ADC 2016

Question Title

1. Check appropriate title. (Required.)

MD/DO

ARNP/RN/NP

PT/DPT

AT/OT

Other (please specify)

Question Title

2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting. (Required.)

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Other (please specify)

Question Title

3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias? (Required.)

Yes

If no, please explain

Question Title

4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)
(Required.)

Yes

Question Title

5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Question Title

6. How well were the 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

	Significantly Met	Somewhat Met	Not Met
Evaluate and weigh multiple surgical treatment options for complex reconstructions	Evaluate and weigh multiple surgical treatment options for complex reconstructions Significantly Met	Evaluate and weigh multiple surgical treatment options for complex reconstructions Somewhat Met	Evaluate and weigh multiple surgical treatment options for complex reconstructions Not Met
Have a greater awareness of the latest technology available for difficult infection situations	Have a greater awareness of the latest technology available for difficult infection situations Significantly Met	Have a greater awareness of the latest technology available for difficult infection situations Somewhat Met	Have a greater awareness of the latest technology available for difficult infection situations Not Met
Cite the latest clinical findings on complex reconstruction outcome	Cite the latest clinical findings on complex reconstruction outcome Significantly Met	Cite the latest clinical findings on complex reconstruction outcome Somewhat Met	Cite the latest clinical findings on complex reconstruction outcome Not Met
Anticipate and be pro-active for common complex reconstruction post-operative complications	Anticipate and be pro-active for common complex reconstruction post-operative complications Significantly Met	Anticipate and be pro-active for common complex reconstruction post-operative complications Somewhat Met	Anticipate and be pro-active for common complex reconstruction post-operative complications Not Met

Question Title

7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course? (Required.)

Significantly Met

Somewhat Met

Not Met

We encourage you to expand on your answer below:

Question Title

8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice? (Required.)

This activity validated my current practice; no changes will be made.

Create/revise protcols, policies and/or procedures.

Change the management and/or treatment of my patients.

Other, please specify

Question Title

9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice: (Required.)

Very Relevant

Relevant

Somewhat Relevant

Not Very Relevant

Irrelevant

Please explain:

Question Title

10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakers
SESSION : COMPLEX KNEE RECONSTRUCTIONS

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Richard Carey-Smith, MD - Complex Reconstructions Around the Knee- Australian Experience	Richard Carey-Smith, MD - Complex Reconstructions Around the Knee- Australian Experience Excellent	Richard Carey-Smith, MD - Complex Reconstructions Around the Knee- Australian Experience Very Good	Richard Carey-Smith, MD - Complex Reconstructions Around the Knee- Australian Experience Good	Richard Carey-Smith, MD - Complex Reconstructions Around the Knee- Australian Experience Fair	Richard Carey-Smith, MD - Complex Reconstructions Around the Knee- Australian Experience Poor
Anna Kulidijan, MD - Complex Reconstructions Around the Knee- US Experience	Anna Kulidijan, MD - Complex Reconstructions Around the Knee- US Experience Excellent	Anna Kulidijan, MD - Complex Reconstructions Around the Knee- US Experience Very Good	Anna Kulidijan, MD - Complex Reconstructions Around the Knee- US Experience Good	Anna Kulidijan, MD - Complex Reconstructions Around the Knee- US Experience Fair	Anna Kulidijan, MD - Complex Reconstructions Around the Knee- US Experience Poor
Pietro Ruggieri, MD, PhD - Italian Megaprosthesis Experience: 3 Centers, Analysis, and Complications	Pietro Ruggieri, MD, PhD - Italian Megaprosthesis Experience: 3 Centers, Analysis, and Complications Excellent	Pietro Ruggieri, MD, PhD - Italian Megaprosthesis Experience: 3 Centers, Analysis, and Complications Very Good	Pietro Ruggieri, MD, PhD - Italian Megaprosthesis Experience: 3 Centers, Analysis, and Complications Good	Pietro Ruggieri, MD, PhD - Italian Megaprosthesis Experience: 3 Centers, Analysis, and Complications Fair	Pietro Ruggieri, MD, PhD - Italian Megaprosthesis Experience: 3 Centers, Analysis, and Complications Poor
Herrick J. Siegel, MD - Complications Around the Knee of Mega Implants	Herrick J. Siegel, MD - Complications Around the Knee of Mega Implants Excellent	Herrick J. Siegel, MD - Complications Around the Knee of Mega Implants Very Good	Herrick J. Siegel, MD - Complications Around the Knee of Mega Implants Good	Herrick J. Siegel, MD - Complications Around the Knee of Mega Implants Fair	Herrick J. Siegel, MD - Complications Around the Knee of Mega Implants Poor

Question Title

11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakers
SESSION : COMPLEX KNEE TREATMENT OPTIONS

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Jon Minter, DO - Soling Loosening and Fractures with Megaprosthesis	Jon Minter, DO - Soling Loosening and Fractures with Megaprosthesis Excellent	Jon Minter, DO - Soling Loosening and Fractures with Megaprosthesis Very Good	Jon Minter, DO - Soling Loosening and Fractures with Megaprosthesis Good	Jon Minter, DO - Soling Loosening and Fractures with Megaprosthesis Fair	Jon Minter, DO - Soling Loosening and Fractures with Megaprosthesis Poor
Judd Cummings, MD - Compress as Treatment Option and Results	Judd Cummings, MD - Compress as Treatment Option and Results Excellent	Judd Cummings, MD - Compress as Treatment Option and Results Very Good	Judd Cummings, MD - Compress as Treatment Option and Results Good	Judd Cummings, MD - Compress as Treatment Option and Results Fair	Judd Cummings, MD - Compress as Treatment Option and Results Poor
Richard Buch, MD - Fusion as Treatment Option for Failed Infections	Richard Buch, MD - Fusion as Treatment Option for Failed Infections Excellent	Richard Buch, MD - Fusion as Treatment Option for Failed Infections Very Good	Richard Buch, MD - Fusion as Treatment Option for Failed Infections Good	Richard Buch, MD - Fusion as Treatment Option for Failed Infections Fair	Richard Buch, MD - Fusion as Treatment Option for Failed Infections Poor
Janet D. Conway, MD - Fusion as Treatment Option and Indications	Janet D. Conway, MD - Fusion as Treatment Option and Indications Excellent	Janet D. Conway, MD - Fusion as Treatment Option and Indications Very Good	Janet D. Conway, MD - Fusion as Treatment Option and Indications Good	Janet D. Conway, MD - Fusion as Treatment Option and Indications Fair	Janet D. Conway, MD - Fusion as Treatment Option and Indications Poor
Brian de Beaubien, MD - Irrigation Treatment Option for Infections	Brian de Beaubien, MD - Irrigation Treatment Option for Infections Excellent	Brian de Beaubien, MD - Irrigation Treatment Option for Infections Very Good	Brian de Beaubien, MD - Irrigation Treatment Option for Infections Good	Brian de Beaubien, MD - Irrigation Treatment Option for Infections Fair	Brian de Beaubien, MD - Irrigation Treatment Option for Infections Poor
Jens Sass - Customizing Solutions Using 3-D Technology	Jens Sass - Customizing Solutions Using 3-D Technology Excellent	Jens Sass - Customizing Solutions Using 3-D Technology Very Good	Jens Sass - Customizing Solutions Using 3-D Technology Good	Jens Sass - Customizing Solutions Using 3-D Technology Fair	Jens Sass - Customizing Solutions Using 3-D Technology Poor

Question Title

12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakers
Session : EXPANDABLES

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Peter Steadman, MD - Application of Expandable Prosthesis and Complications	Peter Steadman, MD - Application of Expandable Prosthesis and Complications Excellent	Peter Steadman, MD - Application of Expandable Prosthesis and Complications Very Good	Peter Steadman, MD - Application of Expandable Prosthesis and Complications Good	Peter Steadman, MD - Application of Expandable Prosthesis and Complications Fair	Peter Steadman, MD - Application of Expandable Prosthesis and Complications Poor
Joseph Benevenia, MD - Expandable Prostheses: The Rutgers Experience	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Expandable Prostheses: The Rutgers Experience Excellent	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Expandable Prostheses: The Rutgers Experience Very Good	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Expandable Prostheses: The Rutgers Experience Good	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Expandable Prostheses: The Rutgers Experience Fair	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Expandable Prostheses: The Rutgers Experience Poor
Drs. Benevenia & Steadman - Is This Applicable for Adult Treatment?	Drs. Benevenia & Steadman - Is This Applicable for Adult Treatment? Excellent	Drs. Benevenia & Steadman - Is This Applicable for Adult Treatment? Very Good	Drs. Benevenia & Steadman - Is This Applicable for Adult Treatment? Good	Drs. Benevenia & Steadman - Is This Applicable for Adult Treatment? Fair	Drs. Benevenia & Steadman - Is This Applicable for Adult Treatment? Poor
Seth Gasser, MD - Articular Cartilage Injuries	Seth Gasser, MD - Articular Cartilage Injuries Excellent	Seth Gasser, MD - Articular Cartilage Injuries Very Good	Seth Gasser, MD - Articular Cartilage Injuries Good	Seth Gasser, MD - Articular Cartilage Injuries Fair	Seth Gasser, MD - Articular Cartilage Injuries Poor

Question Title

13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakers
SESSION : CHAIRMEN CHOICE PRESENTATIONS

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Georg Gosheger, MD - Clinical Outcomes of Silver	Georg Gosheger, MD - Clinical Outcomes of Silver Excellent	Georg Gosheger, MD - Clinical Outcomes of Silver Very Good	Georg Gosheger, MD - Clinical Outcomes of Silver Good	Georg Gosheger, MD - Clinical Outcomes of Silver Fair	Georg Gosheger, MD - Clinical Outcomes of Silver Poor
Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - Strategies and Indications of When to Use Silver	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - Strategies and Indications of When to Use Silver Excellent	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - Strategies and Indications of When to Use Silver Very Good	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - Strategies and Indications of When to Use Silver Good	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - Strategies and Indications of When to Use Silver Fair	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - Strategies and Indications of When to Use Silver Poor
Lee Jeys, MD - Is all Silver the Same? Experience with Two Silver Types	Lee Jeys, MD - Is all Silver the Same? Experience with Two Silver Types Excellent	Lee Jeys, MD - Is all Silver the Same? Experience with Two Silver Types Very Good	Lee Jeys, MD - Is all Silver the Same? Experience with Two Silver Types Good	Lee Jeys, MD - Is all Silver the Same? Experience with Two Silver Types Fair	Lee Jeys, MD - Is all Silver the Same? Experience with Two Silver Types Poor
Pietro Ruggieri, MD, PhD - Infection Megaprosthesis: Update on Current Treatment	Pietro Ruggieri, MD, PhD - Infection Megaprosthesis: Update on Current Treatment Excellent	Pietro Ruggieri, MD, PhD - Infection Megaprosthesis: Update on Current Treatment Very Good	Pietro Ruggieri, MD, PhD - Infection Megaprosthesis: Update on Current Treatment Good	Pietro Ruggieri, MD, PhD - Infection Megaprosthesis: Update on Current Treatment Fair	Pietro Ruggieri, MD, PhD - Infection Megaprosthesis: Update on Current Treatment Poor

Question Title

14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakers
SESSION : RYDER CUP POINT/COUNTER-POINT COMPETITION

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Lee Jeys, MD - 1. Infected Joints: Single Exchange	Lee Jeys, MD - 1. Infected Joints: Single Exchange Excellent	Lee Jeys, MD - 1. Infected Joints: Single Exchange Very Good	Lee Jeys, MD - 1. Infected Joints: Single Exchange Good	Lee Jeys, MD - 1. Infected Joints: Single Exchange Fair	Lee Jeys, MD - 1. Infected Joints: Single Exchange Poor
Matthew Seidel, MD - 1. Infected Joints: vs. 2 Stage Gold Standard	Matthew Seidel, MD - 1. Infected Joints: vs. 2 Stage Gold Standard Excellent	Matthew Seidel, MD - 1. Infected Joints: vs. 2 Stage Gold Standard Very Good	Matthew Seidel, MD - 1. Infected Joints: vs. 2 Stage Gold Standard Good	Matthew Seidel, MD - 1. Infected Joints: vs. 2 Stage Gold Standard Fair	Matthew Seidel, MD - 1. Infected Joints: vs. 2 Stage Gold Standard Poor
Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - 2. Acetabular Treatments for Paprosky IIIA and B: Metal Megas	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - 2. Acetabular Treatments for Paprosky IIIA and B: Metal Megas Excellent	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - 2. Acetabular Treatments for Paprosky IIIA and B: Metal Megas Very Good	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - 2. Acetabular Treatments for Paprosky IIIA and B: Metal Megas Good	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - 2. Acetabular Treatments for Paprosky IIIA and B: Metal Megas Fair	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - 2. Acetabular Treatments for Paprosky IIIA and B: Metal Megas Poor
Judd Cummings, MD - 2. Acetabular Treatments for Paprosky IIIA and B: vs. Biologics	Judd Cummings, MD - 2. Acetabular Treatments for Paprosky IIIA and B: vs. Biologics Excellent	Judd Cummings, MD - 2. Acetabular Treatments for Paprosky IIIA and B: vs. Biologics Very Good	Judd Cummings, MD - 2. Acetabular Treatments for Paprosky IIIA and B: vs. Biologics Good	Judd Cummings, MD - 2. Acetabular Treatments for Paprosky IIIA and B: vs. Biologics Fair	Judd Cummings, MD - 2. Acetabular Treatments for Paprosky IIIA and B: vs. Biologics Poor
Peter Steadman, MD - 3. Cancer Protocols- Timing of Implantation: Standard Protocols (chemo-resect-implant-chemo)	Peter Steadman, MD - 3. Cancer Protocols- Timing of Implantation: Standard Protocols (chemo-resect-implant-chemo) Excellent	Peter Steadman, MD - 3. Cancer Protocols- Timing of Implantation: Standard Protocols (chemo-resect-implant-chemo) Very Good	Peter Steadman, MD - 3. Cancer Protocols- Timing of Implantation: Standard Protocols (chemo-resect-implant-chemo) Good	Peter Steadman, MD - 3. Cancer Protocols- Timing of Implantation: Standard Protocols (chemo-resect-implant-chemo) Fair	Peter Steadman, MD - 3. Cancer Protocols- Timing of Implantation: Standard Protocols (chemo-resect-implant-chemo) Poor
Herrick J. Siegel, MD - 3. Cancer Protocols- Timing of Implantation: vs. Implant Much Later	Herrick J. Siegel, MD - 3. Cancer Protocols- Timing of Implantation: vs. Implant Much Later Excellent	Herrick J. Siegel, MD - 3. Cancer Protocols- Timing of Implantation: vs. Implant Much Later Very Good	Herrick J. Siegel, MD - 3. Cancer Protocols- Timing of Implantation: vs. Implant Much Later Good	Herrick J. Siegel, MD - 3. Cancer Protocols- Timing of Implantation: vs. Implant Much Later Fair	Herrick J. Siegel, MD - 3. Cancer Protocols- Timing of Implantation: vs. Implant Much Later Poor
Edward C. Cheng, - 4. Ethical/Moral Dilemma vs Cost Considerations	Edward C. Cheng, - 4. Ethical/Moral Dilemma vs Cost Considerations Excellent	Edward C. Cheng, - 4. Ethical/Moral Dilemma vs Cost Considerations Very Good	Edward C. Cheng, - 4. Ethical/Moral Dilemma vs Cost Considerations Good	Edward C. Cheng, - 4. Ethical/Moral Dilemma vs Cost Considerations Fair	Edward C. Cheng, - 4. Ethical/Moral Dilemma vs Cost Considerations Poor

Question Title

15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakers
SESSION : X-RAY RYDER CUP

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
1. Ryder Cup: Worst Case Competition	1. Ryder Cup: Worst Case Competition Excellent	1. Ryder Cup: Worst Case Competition Very Good	1. Ryder Cup: Worst Case Competition Good	1. Ryder Cup: Worst Case Competition Fair	1. Ryder Cup: Worst Case Competition Poor
2. Ryder Cup: Innovative Treatments Done ( Are You Our of Your Mind?!)	2. Ryder Cup: Innovative Treatments Done ( Are You Our of Your Mind?!) Excellent	2. Ryder Cup: Innovative Treatments Done ( Are You Our of Your Mind?!) Very Good	2. Ryder Cup: Innovative Treatments Done ( Are You Our of Your Mind?!) Good	2. Ryder Cup: Innovative Treatments Done ( Are You Our of Your Mind?!) Fair	2. Ryder Cup: Innovative Treatments Done ( Are You Our of Your Mind?!) Poor
3. Ryder Cup: Open Cases- What Would You Do?	3. Ryder Cup: Open Cases- What Would You Do? Excellent	3. Ryder Cup: Open Cases- What Would You Do? Very Good	3. Ryder Cup: Open Cases- What Would You Do? Good	3. Ryder Cup: Open Cases- What Would You Do? Fair	3. Ryder Cup: Open Cases- What Would You Do? Poor

Question Title

16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakers
SESSION : COMPLEX HIP RECONSTRUCTIVE OPTIIONS and STRATEGIES

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Joseph Benevenia, MD - Extreme Bone Loss Options	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Extreme Bone Loss Options Excellent	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Extreme Bone Loss Options Very Good	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Extreme Bone Loss Options Good	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Extreme Bone Loss Options Fair	Joseph Benevenia, MD - Extreme Bone Loss Options Poor
Matthew J. Siedel, MD - Alternative Treatment Options for Pelvic Defects- Harrington Experience	Matthew J. Siedel, MD - Alternative Treatment Options for Pelvic Defects- Harrington Experience Excellent	Matthew J. Siedel, MD - Alternative Treatment Options for Pelvic Defects- Harrington Experience Very Good	Matthew J. Siedel, MD - Alternative Treatment Options for Pelvic Defects- Harrington Experience Good	Matthew J. Siedel, MD - Alternative Treatment Options for Pelvic Defects- Harrington Experience Fair	Matthew J. Siedel, MD - Alternative Treatment Options for Pelvic Defects- Harrington Experience Poor
Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - Indications and Treatment for Partial Pelvic Defects- Pedestal Cups	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - Indications and Treatment for Partial Pelvic Defects- Pedestal Cups Excellent	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - Indications and Treatment for Partial Pelvic Defects- Pedestal Cups Very Good	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - Indications and Treatment for Partial Pelvic Defects- Pedestal Cups Good	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - Indications and Treatment for Partial Pelvic Defects- Pedestal Cups Fair	Fabrice Fiorenza, MD - Indications and Treatment for Partial Pelvic Defects- Pedestal Cups Poor
Jon Minter, Do - Periprosthetic Fractures and Mega Prosthesis of the Hip	Jon Minter, Do - Periprosthetic Fractures and Mega Prosthesis of the Hip Excellent	Jon Minter, Do - Periprosthetic Fractures and Mega Prosthesis of the Hip Very Good	Jon Minter, Do - Periprosthetic Fractures and Mega Prosthesis of the Hip Good	Jon Minter, Do - Periprosthetic Fractures and Mega Prosthesis of the Hip Fair	Jon Minter, Do - Periprosthetic Fractures and Mega Prosthesis of the Hip Poor

Question Title

17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakers
SESSION : UPPER EXTREMITY COMPLEX RECONSTRUCTION OPTIONS and STRATEGIES

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Wayne Burkhead, MD - Reconstruction of Shoulders and Infections	Wayne Burkhead, MD - Reconstruction of Shoulders and Infections Excellent	Wayne Burkhead, MD - Reconstruction of Shoulders and Infections Very Good	Wayne Burkhead, MD - Reconstruction of Shoulders and Infections Good	Wayne Burkhead, MD - Reconstruction of Shoulders and Infections Fair	Wayne Burkhead, MD - Reconstruction of Shoulders and Infections Poor
John Itamura, MD - Are Too Many Reverses Being Done, and Problems It is Causing	John Itamura, MD - Are Too Many Reverses Being Done, and Problems It is Causing Excellent	John Itamura, MD - Are Too Many Reverses Being Done, and Problems It is Causing Very Good	John Itamura, MD - Are Too Many Reverses Being Done, and Problems It is Causing Good	John Itamura, MD - Are Too Many Reverses Being Done, and Problems It is Causing Fair	John Itamura, MD - Are Too Many Reverses Being Done, and Problems It is Causing Poor
Drs. Burkhead & Itamura - Discussion: Has Proprionbacter Changes Treatment Options?	Drs. Burkhead & Itamura - Discussion: Has Proprionbacter Changes Treatment Options? Excellent	Drs. Burkhead & Itamura - Discussion: Has Proprionbacter Changes Treatment Options? Very Good	Drs. Burkhead & Itamura - Discussion: Has Proprionbacter Changes Treatment Options? Good	Drs. Burkhead & Itamura - Discussion: Has Proprionbacter Changes Treatment Options? Fair	Drs. Burkhead & Itamura - Discussion: Has Proprionbacter Changes Treatment Options? Poor
Richard Carey-Smith, MD - Upper Extremity Experience and Complications	Richard Carey-Smith, MD - Upper Extremity Experience and Complications Excellent	Richard Carey-Smith, MD - Upper Extremity Experience and Complications Very Good	Richard Carey-Smith, MD - Upper Extremity Experience and Complications Good	Richard Carey-Smith, MD - Upper Extremity Experience and Complications Fair	Richard Carey-Smith, MD - Upper Extremity Experience and Complications Poor
Georg Gosheger, MD - Munster Experience of Complex Shoulder Problems	Georg Gosheger, MD - Munster Experience of Complex Shoulder Problems Excellent	Georg Gosheger, MD - Munster Experience of Complex Shoulder Problems Very Good	Georg Gosheger, MD - Munster Experience of Complex Shoulder Problems Good	Georg Gosheger, MD - Munster Experience of Complex Shoulder Problems Fair	Georg Gosheger, MD - Munster Experience of Complex Shoulder Problems Poor

Question Title

18. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakers
SESSION : CHAIRMEN CHOICE PRESENTATIONS

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Richard Buch, MD - Review of Tests and New Labs Available for Detection and Workup	Richard Buch, MD - Review of Tests and New Labs Available for Detection and Workup Excellent	Richard Buch, MD - Review of Tests and New Labs Available for Detection and Workup Very Good	Richard Buch, MD - Review of Tests and New Labs Available for Detection and Workup Good	Richard Buch, MD - Review of Tests and New Labs Available for Detection and Workup Fair	Richard Buch, MD - Review of Tests and New Labs Available for Detection and Workup Poor
Janet D. Conway, MD - Concepts on the Prevention of Infection and the Megaprosthesis	Janet D. Conway, MD - Concepts on the Prevention of Infection and the Megaprosthesis Excellent	Janet D. Conway, MD - Concepts on the Prevention of Infection and the Megaprosthesis Very Good	Janet D. Conway, MD - Concepts on the Prevention of Infection and the Megaprosthesis Good	Janet D. Conway, MD - Concepts on the Prevention of Infection and the Megaprosthesis Fair	Janet D. Conway, MD - Concepts on the Prevention of Infection and the Megaprosthesis Poor
Jon MInter, DO - Double Set-Up Technique to Prevent Infection	Jon MInter, DO - Double Set-Up Technique to Prevent Infection Excellent	Jon MInter, DO - Double Set-Up Technique to Prevent Infection Very Good	Jon MInter, DO - Double Set-Up Technique to Prevent Infection Good	Jon MInter, DO - Double Set-Up Technique to Prevent Infection Fair	Jon MInter, DO - Double Set-Up Technique to Prevent Infection Poor
Richard Buch, MD - When to Say NO to a Reconstruction	Richard Buch, MD - When to Say NO to a Reconstruction Excellent	Richard Buch, MD - When to Say NO to a Reconstruction Very Good	Richard Buch, MD - When to Say NO to a Reconstruction Good	Richard Buch, MD - When to Say NO to a Reconstruction Fair	Richard Buch, MD - When to Say NO to a Reconstruction Poor

Question Title

19. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

20. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

21. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

22. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Direct Mail

Eblast

Phone Call

Course Catalog

Orthopedics Today/Orthopedics Ad

Social Media (Facebook/Twitter)

Referral (Please list below)

Other (please specify)

Question Title

23. Please provide your contact information. (Required.)

Full Name:

Degree:

Email Address:

Phone Number:

Question Title

24. FORE is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

FORE designates this live activity for a maximum of 15AMA PRA Category 1 Credits^TM.Physicians should only claim the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Please attest to the total number of credit hours (minimum .25- maximum 15) that you spent in this CME activity: (Required.)

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title. (Required.)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting. (Required.)

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest. Was this CME course free of commercial bias? (Required.)

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support? (One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides) (Required.)

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Question Title

* 6. How well were the 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference course objectives met?Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course? (Required.)

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice? (Required.)

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice: (Required.)

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakersSESSION : COMPLEX KNEE RECONSTRUCTIONS

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakersSESSION : COMPLEX KNEE TREATMENT OPTIONS

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakers Session : EXPANDABLES

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakersSESSION : CHAIRMEN CHOICE PRESENTATIONS

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakersSESSION : RYDER CUP POINT/COUNTER-POINT COMPETITION

Question Title

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakersSESSION : X-RAY RYDER CUP

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakersSESSION : COMPLEX HIP RECONSTRUCTIVE OPTIIONS and STRATEGIES

Question Title

* 17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakersSESSION : UPPER EXTREMITY COMPLEX RECONSTRUCTION OPTIONS and STRATEGIES

Question Title

* 18. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakersSESSION : CHAIRMEN CHOICE PRESENTATIONS

Question Title

* 19. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 20. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 21. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 22. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Question Title

* 23. Please provide your contact information. (Required.)

Question Title

1. Check appropriate title. (Required.)

2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting. (Required.)

3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias? (Required.)

4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)
(Required.)

5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

6. How well were the 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course? (Required.)

8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice? (Required.)

9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice: (Required.)

10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakers
SESSION : COMPLEX KNEE RECONSTRUCTIONS

11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakers
SESSION : COMPLEX KNEE TREATMENT OPTIONS

12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakers
Session : EXPANDABLES

13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakers
SESSION : CHAIRMEN CHOICE PRESENTATIONS

14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakers
SESSION : RYDER CUP POINT/COUNTER-POINT COMPETITION

15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakers
SESSION : X-RAY RYDER CUP

16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakers
SESSION : COMPLEX HIP RECONSTRUCTIVE OPTIIONS and STRATEGIES

17. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakers
SESSION : UPPER EXTREMITY COMPLEX RECONSTRUCTION OPTIONS and STRATEGIES

18. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our 2nd Biennial Arthroplasty Disaster International Conference speakers
SESSION : CHAIRMEN CHOICE PRESENTATIONS

19. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

20. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

21. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

22. How did you hear about this CME Program?

23. Please provide your contact information. (Required.)