A. Webb Roberts Center for Continuing Medical Education Internal Medicine Review Day 4 Evaluation Thursday 7/18/2019 Question Title * 1. Title MD DO Resident DPM PA Nurse Practitioner Other Other (please specify) Question Title * 2. To help us evaluate the successfulness of our educational activity, please list changes you intend to make in your current role as a result of attending this activity:(i.e., Change/improve strategies for treatment of pulmonary patients based on evidence presented) 1 2 Question Title * 3. Was the content free of bias? Yes No If you selected No, please indicate bias perceived during this presentation. Question Title * 4. Faculty Evaluation:Testosterone Trends - Erin Bird, MD, MBA (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5) Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5) Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5) Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5) Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5) Excellent Comment: Question Title * 5. Faculty Evaluation:Pharmacogenomics and Your Practice : What Clinicians Need to Know - Deedee Hu, PharmD (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5) Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5) Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5) Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5) Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5) Excellent Comment: Question Title * 6. Faculty Evaluation:How and Why to Prescribe Exercise for Health - Karen Harrison, MD (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5) Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5) Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5) Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5) Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5) Excellent Comment: Question Title * 7. Faculty Evaluation:Updates in Prostrate Disease Management - Erin Bird, MD, MBA (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5) Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5) Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5) Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5) Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5) Excellent Comment: Question Title * 8. Faculty Evaluation:Vitamin D: Sunshine in a Pill - Deedee Hu, PharmD (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5) Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5) Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5) Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5) Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5) Excellent Comment: Question Title * 9. Faculty Evaluation:Proven Interventions to Improve Patient Adherence - Jennifer Day, BSN, MSN, APRN, FNP-C (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5) Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5) Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5) Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5) Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5) Excellent (*Ethics)Comment: Question Title * 10. Faculty Evaluation:New Guidelines: Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia - A Case Based Approach - John P. Erwin, III, MD (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5) Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5) Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5) Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5) Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5) Excellent (*Ethics)Comment: Question Title * 11. Other Comments: Done
