P1. In balancing relevant planning considerations associated with determining development proposals great weight will be attached to any adverse impact upon the amenity, landscape beauty and nature of the National Landscape and the requirement to seek to further the purpose of conserving and enhancing the natural beauty of the National Landscape.
P1. In balancing relevant planning considerations associated with determining development proposals great weight will be attached to any adverse impact upon the amenity, landscape beauty and nature of the National Landscape and the requirement to seek to further the purpose of conserving and enhancing the natural beauty of the National Landscape. Strongly Agree
P1. In balancing relevant planning considerations associated with determining development proposals great weight will be attached to any adverse impact upon the amenity, landscape beauty and nature of the National Landscape and the requirement to seek to further the purpose of conserving and enhancing the natural beauty of the National Landscape. Agree
P1. In balancing relevant planning considerations associated with determining development proposals great weight will be attached to any adverse impact upon the amenity, landscape beauty and nature of the National Landscape and the requirement to seek to further the purpose of conserving and enhancing the natural beauty of the National Landscape. Disagree
P1. In balancing relevant planning considerations associated with determining development proposals great weight will be attached to any adverse impact upon the amenity, landscape beauty and nature of the National Landscape and the requirement to seek to further the purpose of conserving and enhancing the natural beauty of the National Landscape. Strongly Disagree
P2. Development must respect the special landscape character and nature of the locality, giving particular attention to potential impacts day and night on hillsides, ridgelines and relative tranquility. The proposed use and color of external building materials must harmonize with its related landscape and avoid buildings being incongruous.
P2. Development must respect the special landscape character and nature of the locality, giving particular attention to potential impacts day and night on hillsides, ridgelines and relative tranquility. The proposed use and color of external building materials must harmonize with its related landscape and avoid buildings being incongruous. Strongly Agree
P2. Development must respect the special landscape character and nature of the locality, giving particular attention to potential impacts day and night on hillsides, ridgelines and relative tranquility. The proposed use and color of external building materials must harmonize with its related landscape and avoid buildings being incongruous. Agree
P2. Development must respect the special landscape character and nature of the locality, giving particular attention to potential impacts day and night on hillsides, ridgelines and relative tranquility. The proposed use and color of external building materials must harmonize with its related landscape and avoid buildings being incongruous. Disagree
P2. Development must respect the special landscape character and nature of the locality, giving particular attention to potential impacts day and night on hillsides, ridgelines and relative tranquility. The proposed use and color of external building materials must harmonize with its related landscape and avoid buildings being incongruous. Strongly Disagree
P3. Development proposals will be required to be of high quality design, respecting any local distinctiveness and complementary in form, setting and scale with their surroundings and should take any opportunities to enhance their setting. The design of suitable residential or commercial conversions of rural buildings should respect the original rural functional character of the building.
P3. Development proposals will be required to be of high quality design, respecting any local distinctiveness and complementary in form, setting and scale with their surroundings and should take any opportunities to enhance their setting. The design of suitable residential or commercial conversions of rural buildings should respect the original rural functional character of the building. Strongly Agree
P3. Development proposals will be required to be of high quality design, respecting any local distinctiveness and complementary in form, setting and scale with their surroundings and should take any opportunities to enhance their setting. The design of suitable residential or commercial conversions of rural buildings should respect the original rural functional character of the building. Agree
P3. Development proposals will be required to be of high quality design, respecting any local distinctiveness and complementary in form, setting and scale with their surroundings and should take any opportunities to enhance their setting. The design of suitable residential or commercial conversions of rural buildings should respect the original rural functional character of the building. Disagree
P3. Development proposals will be required to be of high quality design, respecting any local distinctiveness and complementary in form, setting and scale with their surroundings and should take any opportunities to enhance their setting. The design of suitable residential or commercial conversions of rural buildings should respect the original rural functional character of the building. Strongly Disagree
P4. Trees and woodlands being an established and essential characteristic of the Surrey Hills National Landscape are unlikely to be accepted as an argument for screening a development in its own right. Additional reasoning and justification which demonstrates that development will conserve and enhance the natural beauty of the National Landscape will be needed.
P4. Trees and woodlands being an established and essential characteristic of the Surrey Hills National Landscape are unlikely to be accepted as an argument for screening a development in its own right. Additional reasoning and justification which demonstrates that development will conserve and enhance the natural beauty of the National Landscape will be needed. Strongly Agree
P4. Trees and woodlands being an established and essential characteristic of the Surrey Hills National Landscape are unlikely to be accepted as an argument for screening a development in its own right. Additional reasoning and justification which demonstrates that development will conserve and enhance the natural beauty of the National Landscape will be needed. Agree
P4. Trees and woodlands being an established and essential characteristic of the Surrey Hills National Landscape are unlikely to be accepted as an argument for screening a development in its own right. Additional reasoning and justification which demonstrates that development will conserve and enhance the natural beauty of the National Landscape will be needed. Disagree
P4. Trees and woodlands being an established and essential characteristic of the Surrey Hills National Landscape are unlikely to be accepted as an argument for screening a development in its own right. Additional reasoning and justification which demonstrates that development will conserve and enhance the natural beauty of the National Landscape will be needed. Strongly Disagree
P5. Development that would fail to conserve and enhance the natural beauty of the National Landscape will be resisted even when well screened. In line with national policy and the Levelling-Up and Regeneration 2023, where overriding exceptional circumstances clearly exist, the impact should be mitigated aimed at there being no residual harm.
P5. Development that would fail to conserve and enhance the natural beauty of the National Landscape will be resisted even when well screened. In line with national policy and the Levelling-Up and Regeneration 2023, where overriding exceptional circumstances clearly exist, the impact should be mitigated aimed at there being no residual harm. Strongly Agree
P5. Development that would fail to conserve and enhance the natural beauty of the National Landscape will be resisted even when well screened. In line with national policy and the Levelling-Up and Regeneration 2023, where overriding exceptional circumstances clearly exist, the impact should be mitigated aimed at there being no residual harm. Agree
P5. Development that would fail to conserve and enhance the natural beauty of the National Landscape will be resisted even when well screened. In line with national policy and the Levelling-Up and Regeneration 2023, where overriding exceptional circumstances clearly exist, the impact should be mitigated aimed at there being no residual harm. Disagree
P5. Development that would fail to conserve and enhance the natural beauty of the National Landscape will be resisted even when well screened. In line with national policy and the Levelling-Up and Regeneration 2023, where overriding exceptional circumstances clearly exist, the impact should be mitigated aimed at there being no residual harm. Strongly Disagree
P6. Farm diversification proposals in character with the National Landscape and financially necessary to enable the long-term continuation of the farm holding and which may also benefit the social and economic well-being of the local community will be supported. Any landscape harm should be adequately mitigated.
P6. Farm diversification proposals in character with the National Landscape and financially necessary to enable the long-term continuation of the farm holding and which may also benefit the social and economic well-being of the local community will be supported. Any landscape harm should be adequately mitigated. Strongly Agree
P6. Farm diversification proposals in character with the National Landscape and financially necessary to enable the long-term continuation of the farm holding and which may also benefit the social and economic well-being of the local community will be supported. Any landscape harm should be adequately mitigated. Agree
P6. Farm diversification proposals in character with the National Landscape and financially necessary to enable the long-term continuation of the farm holding and which may also benefit the social and economic well-being of the local community will be supported. Any landscape harm should be adequately mitigated. Disagree
P6. Farm diversification proposals in character with the National Landscape and financially necessary to enable the long-term continuation of the farm holding and which may also benefit the social and economic well-being of the local community will be supported. Any landscape harm should be adequately mitigated. Strongly Disagree
P7. The residential or commercial conversion of redundant rural buildings of substantial long-term construction should conserve and enhance the natural beauty of the National Land scape and may be acceptable provided they would have no harmful visual impact or activity on the protected landscape compared to its original use. Proposals should demonstrate there will be no need as a result to replace any buildings to be converted in order to manage related land.
P7. The residential or commercial conversion of redundant rural buildings of substantial long-term construction should conserve and enhance the natural beauty of the National Land scape and may be acceptable provided they would have no harmful visual impact or activity on the protected landscape compared to its original use. Proposals should demonstrate there will be no need as a result to replace any buildings to be converted in order to manage related land. Strongly Agree
P7. The residential or commercial conversion of redundant rural buildings of substantial long-term construction should conserve and enhance the natural beauty of the National Land scape and may be acceptable provided they would have no harmful visual impact or activity on the protected landscape compared to its original use. Proposals should demonstrate there will be no need as a result to replace any buildings to be converted in order to manage related land. Agree
P7. The residential or commercial conversion of redundant rural buildings of substantial long-term construction should conserve and enhance the natural beauty of the National Land scape and may be acceptable provided they would have no harmful visual impact or activity on the protected landscape compared to its original use. Proposals should demonstrate there will be no need as a result to replace any buildings to be converted in order to manage related land. Disagree
P7. The residential or commercial conversion of redundant rural buildings of substantial long-term construction should conserve and enhance the natural beauty of the National Land scape and may be acceptable provided they would have no harmful visual impact or activity on the protected landscape compared to its original use. Proposals should demonstrate there will be no need as a result to replace any buildings to be converted in order to manage related land. Strongly Disagree
P8. Any development proposals to redevelop or convert farm buildings or provide for an equestrian use, that would result in farm fragmentation or other loss of the associated farmed landscape or render it unviable, will be resisted.
P8. Any development proposals to redevelop or convert farm buildings or provide for an equestrian use, that would result in farm fragmentation or other loss of the associated farmed landscape or render it unviable, will be resisted. Strongly Agree
P8. Any development proposals to redevelop or convert farm buildings or provide for an equestrian use, that would result in farm fragmentation or other loss of the associated farmed landscape or render it unviable, will be resisted. Agree
P8. Any development proposals to redevelop or convert farm buildings or provide for an equestrian use, that would result in farm fragmentation or other loss of the associated farmed landscape or render it unviable, will be resisted. Disagree
P8. Any development proposals to redevelop or convert farm buildings or provide for an equestrian use, that would result in farm fragmentation or other loss of the associated farmed landscape or render it unviable, will be resisted. Strongly Disagree
P9. Small scale rural exception schemes for affordable housing to be legally maintained in perpetuity, will be supported within or on the edge of villages where there would be no harm to the landscape or which can be satisfactorily mitigated.
P9. Small scale rural exception schemes for affordable housing to be legally maintained in perpetuity, will be supported within or on the edge of villages where there would be no harm to the landscape or which can be satisfactorily mitigated. Strongly Agree
P9. Small scale rural exception schemes for affordable housing to be legally maintained in perpetuity, will be supported within or on the edge of villages where there would be no harm to the landscape or which can be satisfactorily mitigated. Agree
P9. Small scale rural exception schemes for affordable housing to be legally maintained in perpetuity, will be supported within or on the edge of villages where there would be no harm to the landscape or which can be satisfactorily mitigated. Disagree
P9. Small scale rural exception schemes for affordable housing to be legally maintained in perpetuity, will be supported within or on the edge of villages where there would be no harm to the landscape or which can be satisfactorily mitigated. Strongly Disagree
P10. Development proposals will need to demonstrate through accordance with the guidance note published by the Institution of Lighting Professionals on the Reduction of Obtrusive Light, how light pollution affecting the darker skies, wildlife and habitats of the National Landscape will be avoided, including obtrusive external lighting and internal light spill from extensive glazing within proposed domestic, commercial and other premises.
P10. Development proposals will need to demonstrate through accordance with the guidance note published by the Institution of Lighting Professionals on the Reduction of Obtrusive Light, how light pollution affecting the darker skies, wildlife and habitats of the National Landscape will be avoided, including obtrusive external lighting and internal light spill from extensive glazing within proposed domestic, commercial and other premises. Strongly Agree
P10. Development proposals will need to demonstrate through accordance with the guidance note published by the Institution of Lighting Professionals on the Reduction of Obtrusive Light, how light pollution affecting the darker skies, wildlife and habitats of the National Landscape will be avoided, including obtrusive external lighting and internal light spill from extensive glazing within proposed domestic, commercial and other premises. Agree
P10. Development proposals will need to demonstrate through accordance with the guidance note published by the Institution of Lighting Professionals on the Reduction of Obtrusive Light, how light pollution affecting the darker skies, wildlife and habitats of the National Landscape will be avoided, including obtrusive external lighting and internal light spill from extensive glazing within proposed domestic, commercial and other premises. Disagree
P10. Development proposals will need to demonstrate through accordance with the guidance note published by the Institution of Lighting Professionals on the Reduction of Obtrusive Light, how light pollution affecting the darker skies, wildlife and habitats of the National Landscape will be avoided, including obtrusive external lighting and internal light spill from extensive glazing within proposed domestic, commercial and other premises. Strongly Disagree
P11. Renewable energy projects will be supported where it can be clearly demonstrated they would not harm the natural beauty of the Surrey Hills National Landscape.
P11. Renewable energy projects will be supported where it can be clearly demonstrated they would not harm the natural beauty of the Surrey Hills National Landscape. Strongly Agree
P11. Renewable energy projects will be supported where it can be clearly demonstrated they would not harm the natural beauty of the Surrey Hills National Landscape. Agree
P11. Renewable energy projects will be supported where it can be clearly demonstrated they would not harm the natural beauty of the Surrey Hills National Landscape. Disagree
P11. Renewable energy projects will be supported where it can be clearly demonstrated they would not harm the natural beauty of the Surrey Hills National Landscape. Strongly Disagree
P12. Development outside the boundary of the Surrey Hills National Landscape that would adversely impact its setting by harming public views to or from it, or which would generate harmful additional traffic flows along its country lanes, should be resisted.
P12. Development outside the boundary of the Surrey Hills National Landscape that would adversely impact its setting by harming public views to or from it, or which would generate harmful additional traffic flows along its country lanes, should be resisted. Strongly Agree
P12. Development outside the boundary of the Surrey Hills National Landscape that would adversely impact its setting by harming public views to or from it, or which would generate harmful additional traffic flows along its country lanes, should be resisted. Agree
P12. Development outside the boundary of the Surrey Hills National Landscape that would adversely impact its setting by harming public views to or from it, or which would generate harmful additional traffic flows along its country lanes, should be resisted. Disagree
P12. Development outside the boundary of the Surrey Hills National Landscape that would adversely impact its setting by harming public views to or from it, or which would generate harmful additional traffic flows along its country lanes, should be resisted. Strongly Disagree
