PUBMET 2015
SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING IN THE CONTEXT OF OPEN SCIENCE

Dear participants,

We would like to thank you for your participation in the PUBMET 2015 conference.

The organizing committee would like to invite you to take a moment to complete our conference evaluation feedback. Conference evaluations provide vital information for improvement and thus your feedback will enable PUBMET 2016 organizers to better meet your needs and expectations.

This evaluation will take no more than 3 minutes of your time.

Thanks for your collaboration.

Sincerely,

Jadranka Stojanovski, on behalf of the PUBMET 2015 Organizing Committee

* 1. How did you hear or learn about this conference?

* 2. Please, rate the motivating forces that made you register for the PUBMET 2015 conference

  Most important Important Not important
Access to professional trends
Access to research achievements
Awareness-raising of project results
Conference theme
Face-to-face meeting with colleagues
Invited speakers
Networking possibility
Pre-conference workshop
Publication of academic work
Reasonable participation fee
Sharing experiences
Venue of the conference

* 3. How do you assess the quality of the PUBMET 2015 conference?

  Poor Fair Satisfactory Good Excellent
Academic content
Invited speakers
Networking possibilities
Paper presentations
Poster presentations
Professional content
Proficiency of session chairs/moderators
Structure of the event
Usefulness of the information received
Workshop 1: The Insiders’ Guide to Getting Published in International Research Journals
Workshop 2: Research Nation Croatia: Croatian research excellence and challenges, as reflected by Elsevier’s SciVal platform

* 4. How do you assess the services of the conference?

  Poor Fair Satisfactory Good Excellent
Conference website
Pre-conference online assistance
Conference Dinner
Registration Desk services
Equipment and IT assistance in the sessions
Wifi access for participants

* 5. What is your overall impression?

  Not at all Not too much I feel indifferent To some extent Very much
Did the Conference fulfill your expectations in academic/professional terms?
Did the Conference fulfill your expectations in organisational terms?
Did the Conference fulfill your expectations as a networking event?
Are you planning to attend future PUBMET Conferences?
Would you recommend your colleagues/peers to attend PUBMET conferences?

* 6. Was there a part of the programme, a speech, presentation or a social event that you found particularly good?

* 7. What makes the PUBMET 2015 Conference different from other conferences you participated in the field related to information science?

* 8. In what ways could PUBMET Conferences better serve your needs and interests?

* 9. What do you think about the University of Zadar as a conference meeting venue?

Thank you very much for your contribution.

The outcomes of the survey will be fed back into the organization of future PubMet Conferences.

T