved.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree or Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
13.What is your level of commitment to making the changes stated above?
Do not expect to change practice
Not very committed
Somewhat committed
Very committed
14.Do you anticipate barriers in implementing the information gained from this activity?
No
Yes
Please rate the projected impact of this CME activity on your competence, performance and/or patient outcomes.
15.This activity will increase my competence
No
Somewhat
Yes
16.This activity will improve my performance
No
Somewhat
Yes
17.This activity will improve my patient outcomes
No
Somewhat
Yes
18.Was a commercial product, device, or service promoted during this activity?
No
Yes
19.Suggestions for improving this conference so that it will be more effective.
20.Have you participated/attended prior NATIONAL INITIATIVE MEETINGS?
21.Have you participated/attended in OTHER prior AIAMC activities (meetings, annual meetings, webinars, etc.)?
22.NI X Meeting #2 was a valuable use of my time.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree or Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
23.As a result of this activity (Meeting #2), rate your ability to address specific accrediting requirements (e.g., ACGME, ACCME, JC)?
None
Low
Moderate
High
24.Describe a topic/area/idea that emerged during this activity that you plan to address in your organization(s)
25.I plan to collaborate with other entities within our system on this topic/area/idea.
No, Not at this point
Yes, Under Discussion
Yes, In the works
Yes, Definitely
26.Do you plan to share the meeting materials with a colleague from another program/office in your organization or outside your organization? (Check all that apply)
Historically, our cohorts were designed to remain together at meetings 1-4 during the breakout sessions. As our NIs have evolved and for those hospital members with multiple projects, we have found that some prefer presenting to different groups hoping for exposure to other teams and additional perspectives. Others continue to prefer remaining in their usual bi-monthly cohort. While we cannot please every individual 100% of the time, we do strive to do what the majority of our NI participants want. So, a question:
27.When presenting your project during the breakout sessions at NI X meetings 3 and 4, do you prefer to (please choose one)
28.Demographics: I am a