Post Site Visit Questionnaire (PSQ) 2025

Feedback about the Site Visit

100% of survey complete.

The Committee on Accreditation for Educational Programs for the Emergency Medical Services Professions (CoAEMSP) continuously strives to improve its accreditation process and increase the quality of it for the educational institutions it serves. An integral step in the quality assurance process is obtaining valid feedback from the program director and the dean.

Thank you for completing this questionnaire and assisting with the quality assurance process.

Question Title

* 1. Please provide the program name and location.

Name:

Program Sponsor:

Program Director or Dean Equivalent (type position):

City/Town:

State:

Program Number (60xxxx):

Question Title

* 2. Did the site visit team captain contact the program director within two weeks of receiving the confirmation of the site visit email that identified the site visit team members and instructions?

Yes

Question Title

* 3. Did the site visit team captain arrange a conference call in a timely manner to discuss the site visit logistics, provide information to assist with preparation, and answer questions?

Yes

Question Title

* 4. Was the team captain available to the program via email or conference call if needed prior to the site visit in a timely manner?

Yes

Question Title

* 5. Did the team captain remind the program director near the due date regarding the documents required to be uploaded to the CoAEMSP Sharefile?

Yes

Question Title

* 6. Was it apparent that the site visit team had reviewed the program’s Self-Study Report and associated materials prior to the site visit?

Yes

Question Title

* 7. Did the site visit team keep the program director updated during the site visit?

Yes

Question Title

* 8. Were the site visitors objective and unbiased?

Yes

Question Title

* 9. Did the site visit team refrain from detailing specifics regarding their program and instead focus on general information on ways to meet the accreditation standards?

Yes

Question Title

* 10. Did the site visit team provide helpful information on best practices?

Yes

Question Title

* 11. Did the site visit team provide an open and non-threatening environment for discussion?

Yes

Question Title

* 12. Did the site visit team explain the next steps in the accreditation review process (i.e., confirmation of factual accuracy, response to the findings letter, review by the CoAEMSP Board, and CAAHEP action)?

Yes

Question Title

* 1. Please provide the program name and location.

Question Title

* 2. Did the site visit team captain contact the program director within two weeks of receiving the confirmation of the site visit email that identified the site visit team members and instructions?

Question Title

* 3. Did the site visit team captain arrange a conference call in a timely manner to discuss the site visit logistics, provide information to assist with preparation, and answer questions?

Question Title

* 4. Was the team captain available to the program via email or conference call if needed prior to the site visit in a timely manner?

Question Title

* 5. Did the team captain remind the program director near the due date regarding the documents required to be uploaded to the CoAEMSP Sharefile?

Question Title

* 6. Was it apparent that the site visit team had reviewed the program’s Self-Study Report and associated materials prior to the site visit?

Question Title

* 7. Did the site visit team keep the program director updated during the site visit?

Question Title

* 8. Were the site visitors objective and unbiased?

Question Title

* 9. Did the site visit team refrain from detailing specifics regarding their program and instead focus on general information on ways to meet the accreditation standards?

Question Title

* 10. Did the site visit team provide helpful information on best practices?

Question Title

* 11. Did the site visit team provide an open and non-threatening environment for discussion?

Question Title

* 12. Did the site visit team explain the next steps in the accreditation review process (i.e., confirmation of factual accuracy, response to the findings letter, review by the CoAEMSP Board, and CAAHEP action)?

Question Title

* 13. What are suggestions for improvement with the site visit process?