Screen Reader Mode Icon

Attendees must complete items 1-50. Providers submitting CMEs must also complete items 51-71.

We value your feedback. Please complete our session evaluation! Families and participants (and anyone submitting their hours to ASHA, AOTA, CDR, EI) please complete items 1-50, then scroll to the bottom and submit your survey!

Providers looking for CMEs for AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™ must also complete items 51-71.

Question Title

* 1. What is your name? This field is required to receive continuing education credit.

Question Title

* 2. Are you an Occupational Therapist or OTA?

Question Title

* 3. Are you an Speech Language Pathologist wanting to submit your hours to ASHA?

Question Title

* 4. Are you a dietician/nutritionist wanting to submit CPEUs to the Commission on Dietetic Registration?

Question Title

* 5. Are you a medical doctor (MD) wanting to report CMEs to your accrediting body?

Question Title

* 6. Years of Professional Experience (please circle):

Please provide feedback for individual sessions and speakers below. Please do not score sessions you did not attend.

Question Title

* 7. Wednesday at 11:30am ET

The Power of Two: The effects and outcomes of peer-to-peer mentorship on maternal mental health while navigating pediatric feeding disorder

Jena Twete, MS, CSCS
Cassidy Martinez, RN, BSN

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 8. The Shannon Goldwater Summit for Change: The Right Care for the Right Child at the Right Time

Toneisha Bush, MA, CCC-SLP Cuyler Romeo, MOT, OTR/L, SCFES, IBCLC Jenny McGlothlin, MS, CCC/SLP, CLC Ruth Bourque, MS, OTR/L Dana Kizer, MS, OTR/L, BCP, Family Advocate Amber Mieras, FAC Chair, Parent of Child with PFD Deanna Montalbano, Content Expert- Billing and Finance Grant Morris, MD, MPH, FAAP, FAC member, Parent of Child with PFD

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 9. Billions of Neurons in Your Pocket: Harnessing the power of neuroscience to improve PFD treatment

Georgia Malandraki, PhD, CCC-SLP, BCS-S, F-ASHA

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 10. PFD in Infancy: Effects of infant-Driven Feeding in the NICU for Premature Infants with Comorbidities

Courtney Green, MS, CF-SLP

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 11. PFD in Infancy: Physiological Measures of Breastfeeding: A comparison between term vs pre-term infants

Buddhika Prasangi, BSc Honours; Isuru Dharmarathna, PhD

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 12. PFD in Infancy: Feeding Challenges for Infants of Diabetic Mothers, A Research Review

Leslie-Anne Dietrich, MD, IBCLC; Melanie Van Hoy, MS, CCC-SLP, CLC, CNT, NTMTC

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 13. Evaluating PFD: Discriminant Validity of the Environment, Attitudes, Temperament, Sensory (EATS)

Blair Carsone, PhD, MOT, OTR/L; Bryce Smith, OTD, OTR/L

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 14. Evaluating PFD: Psychometric Properties of SMART Feeding Tool: An interprofessional research study

Anne Albi, MS, CCC-SLP, IBCLC; Ravi Mishra, MD, FAAP; Cynthia Lira-Crame, MSN, RNC-NIC,
NPD-BC

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 15. Evaluating PFD: Comorbidities in Paediatric Feeding Disorders

Natalie Morris, MSc, BA (Hons) (SLP); Lucy Bates, Bsc (Hons) (OT); Hannah Daw, MSc (RD)

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 16. Removing Barriers: Social determinants of health and NICU parent feeding practices

Stefanie LaManna, MS, CCC-SLP, CNT; Brooke Hatfield, MS, CCC-SLP

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 17. School Meals for Students with Disabilities: Beyond nutrition

Lily Gullion, OTR/L (PhD Student)

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 18. Distilling Wisdom: Tube-Positive teaching by carers, for carers

Chris Elliot, B.Med (Hons) FRACP; Anna Ierardo, Parent; Nick Hopwood, BA (Hons) MsC PhD MD
(Honoris Causa)

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 19. Addressing Families’ Understanding of Pediatric Feeding Disorders

Adina Seidenfeld, PhD

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 20. Building Consensus: ARFID & PFD

Hayley Estrem, PhD, RN; Pamela Dodrill, PhD; Jenny Thomas, PhD, FAED; Will Sharp, PhD

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 21. 5 minute Lightning Talk: Important Evidence-Based Practice Factors to Consider in Pediatric Feeding Disorders

Ross Westemeyer, PhD, CCC-SLP

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 22. 5 minute Lightning Talk: Using Parent-Reported Tools in Assessment for Pediatric Feeding Disorder (PFD)

Jeanne Marshall, PhD, B Sp Path

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 23. 5 minute Lightning Talk: Examining the Association Between Maternal Postpartum Stress and Infant Non-Nutritive Suck

Alaina Martens, MS, CCC-SLP (PhD Student)

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 24. 5 minute Lightning Talk: Mealtime Reimagined: Initiating a sensory feeding group with medically complex children

Stephanie Waters, MS, CCC-SLP, CLC; Elizabeth Curney, MS, OTR/L

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 25. 5 minute Lightning Talk: Chewing in Minimally Verbal and Verbal Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Emily Moran, SLP-CF

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 26. 5 minute Lightning Talk: Health-Related Quality of Life of Parents of Children with Pediatric Feeding Disorders

Nadeesha Nirmani, BSc Honours (SLP); Isuru Dharmarathna, PhD

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 27. 5 minute Lightning Talk: Feeding Therapy Interventions and Frequency of Use: A pilot study

Michelle Beechamp, OTD, OTR/L (co-authors: Ronise Benson, OTD/S; Madison Farmer, OTD/S)

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 28. The 2024 Feeding Matters Annual PFD Alliance Symposium: Exploring an education pathway for pediatric feeding disorder

Cuyler Romeo, MOT, OTR/L, SCFES, IBCLC; Amy Delaney, PhD; Amber Mieras, Parent, FAC Chair; Paula Rabaey, PhD; Erin Ross, PhD

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 29. Perspectives in PFD: Harmonizing Feeding Therapy with Different Cognitive Developmental Stages in Pediatric Feeding Disorders

Kelly Fitzpatrick, CCC-SLP, CLC; Lindsay Beckerman, MOT, OTR/L

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 30. Perspectives in PFD: Clinical Insights and Caregiver Voices: Home-based medically-complex tube weaning

Brianna Miluk, MS, CCC-SLP; Denise Clark, Parent

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 31. Perspectives in PFD: ABA's Role in Feeding 101

Theresa Bartholomew, BCBA

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 32. Delivering PFD Services: Virtual Family-Based Care for Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder

Jessie Menzel, PhD

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 33. Delivering PFD Services: Meeting Halfway: A multidisciplinary approach to PFD treatment in children with autism

Emily Bragg, MS, CCC-SLP; Jessica Owens, CPNP-PC; Sharon Wallace, RD, CSP, LDN

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 34. Delivering PFD Services: Addressing PFD in Neurodiverse Children in Schools: Success stories and lessons learned

Margaryta Kuzmin, MA, CCC-SLP, TSSLD-BE

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 35. GI Didn't Think About That! Factors to Consider When Starting Feeding Therapy

Kristine Perez, MS, CCC-SLP; Jessica Martin, MS, OTR/L, CLT, CLC; Stephanie Kern, MS, OTR/L, CLC

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 36. Role of Blenderized Tube Feeding in Pediatric Feeding

Liz Evenson, MS, RD, LD, CLC

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 37. Interoception as a Feeding Foundation: Considering the complexities of internal cue responses

Cassaundra Corbett Miller, EdD, MS, CCC/SLP; Amy Kurowski-Burt, EdD, MOT, OTR/L

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 38. EoE: More than just alphabet soup

Emily McGowan, MD, PhD; Tegan Medico, MS, MPH, RDN, CNSC

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 39. 5 minute Lightning Talk: Feeding Characteristics and Behaviors in Young Children with Food Allergies

Jennifer Kefford, MSLP

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 40. 5 minute Lightning Talk: A Model for PFD Education in SLP Graduate Students: Knowledge and skills

Cindy Lund, PhD, CCC-SLP, C/NDT

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 41. 5 minute Lightning Talk: Factors Associated with Thickened Feedings and Its Impact at 1-2 months Post-Term

Suzanne Thoyre, PhD, RN, FAAN

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 42. 5 minute Lightning Talk: FEEDS: A transdisciplinary approach to navigating early childhood feeding challenges

Isabella Herold, MPH, RDN, CDN, CLC; Madeleine Amdur, LCSW, MPH; Anya Holit-Gsell, LMSW; Nazish Pervez, RD, CDN, CLC

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 43. 5 minute Lightning Talk: The Effectiveness of a 12 week feeding program emphasizing parental-clinician collaboration

Ida Barresi, MA, CCC-SLP

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 44. 5 minute Lightning Talk: Feeding a Short Gut: A clinician/parent perspective

Meagan Short, CCC-SLP

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 45. 5 minute Lightning Talk: Screening For Pediatric Feeding Disorder: Identifying patients at risk for PFD at the pediatrician's office

Lauren Hamilton, MD Student, Class of 2026

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The speaker(s) was knowledgeable.
The speaker(s) presented in a manner that was easy to understand.
The speaker(s) was responsive to questions and encouraged discussion.
The handouts/resources for this presentation are comprehensive and easily understood.
Videos and/or case studies shared by the presenter were beneficial and supported learning outcomes.
The virtual learning environment met my learning needs.
I learned techniques to immediately implement in practice.

Question Title

* 46. Are there topics related to PFD that you would like to learn about during future Feeding Matters events?

Question Title

* 47. How do you intend to immediately implement knowledge learned from this conference?

Question Title

* 48. Please share a highlight and/or an opportunity for growth as we are always looking for your valuable feedback! Thank you so much for attending!

Question Title

* 49. We strive to have a unique community driven conference. What do you think makes our conference different than others and do you have any ideas on how we can make it more inclusive?

Question Title

* 50. Are you interested in attending the 2025 conference IN PERSON in Phoenix, AZ Friday and Saturday February 21-22, 2025?

Question Title

* 51. If you are not self reporting CMEs you can SKIP TO THE END and submit your survey by clicking on the green DONE button!

If you are looking to submit CMEs to for licensure, please enter the date and complete the following section.

Questions #51-70 are REQUIRED for CMEs

Date
Time

Question Title

* 52. How would you rate your overall satisfaction with this CME activity?

Question Title

* 53. How well did this CME activity meet your educational expectations?

Question Title

* 54. The content was appropriate.

Question Title

* 55. The topics were thoroughly covered.

Question Title

* 56. The material was well organized.

Question Title

* 57. The information will contribute to patient care.

Question Title

* 58. The virtual platform was easy to use.

Question Title

* 59. Were the individual learning objectives of this CME activity achieved?

Question Title

* 60. Based on what you learned in this activity, do you plan to change the strategies you implement in your practice (e.g., how you diagnose/manage patients, coordinate care, etc.)?

Question Title

* 61. Based on what you learned in this activity, do you plan to change what you do in practice (e.g., how you perform exams, instruct, counsel patients/families, etc.)?

Question Title

* 62. If YES to either of the above questions (#57 and #58), please identify any changes in practice that you plan to make:

Question Title

* 63. If NO (to #57 and #58) and you do not plan to make changes in practice, other than lack of time and resources, why not? (select all that apply).

Question Title

* 64. On a scale of 1 to 5, what was the return on your investment of time/effort for participating in this activity?

Question Title

* 65. Do you feel a commercial product, device, or service was inappropriately promoted in the educational content?

Question Title

* 66. Please rate the value of the inclusion of MOC points for participating in this activity.

Question Title

* 67. Has what you learned in this activity increased your confidence in evaluating patients?

Question Title

* 68. Would you recommend this activity to a colleague based on its impact on your practice/patient care?

Question Title

* 69. On a scale of 1 to 5, what is the likelihood that what you learned in this activity will result in improvement in your patients’ health status?

Question Title

* 70. Does participating in this CME activity give you any idea or opportunity to conduct a QI project?

Question Title

* 71. Will you use the information you learned in this activity to enhance any of the following:

0 of 71 answered
 

T