Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Question Title

* 6. How well were the Selby Spine course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

  Significantly Met Somewhat Met Not Met
Evaluate and discuss treatment options for complex and challenging deformity cases
Assess the current trends in imaging and emerging technologies
Compare evidence of cervical spine care options
Assess the general healthcare marketplace and legal landscape as it relates to spine surgery. 

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION I:  Future of Healthcare

  Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
Richard Fessler, MD - Update on Legislative Changes to National Healthcare: Q & A
Alex Gitelman, MD - Should I try for an APM or Stick with MIPPS?
Eric Muehlbauer, MD - Emerging Issues in Reimbursement Effort For Spine Procedures
Rick Sasso, MD - The Bundle Care Initiative: How it Relates to Spine Surgery

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION II: Session II - Cervical Spine Bison

  Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
Greg Mundis, MD - Should We All be Using Low Dose Total Body Imaging Technology for Spinal Alignment
Shay Bess, MD - One Should Always get a Full Body Scan Before any Spinal Procedure to Understand Spinal Alignment
Mark D. Hiatt, MD - That's Ridiculous. There are Only a Few Measurements that are Important and Why Waste Money and Resources?
Michael Hisey, MD - Cervical Disk Arthroplasty. What's Approved and are There Differences?
John Small, MD - Rebuttal: All Arthroplasty Devices Are the Same 
Sigurd Berven, MD - Robotics Are Here to Stay but There Differences in Design
Pierce Nunley, MD - Robotics are a Waste of Money and Will Go the Way of Typical Navigational Systems-In the Closet
Jean Jacques Abitbol, MD - Case Presentation and Discussion

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION III: Emerging Technologies

  Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
Richard Fessler, MD - Techiques of Dural Repair
Adam Bruggeman, MD - Disc Repair Technologies 
Paul Slosar, MD - Surfacing Technologies 
Ken Gall, PhD - Porous PEEK Technologies 
Shay Bess, MD - Is There Value in Surgery For Adult Spinal Deformity? 
Neel Anand, MD - MIS Techniques for Sagittal Plane Correction in Adult Degenerative Deformity

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION IV: Deformity

  Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
Tony Bozzio, MD - Should SI Joint Fusion be Done Routinely in Ones Spine Practice
Wellington Hsu, MD - No It Shouldn't: Only in Rare Cases
Sigurd Berven, MD - Sagittal Balance  
Reginald Davis, MD - MIS Will Replace Most Open Surgery in Deformity Procedures 
Alex Vaccaro, MD, PhD - MIS is a Passing Fad and it's Limitations Will Kill it in Deformity Procedures 
Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Is PSO Necessary or Too Morbid? 
John Small, MD - Case Presentation/ Discussion

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Selby Spine speakers
SESSION V: Biologics/My Worst Complications

  Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
Marc Weinstein, MD - Stem Cells for Bony Fusion: What Does the Data Say?
Wellington Hsu, MD - Bone Graft Technologies on the Horizon
Harvey Smith, MD - Intervertebral Disc Regeneration Strategies – Clinical Evidence
Andrew Utter, MD - Are allografts better than they used to be?

Question Title

* 15. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 16. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 17. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 18. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Question Title

* 19. Please provide your contact information.

Question Title

* 20. The Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education (FORE) is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

FORE designates this live activity for a maximum of 12.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)TM. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Please attest to the total number of credit hours (minimum .25- maximum 12.5) that you spent in this CME
activity:

T