A. Webb Roberts Center for Continuing Medical Education XI SWAN 2017 Day 1 - Concurrent Sessions Wednesday, September 27, 2017 Question Title * 1. Title MD DO Resident DPM PA Nurse Practitioner Other Other (please specify) Question Title * 2. Was the content free of bias? Yes No If you selected No, please indicate bias perceived during this presentation. Today's activity included Morning and Afternoon Concurrent Sessions.Please ONLY EVALUATE THE SESSION WHICH YOU PARTICIPATED IN. Morning Session A: Quality Question Title * 3. Faculty Evaluation:Establishing a Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement Program in your NICU -- Gautham K. Suresh, MD, DM, MS, FAAP 1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent Quality of content Quality of content 1 = Poor Quality of content 2 Quality of content 3 Quality of content 4 Quality of content 5 = Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty 1 = Poor Expertise of the Faculty 2 Expertise of the Faculty 3 Expertise of the Faculty 4 Expertise of the Faculty 5 = Excellent Clarity and Organization Clarity and Organization 1 = Poor Clarity and Organization 2 Clarity and Organization 3 Clarity and Organization 4 Clarity and Organization 5 = Excellent Comment: Question Title * 4. Faculty Evaluation:Unity and Diversity in the NICU -- Venkataraman Balaraman, MD, MBBS 1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent Quality of content Quality of content 1 = Poor Quality of content 2 Quality of content 3 Quality of content 4 Quality of content 5 = Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty 1 = Poor Expertise of the Faculty 2 Expertise of the Faculty 3 Expertise of the Faculty 4 Expertise of the Faculty 5 = Excellent Clarity and Organization Clarity and Organization 1 = Poor Clarity and Organization 2 Clarity and Organization 3 Clarity and Organization 4 Clarity and Organization 5 = Excellent Comment: Morning Session B: Neonatal Imaging Question Title * 5. Faculty Evaluation:Fetal Imaging: Case Studies -- Nathan Drever, MD and Krista Birkemeier 1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent Quality of content Quality of content 1 = Poor Quality of content 2 Quality of content 3 Quality of content 4 Quality of content 5 = Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty 1 = Poor Expertise of the Faculty 2 Expertise of the Faculty 3 Expertise of the Faculty 4 Expertise of the Faculty 5 = Excellent Clarity and Organization Clarity and Organization 1 = Poor Clarity and Organization 2 Clarity and Organization 3 Clarity and Organization 4 Clarity and Organization 5 = Excellent Comment: Question Title * 6. Faculty Evaluation:Neonatal Imaging: Interactive Session -- Matthew Crisp, MD 1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent Quality of content Quality of content 1 = Poor Quality of content 2 Quality of content 3 Quality of content 4 Quality of content 5 = Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty 1 = Poor Expertise of the Faculty 2 Expertise of the Faculty 3 Expertise of the Faculty 4 Expertise of the Faculty 5 = Excellent Clarity and Organization Clarity and Organization 1 = Poor Clarity and Organization 2 Clarity and Organization 3 Clarity and Organization 4 Clarity and Organization 5 = Excellent Comment: Afternoon Session C: Nutrition Question Title * 7. Faculty Evaluation:Exclusive Human Milk Feeding -- Amy B. Hair, MD 1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent Quality of content Quality of content 1 = Poor Quality of content 2 Quality of content 3 Quality of content 4 Quality of content 5 = Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty 1 = Poor Expertise of the Faculty 2 Expertise of the Faculty 3 Expertise of the Faculty 4 Expertise of the Faculty 5 = Excellent Clarity and Organization Clarity and Organization 1 = Poor Clarity and Organization 2 Clarity and Organization 3 Clarity and Organization 4 Clarity and Organization 5 = Excellent Comment: Question Title * 8. Faculty Evaluation:Do We Really Know What We Are Feeding the Babies, Especially the Preterm Babies? -- Winston Koo, MD 1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent Quality of content Quality of content 1 = Poor Quality of content 2 Quality of content 3 Quality of content 4 Quality of content 5 = Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty 1 = Poor Expertise of the Faculty 2 Expertise of the Faculty 3 Expertise of the Faculty 4 Expertise of the Faculty 5 = Excellent Clarity and Organization Clarity and Organization 1 = Poor Clarity and Organization 2 Clarity and Organization 3 Clarity and Organization 4 Clarity and Organization 5 = Excellent Comment: Question Title * 9. Faculty Evaluation:Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: Clinical Implications in the NICU -- Jenny Reynolds, MSN, CCC-SLP, CLC 1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent Quality of content Quality of content 1 = Poor Quality of content 2 Quality of content 3 Quality of content 4 Quality of content 5 = Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty 1 = Poor Expertise of the Faculty 2 Expertise of the Faculty 3 Expertise of the Faculty 4 Expertise of the Faculty 5 = Excellent Clarity and Organization Clarity and Organization 1 = Poor Clarity and Organization 2 Clarity and Organization 3 Clarity and Organization 4 Clarity and Organization 5 = Excellent Comment: Question Title * 10. Nutrition Panel Evaluation:Nutrition Panelists: Dr. Hair, Dr. Abrams, J Reynolds, Dr. D'Apolito, Dr. Koo 1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent Quality of Panel Quality of Panel 1 = Poor Quality of Panel 2 Quality of Panel 3 Quality of Panel 4 Quality of Panel 5 = Excellent Audience engagement Audience engagement 1 = Poor Audience engagement 2 Audience engagement 3 Audience engagement 4 Audience engagement 5 = Excellent Teaching strategy was effective Teaching strategy was effective 1 = Poor Teaching strategy was effective 2 Teaching strategy was effective 3 Teaching strategy was effective 4 Teaching strategy was effective 5 = Excellent Comment: Afternoon Session D: Infections Question Title * 11. Faculty Evaluation:Neonatal Sepsis: Early and Late -- Pablo Sanchez, MD 1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent Quality of content Quality of content 1 = Poor Quality of content 2 Quality of content 3 Quality of content 4 Quality of content 5 = Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty 1 = Poor Expertise of the Faculty 2 Expertise of the Faculty 3 Expertise of the Faculty 4 Expertise of the Faculty 5 = Excellent Clarity and Organization Clarity and Organization 1 = Poor Clarity and Organization 2 Clarity and Organization 3 Clarity and Organization 4 Clarity and Organization 5 = Excellent Comment: Question Title * 12. Faculty Evaluation:Antibiotic Stewardship -- JB Cantey, MD 1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent Quality of Content Quality of Content 1 = Poor Quality of Content 2 Quality of Content 3 Quality of Content 4 Quality of Content 5 = Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty 1 = Poor Expertise of the Faculty 2 Expertise of the Faculty 3 Expertise of the Faculty 4 Expertise of the Faculty 5 = Excellent Clarity and Organization Clarity and Organization 1 = Poor Clarity and Organization 2 Clarity and Organization 3 Clarity and Organization 4 Clarity and Organization 5 = Excellent Comment: Question Title * 13. Faculty Evaluation:Perinatal Infections -- Nathan Drever, MD and Jessica Ehrig, MD 1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent Quality of Content Quality of Content 1 = Poor Quality of Content 2 Quality of Content 3 Quality of Content 4 Quality of Content 5 = Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty 1 = Poor Expertise of the Faculty 2 Expertise of the Faculty 3 Expertise of the Faculty 4 Expertise of the Faculty 5 = Excellent Clarity and Organization Clarity and Organization 1 = Poor Clarity and Organization 2 Clarity and Organization 3 Clarity and Organization 4 Clarity and Organization 5 = Excellent Comment: Question Title * 14. Faculty Evaluation:Infection Control Measures in NICU -- JB Cantey, MD 1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent Quality of Content Quality of Content 1 = Poor Quality of Content 2 Quality of Content 3 Quality of Content 4 Quality of Content 5 = Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty 1 = Poor Expertise of the Faculty 2 Expertise of the Faculty 3 Expertise of the Faculty 4 Expertise of the Faculty 5 = Excellent Clarity and Organization Clarity and Organization 1 = Poor Clarity and Organization 2 Clarity and Organization 3 Clarity and Organization 4 Clarity and Organization 5 = Excellent Comment: Question Title * 15. Infection Panel Evaluation:Infection Panelists: Dr. Sanchez, Dr. Cantey, Dr. Drever, Dr. Ehrig, Velda Vargas, Dr. Dubrocq 1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent Quality of Panel Quality of Panel 1 = Poor Quality of Panel 2 Quality of Panel 3 Quality of Panel 4 Quality of Panel 5 = Excellent Audience engagement Audience engagement 1 = Poor Audience engagement 2 Audience engagement 3 Audience engagement 4 Audience engagement 5 = Excellent Teaching strategy was effective Teaching strategy was effective 1 = Poor Teaching strategy was effective 2 Teaching strategy was effective 3 Teaching strategy was effective 4 Teaching strategy was effective 5 = Excellent Comment: Question Title * 16. Other Comments: Done
