A. Webb Roberts Center for Continuing Medical

XII SWAN 2018
 Day 2
Thursday, September  20, 2018

Today's activity included a dinner session.
Please ONLY EVALUATE THE SESSION WHICH YOU PARTICIPATED IN.
Respiratory Workshop

Question Title

* 3. Faculty Evaluation:
Non-invasive Ventilation (HCFNC/CPAP) - Dr. Ramanathan

  1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent
Quality of content
Expertise of the Faculty
Clarity and Organization

Question Title

* 4. Faculty Evaluation:
Neurally Adjusted Ventilation Assist (NAVA) - Dr. Stein

  1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent
Quality of content
Expertise of the Faculty
Clarity and Organization

Question Title

* 5. Faculty Evaluation:
European Concensus Guidelines for Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) and Surfactant Therapy - Dr. Sweet

  1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent
Quality of content
Expertise of the Faculty
Clarity and Organization

Question Title

* 6. Faculty Evaluation:
Ventilator Strategies for Severe - BPD - Dr. Yoder

  1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent
Quality of content
Expertise of the Faculty
Clarity and Organization

Question Title

* 7. Faculty Evaluation:
International Symposium Discussion BPD/CLD prevention

  1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent
Quality of panel
Engagement with the Audience
Teaching strategy was effective

Question Title

* 8. Faculty Evaluation:
Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA) to treat or not to treat - Dr. Shah

  1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent
Quality of panel
Engagement with the Audience
Teaching strategy was effective

Question Title

* 9. Faculty Evaluation:
Non-Invasive Ventilation (BiPAP/Duo PAP/NIMV) - Dr. Ramanathan

  1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent
Quality of panel
Engagement with the Audience
Teaching strategy was effective

Question Title

* 10. Faculty Evaluation:
Infections in the NICU, What is New - Dr. Pablo Sanchez

  1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent
Quality of panel
Engagement with the Audience
Teaching strategy was effective

Question Title

* 11. Faculty Evaluation:
Infections in the NICU, What is New - Dr. Pablo Sanchez

  1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent
Quality of panel
Engagement with the Audience
Teaching strategy was effective

Question Title

* 12. Faculty Evaluation:
Culture of culture negative sepsis & antiobiotic stewardship - Dr. Cantey

  1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent
Quality of panel
Engagement with the Audience
Teaching strategy was effective

Question Title

* 13. Faculty Evaluation:
Respiratory panel

  1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent
Quality of panel
Engagement with the Audience
Teaching strategy was effective
Nutrition & Feeding Workshop

Question Title

* 14. Faculty Evaluation:
When Milk is Not Milk: Distinguishing Between Mother's & Donor Milk & Other Human Milk - Dr. Hamilton Spence

  1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent
Quality of panel
Engagement with the Audience
Teaching strategy was effective

Question Title

* 15. Faculty Evaluation:
Pathophysiology of Dysphagia & Dysmotility in the NICU Infant: Role of Brian-Gut reflex integration - Dr. Jadcherla

  1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent
Quality of panel
Engagement with the Audience
Teaching strategy was effective

Question Title

* 16. Faculty Evaluation:
Feeding & Medications Strategies to Prevent TPN-Associated Cholestasis - Dr. Premkumar

  1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent
Quality of panel
Engagement with the Audience
Teaching strategy was effective

Question Title

* 17. Faculty Evaluation:
Feeding Conundrums: Preventive and Curative Strategies - Dr. Jadcherla

  1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent
Quality of panel
Engagement with the Audience
Teaching strategy was effective

Question Title

* 18. Faculty Evaluation:
Breastfeeding and Substance Abuse - Dr. Hale

  1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent
Quality of panel
Engagement with the Audience
Teaching strategy was effective

Question Title

* 19. Faculty Evaluation:
Calcium, Phosphorus, and Magnesium Metabolism in the Preterm & Term Newborn - Dr. Abrams

  1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent
Quality of panel
Engagement with the Audience
Teaching strategy was effective

Question Title

* 20. Faculty Evaluation:
Calcium, Phosphorus, and Magnesium Metabolism in the Preterm & Term Newborn - Dr. Abrams

  1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent
Quality of panel
Engagement with the Audience
Teaching strategy was effective

Question Title

* 21. Faculty Evaluation:
Sugar, Protein & Brain: NZ research making a difference in Neonatal Care - Dr. Nair

  1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent
Quality of panel
Engagement with the Audience
Teaching strategy was effective

Question Title

* 22. Faculty Evaluation:
I can't be fed that...Feeding in Special Conditions - Dr. Gibson

  1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent
Quality of panel
Engagement with the Audience
Teaching strategy was effective

Question Title

* 23. Faculty Evaluation:
Management of Short Gut - Dr. Stagg

  1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent
Quality of panel
Engagement with the Audience
Teaching strategy was effective

Question Title

* 24. Faculty Evaluation:
Nutrition Panel

  1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent
Quality of panel
Engagement with the Audience
Teaching strategy was effective
Andrew Messer Lectureship in Pediatric Neurology

Question Title

* 25. Faculty Evaluation:
The Saga of Neonatal Jaundice - Dr. Vinod K. Bhutani

  1 = Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent
Quality of content
Expertise of the Faculty
Clarity and Organization

Question Title

* 26. Other Comments:

T