2018 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

MD/DO

ARNP/RN/NP

Resident/Fellow

PT/DPT

AT/OT

Other

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Yes

If no, please explain

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Yes

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Question Title

* 6. How well were the 2018 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

	Significantly Met	Somewhat Met	Not Met
Evaluate and weigh multiple surgical treatment options for complex reconstructions	Evaluate and weigh multiple surgical treatment options for complex reconstructions Significantly Met	Evaluate and weigh multiple surgical treatment options for complex reconstructions Somewhat Met	Evaluate and weigh multiple surgical treatment options for complex reconstructions Not Met
Develop a greater awareness of the latest technology available for difficult infection cases	Develop a greater awareness of the latest technology available for difficult infection cases Significantly Met	Develop a greater awareness of the latest technology available for difficult infection cases Somewhat Met	Develop a greater awareness of the latest technology available for difficult infection cases Not Met
Cite the latest clinical findings on complex reconstruction outcome	Cite the latest clinical findings on complex reconstruction outcome Significantly Met	Cite the latest clinical findings on complex reconstruction outcome Somewhat Met	Cite the latest clinical findings on complex reconstruction outcome Not Met
Anticipate common complex reconstruction postoperative complications	Anticipate common complex reconstruction postoperative complications Significantly Met	Anticipate common complex reconstruction postoperative complications Somewhat Met	Anticipate common complex reconstruction postoperative complications Not Met

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Significantly Met

Somewhat Met

Not Met

We encourage you to expand on your answer below:

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

This activity validated my current practice; no changes will be made.

Create/revise protcols, policies and/or procedures.

Change the management and/or treatment of my patients.

Other, please specify

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Very Relevant

Relevant

Somewhat Relevant

Not Very Relevant

Irrelevant

Please explain:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:
Session I: Guidelines to Joint Infections

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Donald Hohman, MD - Diagnosis & Testing of Infections: What Are Our Best Tools?	Donald Hohman, MD - Diagnosis & Testing of Infections: What Are Our Best Tools? Excellent	Donald Hohman, MD - Diagnosis & Testing of Infections: What Are Our Best Tools? Very Good	Donald Hohman, MD - Diagnosis & Testing of Infections: What Are Our Best Tools? Good	Donald Hohman, MD - Diagnosis & Testing of Infections: What Are Our Best Tools? Fair	Donald Hohman, MD - Diagnosis & Testing of Infections: What Are Our Best Tools? Poor
Janet D. Conway, MD - When Not to Do Surgery	Janet D. Conway, MD - When Not to Do Surgery Excellent	Janet D. Conway, MD - When Not to Do Surgery Very Good	Janet D. Conway, MD - When Not to Do Surgery Good	Janet D. Conway, MD - When Not to Do Surgery Fair	Janet D. Conway, MD - When Not to Do Surgery Poor
Richard Buch, MD - How to Maximize Results in Surgery	Richard Buch, MD - How to Maximize Results in Surgery Excellent	Richard Buch, MD - How to Maximize Results in Surgery Very Good	Richard Buch, MD - How to Maximize Results in Surgery Good	Richard Buch, MD - How to Maximize Results in Surgery Fair	Richard Buch, MD - How to Maximize Results in Surgery Poor
Lucileia Johnson, MD - Overview of Antibiotics Treatment: Is 6 Weeks the Norm? What About Suppression?	Lucileia Johnson, MD - Overview of Antibiotics Treatment: Is 6 Weeks the Norm? What About Suppression? Excellent	Lucileia Johnson, MD - Overview of Antibiotics Treatment: Is 6 Weeks the Norm? What About Suppression? Very Good	Lucileia Johnson, MD - Overview of Antibiotics Treatment: Is 6 Weeks the Norm? What About Suppression? Good	Lucileia Johnson, MD - Overview of Antibiotics Treatment: Is 6 Weeks the Norm? What About Suppression? Fair	Lucileia Johnson, MD - Overview of Antibiotics Treatment: Is 6 Weeks the Norm? What About Suppression? Poor
Edward Silverman, MD - Results Overview: Prosthetic Infection, Salvage, One Stage & Two Stage	Edward Silverman, MD - Results Overview: Prosthetic Infection, Salvage, One Stage & Two Stage Excellent	Edward Silverman, MD - Results Overview: Prosthetic Infection, Salvage, One Stage & Two Stage Very Good	Edward Silverman, MD - Results Overview: Prosthetic Infection, Salvage, One Stage & Two Stage Good	Edward Silverman, MD - Results Overview: Prosthetic Infection, Salvage, One Stage & Two Stage Fair	Edward Silverman, MD - Results Overview: Prosthetic Infection, Salvage, One Stage & Two Stage Poor

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:
Session II: Alternative Treatment Options for Difficult Cases

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
H. Thomas Temple, MD - Antibiotic Spacers as a Treatment Option	H. Thomas Temple, MD - Antibiotic Spacers as a Treatment Option Excellent	H. Thomas Temple, MD - Antibiotic Spacers as a Treatment Option Very Good	H. Thomas Temple, MD - Antibiotic Spacers as a Treatment Option Good	H. Thomas Temple, MD - Antibiotic Spacers as a Treatment Option Fair	H. Thomas Temple, MD - Antibiotic Spacers as a Treatment Option Poor
Brian de Beaubian, MD - Intra-Articular Delivery System for Treatment vs. Standard	Brian de Beaubian, MD - Intra-Articular Delivery System for Treatment vs. Standard Excellent	Brian de Beaubian, MD - Intra-Articular Delivery System for Treatment vs. Standard Very Good	Brian de Beaubian, MD - Intra-Articular Delivery System for Treatment vs. Standard Good	Brian de Beaubian, MD - Intra-Articular Delivery System for Treatment vs. Standard Fair	Brian de Beaubian, MD - Intra-Articular Delivery System for Treatment vs. Standard Poor
Edward Y. Cheng, MD - Fungal Joint Infections	Edward Y. Cheng, MD - Fungal Joint Infections Excellent	Edward Y. Cheng, MD - Fungal Joint Infections Very Good	Edward Y. Cheng, MD - Fungal Joint Infections Good	Edward Y. Cheng, MD - Fungal Joint Infections Fair	Edward Y. Cheng, MD - Fungal Joint Infections Poor
Bennie Lindeque, MD - Mycobacterial Joint Infections	Bennie Lindeque, MD - Mycobacterial Joint Infections Excellent	Bennie Lindeque, MD - Mycobacterial Joint Infections Very Good	Bennie Lindeque, MD - Mycobacterial Joint Infections Good	Bennie Lindeque, MD - Mycobacterial Joint Infections Fair	Bennie Lindeque, MD - Mycobacterial Joint Infections Poor
Andre Spiguel, MD - Infected Non-Unions & Treatment Options	Andre Spiguel, MD - Infected Non-Unions & Treatment Options Excellent	Andre Spiguel, MD - Infected Non-Unions & Treatment Options Very Good	Andre Spiguel, MD - Infected Non-Unions & Treatment Options Good	Andre Spiguel, MD - Infected Non-Unions & Treatment Options Fair	Andre Spiguel, MD - Infected Non-Unions & Treatment Options Poor
Mark Dahl, MD - Limb Length Deformity & Reconstruction in Severe Bone Defects	Mark Dahl, MD - Limb Length Deformity & Reconstruction in Severe Bone Defects Excellent	Mark Dahl, MD - Limb Length Deformity & Reconstruction in Severe Bone Defects Very Good	Mark Dahl, MD - Limb Length Deformity & Reconstruction in Severe Bone Defects Good	Mark Dahl, MD - Limb Length Deformity & Reconstruction in Severe Bone Defects Fair	Mark Dahl, MD - Limb Length Deformity & Reconstruction in Severe Bone Defects Poor
Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - Argument For Operating on Obese Patients	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - Argument For Operating on Obese Patients Excellent	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - Argument For Operating on Obese Patients Very Good	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - Argument For Operating on Obese Patients Good	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - Argument For Operating on Obese Patients Fair	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - Argument For Operating on Obese Patients Poor
Judd E. Cummings, MD, FACS - Argument Against Operating on Obese Patients	Judd E. Cummings, MD, FACS - Argument Against Operating on Obese Patients Excellent	Judd E. Cummings, MD, FACS - Argument Against Operating on Obese Patients Very Good	Judd E. Cummings, MD, FACS - Argument Against Operating on Obese Patients Good	Judd E. Cummings, MD, FACS - Argument Against Operating on Obese Patients Fair	Judd E. Cummings, MD, FACS - Argument Against Operating on Obese Patients Poor

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:
Session III: Chairmen Choice Presentations

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Daniel Kotrych, MD - The New Concept of 3D Reconstructions: How to Stimulate Osseointegration in a Sarcoma Patient	Daniel Kotrych, MD - The New Concept of 3D Reconstructions: How to Stimulate Osseointegration in a Sarcoma Patient Excellent	Daniel Kotrych, MD - The New Concept of 3D Reconstructions: How to Stimulate Osseointegration in a Sarcoma Patient Very Good	Daniel Kotrych, MD - The New Concept of 3D Reconstructions: How to Stimulate Osseointegration in a Sarcoma Patient Good	Daniel Kotrych, MD - The New Concept of 3D Reconstructions: How to Stimulate Osseointegration in a Sarcoma Patient Fair	Daniel Kotrych, MD - The New Concept of 3D Reconstructions: How to Stimulate Osseointegration in a Sarcoma Patient Poor
Joseph Benevenia, MD - Experience with Unique Options for Diaphyseal Bone Loss	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Experience with Unique Options for Diaphyseal Bone Loss Excellent	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Experience with Unique Options for Diaphyseal Bone Loss Very Good	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Experience with Unique Options for Diaphyseal Bone Loss Good	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Experience with Unique Options for Diaphyseal Bone Loss Fair	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Experience with Unique Options for Diaphyseal Bone Loss Poor
Richard Carey-Smith, MD - Argument for One-Stage	Richard Carey-Smith, MD - Argument for One-Stage Excellent	Richard Carey-Smith, MD - Argument for One-Stage Very Good	Richard Carey-Smith, MD - Argument for One-Stage Good	Richard Carey-Smith, MD - Argument for One-Stage Fair	Richard Carey-Smith, MD - Argument for One-Stage Poor
John A. Abraham, MD - Argument for Two-Stage	John A. Abraham, MD - Argument for Two-Stage Excellent	John A. Abraham, MD - Argument for Two-Stage Very Good	John A. Abraham, MD - Argument for Two-Stage Good	John A. Abraham, MD - Argument for Two-Stage Fair	John A. Abraham, MD - Argument for Two-Stage Poor
Herrick J. Siegel, MD - Argument for Intercalary Prosthesis	Herrick J. Siegel, MD - Argument for Intercalary Prosthesis Excellent	Herrick J. Siegel, MD - Argument for Intercalary Prosthesis Very Good	Herrick J. Siegel, MD - Argument for Intercalary Prosthesis Good	Herrick J. Siegel, MD - Argument for Intercalary Prosthesis Fair	Herrick J. Siegel, MD - Argument for Intercalary Prosthesis Poor
H. Thomas Temple, MD - Argument for Allograft/Bone Reconstruction Bone Defects	H. Thomas Temple, MD - Argument for Allograft/Bone Reconstruction Bone Defects Excellent	H. Thomas Temple, MD - Argument for Allograft/Bone Reconstruction Bone Defects Very Good	H. Thomas Temple, MD - Argument for Allograft/Bone Reconstruction Bone Defects Good	H. Thomas Temple, MD - Argument for Allograft/Bone Reconstruction Bone Defects Fair	H. Thomas Temple, MD - Argument for Allograft/Bone Reconstruction Bone Defects Poor
William R. Arbeláez, MD - KEYNOTE SPEAKER: The Colombian Experience with Complex Reconstructions	William R. Arbeláez, MD - KEYNOTE SPEAKER: The Colombian Experience with Complex Reconstructions Excellent	William R. Arbeláez, MD - KEYNOTE SPEAKER: The Colombian Experience with Complex Reconstructions Very Good	William R. Arbeláez, MD - KEYNOTE SPEAKER: The Colombian Experience with Complex Reconstructions Good	William R. Arbeláez, MD - KEYNOTE SPEAKER: The Colombian Experience with Complex Reconstructions Fair	William R. Arbeláez, MD - KEYNOTE SPEAKER: The Colombian Experience with Complex Reconstructions Poor

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:
Session IV: Silver - Can it Really Help Solve Infection?

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - Indications on When to Use Silver	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - Indications on When to Use Silver Excellent	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - Indications on When to Use Silver Very Good	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - Indications on When to Use Silver Good	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - Indications on When to Use Silver Fair	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - Indications on When to Use Silver Poor
Arne Streitbüerger, MD - The German Experience on Reconstruction: History & Results	Arne Streitbüerger, MD - The German Experience on Reconstruction: History & Results Excellent	Arne Streitbüerger, MD - The German Experience on Reconstruction: History & Results Very Good	Arne Streitbüerger, MD - The German Experience on Reconstruction: History & Results Good	Arne Streitbüerger, MD - The German Experience on Reconstruction: History & Results Fair	Arne Streitbüerger, MD - The German Experience on Reconstruction: History & Results Poor

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:
Session V: Complex Reconstruction of the Knee

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Joseph Benevenia, MD - Extreme Bone Loss Options	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Extreme Bone Loss Options Excellent	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Extreme Bone Loss Options Very Good	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Extreme Bone Loss Options Good	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Extreme Bone Loss Options Fair	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Extreme Bone Loss Options Poor
Anna A. Kulidjian, MD, MSc, FRCSC - Complex Reconstruction of the Knee: The US Experience	Anna A. Kulidjian, MD, MSc, FRCSC - Complex Reconstruction of the Knee: The US Experience Excellent	Anna A. Kulidjian, MD, MSc, FRCSC - Complex Reconstruction of the Knee: The US Experience Very Good	Anna A. Kulidjian, MD, MSc, FRCSC - Complex Reconstruction of the Knee: The US Experience Good	Anna A. Kulidjian, MD, MSc, FRCSC - Complex Reconstruction of the Knee: The US Experience Fair	Anna A. Kulidjian, MD, MSc, FRCSC - Complex Reconstruction of the Knee: The US Experience Poor
Bryan Moon, MD - Long-Term Results on Tumor Patients	Bryan Moon, MD - Long-Term Results on Tumor Patients Excellent	Bryan Moon, MD - Long-Term Results on Tumor Patients Very Good	Bryan Moon, MD - Long-Term Results on Tumor Patients Good	Bryan Moon, MD - Long-Term Results on Tumor Patients Fair	Bryan Moon, MD - Long-Term Results on Tumor Patients Poor
Herrick J. Siegel, MD - Long-Term Results on Trauma & Infection	Herrick J. Siegel, MD - Long-Term Results on Trauma & Infection Excellent	Herrick J. Siegel, MD - Long-Term Results on Trauma & Infection Very Good	Herrick J. Siegel, MD - Long-Term Results on Trauma & Infection Good	Herrick J. Siegel, MD - Long-Term Results on Trauma & Infection Fair	Herrick J. Siegel, MD - Long-Term Results on Trauma & Infection Poor
Jon Minter, DO - Treatment of Periprosthetic Fractures of the Knee	Jon Minter, DO - Treatment of Periprosthetic Fractures of the Knee Excellent	Jon Minter, DO - Treatment of Periprosthetic Fractures of the Knee Very Good	Jon Minter, DO - Treatment of Periprosthetic Fractures of the Knee Good	Jon Minter, DO - Treatment of Periprosthetic Fractures of the Knee Fair	Jon Minter, DO - Treatment of Periprosthetic Fractures of the Knee Poor

Question Title

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:
Session VI: Complex Treatment Options of the Knee

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Richard Carey-Smith, MD - Cones & Augments for Knee Reconstruction	Richard Carey-Smith, MD - Cones & Augments for Knee Reconstruction Excellent	Richard Carey-Smith, MD - Cones & Augments for Knee Reconstruction Very Good	Richard Carey-Smith, MD - Cones & Augments for Knee Reconstruction Good	Richard Carey-Smith, MD - Cones & Augments for Knee Reconstruction Fair	Richard Carey-Smith, MD - Cones & Augments for Knee Reconstruction Poor
Judd E. Cummings, MD, FACS - Complications & Limitations to Compress: Is it Still a Reliable Treatment Option?	Judd E. Cummings, MD, FACS - Complications & Limitations to Compress: Is it Still a Reliable Treatment Option? Excellent	Judd E. Cummings, MD, FACS - Complications & Limitations to Compress: Is it Still a Reliable Treatment Option? Very Good	Judd E. Cummings, MD, FACS - Complications & Limitations to Compress: Is it Still a Reliable Treatment Option? Good	Judd E. Cummings, MD, FACS - Complications & Limitations to Compress: Is it Still a Reliable Treatment Option? Fair	Judd E. Cummings, MD, FACS - Complications & Limitations to Compress: Is it Still a Reliable Treatment Option? Poor
Janet D. Conway, MD - Fusion as a Treatment Option of Failed Knee	Janet D. Conway, MD - Fusion as a Treatment Option of Failed Knee Excellent	Janet D. Conway, MD - Fusion as a Treatment Option of Failed Knee Very Good	Janet D. Conway, MD - Fusion as a Treatment Option of Failed Knee Good	Janet D. Conway, MD - Fusion as a Treatment Option of Failed Knee Fair	Janet D. Conway, MD - Fusion as a Treatment Option of Failed Knee Poor
Shervin Oskouei, MD - Patella Tendon Disaster: It's Torn Off, OMG! What Now?	Shervin Oskouei, MD - Patella Tendon Disaster: It's Torn Off, OMG! What Now? Excellent	Shervin Oskouei, MD - Patella Tendon Disaster: It's Torn Off, OMG! What Now? Very Good	Shervin Oskouei, MD - Patella Tendon Disaster: It's Torn Off, OMG! What Now? Good	Shervin Oskouei, MD - Patella Tendon Disaster: It's Torn Off, OMG! What Now? Fair	Shervin Oskouei, MD - Patella Tendon Disaster: It's Torn Off, OMG! What Now? Poor
John C. Neilson, MD - Re-Implantation vs. Bone Resection & Megaprosthesis for Recurrent Infection	John C. Neilson, MD - Re-Implantation vs. Bone Resection & Megaprosthesis for Recurrent Infection Excellent	John C. Neilson, MD - Re-Implantation vs. Bone Resection & Megaprosthesis for Recurrent Infection Very Good	John C. Neilson, MD - Re-Implantation vs. Bone Resection & Megaprosthesis for Recurrent Infection Good	John C. Neilson, MD - Re-Implantation vs. Bone Resection & Megaprosthesis for Recurrent Infection Fair	John C. Neilson, MD - Re-Implantation vs. Bone Resection & Megaprosthesis for Recurrent Infection Poor
Donald Hohman, MD - Argument for Cemented	Donald Hohman, MD - Argument for Cemented Excellent	Donald Hohman, MD - Argument for Cemented Very Good	Donald Hohman, MD - Argument for Cemented Good	Donald Hohman, MD - Argument for Cemented Fair	Donald Hohman, MD - Argument for Cemented Poor
Sander Dijkstra, MD, PhD - Argument for Uncemented	Sander Dijkstra, MD, PhD - Argument for Uncemented Excellent	Sander Dijkstra, MD, PhD - Argument for Uncemented Very Good	Sander Dijkstra, MD, PhD - Argument for Uncemented Good	Sander Dijkstra, MD, PhD - Argument for Uncemented Fair	Sander Dijkstra, MD, PhD - Argument for Uncemented Poor

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:
Session VII: Clinical Dilemmas: What Would You Do?

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Edward Y. Cheng, MD - Failed Recurrent Joint Infection: Amputation vs. Reconstruction	Edward Y. Cheng, MD - Failed Recurrent Joint Infection: Amputation vs. Reconstruction Excellent	Edward Y. Cheng, MD - Failed Recurrent Joint Infection: Amputation vs. Reconstruction Very Good	Edward Y. Cheng, MD - Failed Recurrent Joint Infection: Amputation vs. Reconstruction Good	Edward Y. Cheng, MD - Failed Recurrent Joint Infection: Amputation vs. Reconstruction Fair	Edward Y. Cheng, MD - Failed Recurrent Joint Infection: Amputation vs. Reconstruction Poor
Edward Y. Cheng, MD - What Do You Do With This?	Edward Y. Cheng, MD - What Do You Do With This? Excellent	Edward Y. Cheng, MD - What Do You Do With This? Very Good	Edward Y. Cheng, MD - What Do You Do With This? Good	Edward Y. Cheng, MD - What Do You Do With This? Fair	Edward Y. Cheng, MD - What Do You Do With This? Poor

Question Title

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:
Session VIII: Hip Reconstructive Options

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Jon Minter, DO - Periprosthetic Hip Fractures	Jon Minter, DO - Periprosthetic Hip Fractures Excellent	Jon Minter, DO - Periprosthetic Hip Fractures Very Good	Jon Minter, DO - Periprosthetic Hip Fractures Good	Jon Minter, DO - Periprosthetic Hip Fractures Fair	Jon Minter, DO - Periprosthetic Hip Fractures Poor
John C. Neilson, MD - Failed Reconstruction Hip Fractures >70 y/o - A Common Problem: What are the Best Options?	John C. Neilson, MD - Failed Reconstruction Hip Fractures >70 y/o - A Common Problem: What are the Best Options? Excellent	John C. Neilson, MD - Failed Reconstruction Hip Fractures >70 y/o - A Common Problem: What are the Best Options? Very Good	John C. Neilson, MD - Failed Reconstruction Hip Fractures >70 y/o - A Common Problem: What are the Best Options? Good	John C. Neilson, MD - Failed Reconstruction Hip Fractures >70 y/o - A Common Problem: What are the Best Options? Fair	John C. Neilson, MD - Failed Reconstruction Hip Fractures >70 y/o - A Common Problem: What are the Best Options? Poor
Pietro Ruggieri, MD, PhD - Proximal Femoral Reconstruction: The European "Italian" Experience	Pietro Ruggieri, MD, PhD - Proximal Femoral Reconstruction: The European "Italian" Experience Excellent	Pietro Ruggieri, MD, PhD - Proximal Femoral Reconstruction: The European "Italian" Experience Very Good	Pietro Ruggieri, MD, PhD - Proximal Femoral Reconstruction: The European "Italian" Experience Good	Pietro Ruggieri, MD, PhD - Proximal Femoral Reconstruction: The European "Italian" Experience Fair	Pietro Ruggieri, MD, PhD - Proximal Femoral Reconstruction: The European "Italian" Experience Poor
Juan Pretell, MD - Indications When to do a Total Femur	Juan Pretell, MD - Indications When to do a Total Femur Excellent	Juan Pretell, MD - Indications When to do a Total Femur Very Good	Juan Pretell, MD - Indications When to do a Total Femur Good	Juan Pretell, MD - Indications When to do a Total Femur Fair	Juan Pretell, MD - Indications When to do a Total Femur Poor
John A. Abraham, MD - Custom Implants vs. Cages for Acetabular Defects	John A. Abraham, MD - Custom Implants vs. Cages for Acetabular Defects Excellent	John A. Abraham, MD - Custom Implants vs. Cages for Acetabular Defects Very Good	John A. Abraham, MD - Custom Implants vs. Cages for Acetabular Defects Good	John A. Abraham, MD - Custom Implants vs. Cages for Acetabular Defects Fair	John A. Abraham, MD - Custom Implants vs. Cages for Acetabular Defects Poor
H. Thomas Temple, MD - Biologic Treatment Options for the Hip	H. Thomas Temple, MD - Biologic Treatment Options for the Hip Excellent	H. Thomas Temple, MD - Biologic Treatment Options for the Hip Very Good	H. Thomas Temple, MD - Biologic Treatment Options for the Hip Good	H. Thomas Temple, MD - Biologic Treatment Options for the Hip Fair	H. Thomas Temple, MD - Biologic Treatment Options for the Hip Poor
Sander Dijkstra, MD, PhD - LUMIC - When Nothing is Left: The Ice Cone Cup Reconstruction	Sander Dijkstra, MD, PhD - LUMIC - When Nothing is Left: The Ice Cone Cup Reconstruction Excellent	Sander Dijkstra, MD, PhD - LUMIC - When Nothing is Left: The Ice Cone Cup Reconstruction Very Good	Sander Dijkstra, MD, PhD - LUMIC - When Nothing is Left: The Ice Cone Cup Reconstruction Good	Sander Dijkstra, MD, PhD - LUMIC - When Nothing is Left: The Ice Cone Cup Reconstruction Fair	Sander Dijkstra, MD, PhD - LUMIC - When Nothing is Left: The Ice Cone Cup Reconstruction Poor

Question Title

* 18. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:
Session IX: Open Discussion: Limb Lengthening

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Joseph Benevenia, MD - Expandables: The Rutgers Experience	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Expandables: The Rutgers Experience Excellent	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Expandables: The Rutgers Experience Very Good	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Expandables: The Rutgers Experience Good	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Expandables: The Rutgers Experience Fair	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Expandables: The Rutgers Experience Poor
Mark Dahl, MD - Arthroplasty & Leg Lengthening	Mark Dahl, MD - Arthroplasty & Leg Lengthening Excellent	Mark Dahl, MD - Arthroplasty & Leg Lengthening Very Good	Mark Dahl, MD - Arthroplasty & Leg Lengthening Good	Mark Dahl, MD - Arthroplasty & Leg Lengthening Fair	Mark Dahl, MD - Arthroplasty & Leg Lengthening Poor

Question Title

* 19. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:
Session X: Complex Problems of the Shoulder

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Pietro Ruggieri, MD, PhD - Reverse Shoulders for Complex Reconstructions	Pietro Ruggieri, MD, PhD - Reverse Shoulders for Complex Reconstructions Excellent	Pietro Ruggieri, MD, PhD - Reverse Shoulders for Complex Reconstructions Very Good	Pietro Ruggieri, MD, PhD - Reverse Shoulders for Complex Reconstructions Good	Pietro Ruggieri, MD, PhD - Reverse Shoulders for Complex Reconstructions Fair	Pietro Ruggieri, MD, PhD - Reverse Shoulders for Complex Reconstructions Poor
Arne Streitbüerger, MD - Complex Humeral & Shoulder Reconstructions	Arne Streitbüerger, MD - Complex Humeral & Shoulder Reconstructions Excellent	Arne Streitbüerger, MD - Complex Humeral & Shoulder Reconstructions Very Good	Arne Streitbüerger, MD - Complex Humeral & Shoulder Reconstructions Good	Arne Streitbüerger, MD - Complex Humeral & Shoulder Reconstructions Fair	Arne Streitbüerger, MD - Complex Humeral & Shoulder Reconstructions Poor
Wayne "Buz" Burkhead, MD - Results of Revision Devices: Hemi vs. Resection Arthroplasty	Wayne "Buz" Burkhead, MD - Results of Revision Devices: Hemi vs. Resection Arthroplasty Excellent	Wayne "Buz" Burkhead, MD - Results of Revision Devices: Hemi vs. Resection Arthroplasty Very Good	Wayne "Buz" Burkhead, MD - Results of Revision Devices: Hemi vs. Resection Arthroplasty Good	Wayne "Buz" Burkhead, MD - Results of Revision Devices: Hemi vs. Resection Arthroplasty Fair	Wayne "Buz" Burkhead, MD - Results of Revision Devices: Hemi vs. Resection Arthroplasty Poor
John Itamura, MD - Reconstructive Early Results with Custom Cages: Short Term Results with Vault Systems	John Itamura, MD - Reconstructive Early Results with Custom Cages: Short Term Results with Vault Systems Excellent	John Itamura, MD - Reconstructive Early Results with Custom Cages: Short Term Results with Vault Systems Very Good	John Itamura, MD - Reconstructive Early Results with Custom Cages: Short Term Results with Vault Systems Good	John Itamura, MD - Reconstructive Early Results with Custom Cages: Short Term Results with Vault Systems Fair	John Itamura, MD - Reconstructive Early Results with Custom Cages: Short Term Results with Vault Systems Poor
Wayne "Buz" Burkhead, MD - Shoulder Panel Discussion - What Do We Do?	Wayne "Buz" Burkhead, MD - Shoulder Panel Discussion - What Do We Do? Excellent	Wayne "Buz" Burkhead, MD - Shoulder Panel Discussion - What Do We Do? Very Good	Wayne "Buz" Burkhead, MD - Shoulder Panel Discussion - What Do We Do? Good	Wayne "Buz" Burkhead, MD - Shoulder Panel Discussion - What Do We Do? Fair	Wayne "Buz" Burkhead, MD - Shoulder Panel Discussion - What Do We Do? Poor

Question Title

* 20. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 21. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 22. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 23. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Direct Mail

Eblast

Phone Call

Course Catalog

Orthopedics Today/Orthopedics Ad

Social Media (Facebook/Twitter)

Referral (Please list below)

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 24. Please provide your contact information.

Full Name:

Degree:

Email Address:

Phone Number:

Question Title

* 25. PHYSICIANS: This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the accreditation requirements and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME). FORE is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
FORE designates this live activity for a maximum of 21.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Please attest to the total number of credit hours (minimum .25 - maximum 21.5) that you spent in this CME activity:

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest. Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support? (One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Question Title

* 6. How well were the 2018 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference course objectives met?Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:Session I: Guidelines to Joint Infections

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:Session II: Alternative Treatment Options for Difficult Cases

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:Session III: Chairmen Choice Presentations

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:Session IV: Silver - Can it Really Help Solve Infection?

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:Session V: Complex Reconstruction of the Knee

Question Title

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:Session VI: Complex Treatment Options of the Knee

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:Session VII: Clinical Dilemmas: What Would You Do?

Question Title

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:Session VIII: Hip Reconstructive Options

Question Title

* 18. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:Session IX: Open Discussion: Limb Lengthening

Question Title

* 19. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:Session X: Complex Problems of the Shoulder

Question Title

* 20. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 21. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 22. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 23. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Question Title

* 24. Please provide your contact information.

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

* 6. How well were the 2018 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:
Session I: Guidelines to Joint Infections

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:
Session II: Alternative Treatment Options for Difficult Cases

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:
Session III: Chairmen Choice Presentations

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:
Session IV: Silver - Can it Really Help Solve Infection?

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:
Session V: Complex Reconstruction of the Knee

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:
Session VI: Complex Treatment Options of the Knee

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:
Session VII: Clinical Dilemmas: What Would You Do?

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:
Session VIII: Hip Reconstructive Options

* 18. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:
Session IX: Open Discussion: Limb Lengthening

* 19. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 3rd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference Speakers:
Session X: Complex Problems of the Shoulder