2017 Castellvi Spine

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

MD/DO

ARNP/RN/NP

PT/DPT

AT/OT

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Yes

If no, please explain

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Yes

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Question Title

* 6. How well were the Castellvi Spine course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

	Significantly Met	Somewhat Met	Not Met
Assess and Critique emerging technologies in comparison to current treatment options	Assess and Critique emerging technologies in comparison to current treatment options Significantly Met	Assess and Critique emerging technologies in comparison to current treatment options Somewhat Met	Assess and Critique emerging technologies in comparison to current treatment options Not Met
Discuss adult deformity and complications	Discuss adult deformity and complications Significantly Met	Discuss adult deformity and complications Somewhat Met	Discuss adult deformity and complications Not Met
Understand the use of lumbar techniques in spine surgery	Understand the use of lumbar techniques in spine surgery Significantly Met	Understand the use of lumbar techniques in spine surgery Somewhat Met	Understand the use of lumbar techniques in spine surgery Not Met
Employ useful surgical techniques in total disc replacement surgery	Employ useful surgical techniques in total disc replacement surgery Significantly Met	Employ useful surgical techniques in total disc replacement surgery Somewhat Met	Employ useful surgical techniques in total disc replacement surgery Not Met
Apply decision making strategies to complex cervical and lumbar degenerative disc disease procedures	Apply decision making strategies to complex cervical and lumbar degenerative disc disease procedures Significantly Met	Apply decision making strategies to complex cervical and lumbar degenerative disc disease procedures Somewhat Met	Apply decision making strategies to complex cervical and lumbar degenerative disc disease procedures Not Met

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Significantly Met

Somewhat Met

Not Met

We encourage you to expand on your answer below:

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

This activity validated my current practice; no changes will be made.

Create/revise protcols, policies and/or procedures.

Change the management and/or treatment of my patients.

Other, please specify

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Very Relevant

Relevant

Somewhat Relevant

Not Very Relevant

Irrelevant

Please explain:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION I: HIGH TECH IMAGING; NAVIGATION AND ROBOTICS OUR NEW FUTURE

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Boyle Cheng, PhD - Biomechanical VMA	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Biomechanical VMA Excellent	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Biomechanical VMA Very Good	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Biomechanical VMA Good	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Biomechanical VMA Fair	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Biomechanical VMA Poor
Reginald Davis, MD - Clinical Value of VMA	Reginald Davis, MD - Clinical Value of VMA Excellent	Reginald Davis, MD - Clinical Value of VMA Very Good	Reginald Davis, MD - Clinical Value of VMA Good	Reginald Davis, MD - Clinical Value of VMA Fair	Reginald Davis, MD - Clinical Value of VMA Poor
- VMA Use in Your Practice	- VMA Use in Your Practice Excellent	- VMA Use in Your Practice Very Good	- VMA Use in Your Practice Good	- VMA Use in Your Practice Fair	- VMA Use in Your Practice Poor
- Sagittal & Spinal Balance Imaging	- Sagittal & Spinal Balance Imaging Excellent	- Sagittal & Spinal Balance Imaging Very Good	- Sagittal & Spinal Balance Imaging Good	- Sagittal & Spinal Balance Imaging Fair	- Sagittal & Spinal Balance Imaging Poor
Robert Isaacs, MD - Preop / Intraop Navigation	Robert Isaacs, MD - Preop / Intraop Navigation Excellent	Robert Isaacs, MD - Preop / Intraop Navigation Very Good	Robert Isaacs, MD - Preop / Intraop Navigation Good	Robert Isaacs, MD - Preop / Intraop Navigation Fair	Robert Isaacs, MD - Preop / Intraop Navigation Poor
Robert Isaacs, MD - Less Radiation and Image Guidance	Robert Isaacs, MD - Less Radiation and Image Guidance Excellent	Robert Isaacs, MD - Less Radiation and Image Guidance Very Good	Robert Isaacs, MD - Less Radiation and Image Guidance Good	Robert Isaacs, MD - Less Radiation and Image Guidance Fair	Robert Isaacs, MD - Less Radiation and Image Guidance Poor
Alejandro Castellvi, MD - Robotics	Alejandro Castellvi, MD - Robotics Excellent	Alejandro Castellvi, MD - Robotics Very Good	Alejandro Castellvi, MD - Robotics Good	Alejandro Castellvi, MD - Robotics Fair	Alejandro Castellvi, MD - Robotics Poor
Raphael Roybal, MD - Handheld Navigation	Raphael Roybal, MD - Handheld Navigation Excellent	Raphael Roybal, MD - Handheld Navigation Very Good	Raphael Roybal, MD - Handheld Navigation Good	Raphael Roybal, MD - Handheld Navigation Fair	Raphael Roybal, MD - Handheld Navigation Poor
Sheyan Armaghani, MD - Cellphone Technology and Programs for Deformity Surgery	Sheyan Armaghani, MD - Cellphone Technology and Programs for Deformity Surgery Excellent	Sheyan Armaghani, MD - Cellphone Technology and Programs for Deformity Surgery Very Good	Sheyan Armaghani, MD - Cellphone Technology and Programs for Deformity Surgery Good	Sheyan Armaghani, MD - Cellphone Technology and Programs for Deformity Surgery Fair	Sheyan Armaghani, MD - Cellphone Technology and Programs for Deformity Surgery Poor
William Welch, MD - Debate: Is There Value in Imaging? Cost vs. Risk :Pro	William Welch, MD - Debate: Is There Value in Imaging? Cost vs. Risk :Pro Excellent	William Welch, MD - Debate: Is There Value in Imaging? Cost vs. Risk :Pro Very Good	William Welch, MD - Debate: Is There Value in Imaging? Cost vs. Risk :Pro Good	William Welch, MD - Debate: Is There Value in Imaging? Cost vs. Risk :Pro Fair	William Welch, MD - Debate: Is There Value in Imaging? Cost vs. Risk :Pro Poor
Scott Webb, DO - Debate: Is There Value in Imaging? Cost vs. Risk Con	Scott Webb, DO - Debate: Is There Value in Imaging? Cost vs. Risk Con Excellent	Scott Webb, DO - Debate: Is There Value in Imaging? Cost vs. Risk Con Very Good	Scott Webb, DO - Debate: Is There Value in Imaging? Cost vs. Risk Con Good	Scott Webb, DO - Debate: Is There Value in Imaging? Cost vs. Risk Con Fair	Scott Webb, DO - Debate: Is There Value in Imaging? Cost vs. Risk Con Poor

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION II: LUMBAR

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Neel Anand, MD - Case Presentation; Point / Counterpoint	Neel Anand, MD - Case Presentation; Point / Counterpoint Excellent	Neel Anand, MD - Case Presentation; Point / Counterpoint Very Good	Neel Anand, MD - Case Presentation; Point / Counterpoint Good	Neel Anand, MD - Case Presentation; Point / Counterpoint Fair	Neel Anand, MD - Case Presentation; Point / Counterpoint Poor
Marc Weinstein, MD - Laminectomy	Marc Weinstein, MD - Laminectomy Excellent	Marc Weinstein, MD - Laminectomy Very Good	Marc Weinstein, MD - Laminectomy Good	Marc Weinstein, MD - Laminectomy Fair	Marc Weinstein, MD - Laminectomy Poor
Neel Anand, MD - Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF)	Neel Anand, MD - Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) Excellent	Neel Anand, MD - Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) Very Good	Neel Anand, MD - Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) Good	Neel Anand, MD - Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) Fair	Neel Anand, MD - Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) Poor
Rick Hynes, MD - Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF)	Rick Hynes, MD - Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) Excellent	Rick Hynes, MD - Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) Very Good	Rick Hynes, MD - Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) Good	Rick Hynes, MD - Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) Fair	Rick Hynes, MD - Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) Poor
William Tally, MD - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion	William Tally, MD - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Excellent	William Tally, MD - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Very Good	William Tally, MD - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Good	William Tally, MD - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Fair	William Tally, MD - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Poor
Reginald Davis, MD - Dynamic Stabilization	Reginald Davis, MD - Dynamic Stabilization Excellent	Reginald Davis, MD - Dynamic Stabilization Very Good	Reginald Davis, MD - Dynamic Stabilization Good	Reginald Davis, MD - Dynamic Stabilization Fair	Reginald Davis, MD - Dynamic Stabilization Poor
- Lumbar Fixation	- Lumbar Fixation Excellent	- Lumbar Fixation Very Good	- Lumbar Fixation Good	- Lumbar Fixation Fair	- Lumbar Fixation Poor
William Tally, MD - Pedicle Screws	William Tally, MD - Pedicle Screws Excellent	William Tally, MD - Pedicle Screws Very Good	William Tally, MD - Pedicle Screws Good	William Tally, MD - Pedicle Screws Fair	William Tally, MD - Pedicle Screws Poor
William Welch, MD - Interspinous	William Welch, MD - Interspinous Excellent	William Welch, MD - Interspinous Very Good	William Welch, MD - Interspinous Good	William Welch, MD - Interspinous Fair	William Welch, MD - Interspinous Poor
Rick Hynes, MD - Cortical	Rick Hynes, MD - Cortical Excellent	Rick Hynes, MD - Cortical Very Good	Rick Hynes, MD - Cortical Good	Rick Hynes, MD - Cortical Fair	Rick Hynes, MD - Cortical Poor
Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Stem Cell; Clinical Outcomes	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Stem Cell; Clinical Outcomes Excellent	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Stem Cell; Clinical Outcomes Very Good	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Stem Cell; Clinical Outcomes Good	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Stem Cell; Clinical Outcomes Fair	Farhan Siddiqi, MD - Stem Cell; Clinical Outcomes Poor

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
Session III: DEFORMITY

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Steven Tresser, MD - Sagittal Balance	Steven Tresser, MD - Sagittal Balance Excellent	Steven Tresser, MD - Sagittal Balance Very Good	Steven Tresser, MD - Sagittal Balance Good	Steven Tresser, MD - Sagittal Balance Fair	Steven Tresser, MD - Sagittal Balance Poor
Robert Isaacs, MD - In MIS Correction; Does Poor Postop Sagittal Alignment Directly Correlate with Poor Function Outcomes of Adult Deformity	Robert Isaacs, MD - In MIS Correction; Does Poor Postop Sagittal Alignment Directly Correlate with Poor Function Outcomes of Adult Deformity Excellent	Robert Isaacs, MD - In MIS Correction; Does Poor Postop Sagittal Alignment Directly Correlate with Poor Function Outcomes of Adult Deformity Very Good	Robert Isaacs, MD - In MIS Correction; Does Poor Postop Sagittal Alignment Directly Correlate with Poor Function Outcomes of Adult Deformity Good	Robert Isaacs, MD - In MIS Correction; Does Poor Postop Sagittal Alignment Directly Correlate with Poor Function Outcomes of Adult Deformity Fair	Robert Isaacs, MD - In MIS Correction; Does Poor Postop Sagittal Alignment Directly Correlate with Poor Function Outcomes of Adult Deformity Poor
James Billys, MD - High Risk Protocol	James Billys, MD - High Risk Protocol Excellent	James Billys, MD - High Risk Protocol Very Good	James Billys, MD - High Risk Protocol Good	James Billys, MD - High Risk Protocol Fair	James Billys, MD - High Risk Protocol Poor
Sheyan Armaghani, MD - How to Handle Pelvic Obliquity with Deformity Surgery	Sheyan Armaghani, MD - How to Handle Pelvic Obliquity with Deformity Surgery Excellent	Sheyan Armaghani, MD - How to Handle Pelvic Obliquity with Deformity Surgery Very Good	Sheyan Armaghani, MD - How to Handle Pelvic Obliquity with Deformity Surgery Good	Sheyan Armaghani, MD - How to Handle Pelvic Obliquity with Deformity Surgery Fair	Sheyan Armaghani, MD - How to Handle Pelvic Obliquity with Deformity Surgery Poor
Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Use of Pelvic Fixation; When & Where	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Use of Pelvic Fixation; When & Where Excellent	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Use of Pelvic Fixation; When & Where Very Good	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Use of Pelvic Fixation; When & Where Good	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Use of Pelvic Fixation; When & Where Fair	Joseph Zavatsky, MD - Use of Pelvic Fixation; When & Where Poor
James Billys, MD - Case Presentation; Point / Counterpoint	James Billys, MD - Case Presentation; Point / Counterpoint Excellent	James Billys, MD - Case Presentation; Point / Counterpoint Very Good	James Billys, MD - Case Presentation; Point / Counterpoint Good	James Billys, MD - Case Presentation; Point / Counterpoint Fair	James Billys, MD - Case Presentation; Point / Counterpoint Poor
Neel Anand, MD - Anterior Column Reconstruction	Neel Anand, MD - Anterior Column Reconstruction Excellent	Neel Anand, MD - Anterior Column Reconstruction Very Good	Neel Anand, MD - Anterior Column Reconstruction Good	Neel Anand, MD - Anterior Column Reconstruction Fair	Neel Anand, MD - Anterior Column Reconstruction Poor
John Small, MD - Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy	John Small, MD - Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Excellent	John Small, MD - Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Very Good	John Small, MD - Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Good	John Small, MD - Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Fair	John Small, MD - Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Poor
Rick Hynes, MD - OLIF	Rick Hynes, MD - OLIF Excellent	Rick Hynes, MD - OLIF Very Good	Rick Hynes, MD - OLIF Good	Rick Hynes, MD - OLIF Fair	Rick Hynes, MD - OLIF Poor

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION IV: CERVICAL

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Jonathan Gottlieb, MD - Navigation	Jonathan Gottlieb, MD - Navigation Excellent	Jonathan Gottlieb, MD - Navigation Very Good	Jonathan Gottlieb, MD - Navigation Good	Jonathan Gottlieb, MD - Navigation Fair	Jonathan Gottlieb, MD - Navigation Poor
William Tally, MD - Cervical Sagital Balance of Hyperlordotic Cervical Cages	William Tally, MD - Cervical Sagital Balance of Hyperlordotic Cervical Cages Excellent	William Tally, MD - Cervical Sagital Balance of Hyperlordotic Cervical Cages Very Good	William Tally, MD - Cervical Sagital Balance of Hyperlordotic Cervical Cages Good	William Tally, MD - Cervical Sagital Balance of Hyperlordotic Cervical Cages Fair	William Tally, MD - Cervical Sagital Balance of Hyperlordotic Cervical Cages Poor
Jack Zigler, MD - Does Cervical Arthroplasty decrease Adjacent Level Degeneration and Reoperation	Jack Zigler, MD - Does Cervical Arthroplasty decrease Adjacent Level Degeneration and Reoperation Excellent	Jack Zigler, MD - Does Cervical Arthroplasty decrease Adjacent Level Degeneration and Reoperation Very Good	Jack Zigler, MD - Does Cervical Arthroplasty decrease Adjacent Level Degeneration and Reoperation Good	Jack Zigler, MD - Does Cervical Arthroplasty decrease Adjacent Level Degeneration and Reoperation Fair	Jack Zigler, MD - Does Cervical Arthroplasty decrease Adjacent Level Degeneration and Reoperation Poor
Jack Zigler, MD - What is the data supporting various surgical treatment options for two level cervical disc disease	Jack Zigler, MD - What is the data supporting various surgical treatment options for two level cervical disc disease Excellent	Jack Zigler, MD - What is the data supporting various surgical treatment options for two level cervical disc disease Very Good	Jack Zigler, MD - What is the data supporting various surgical treatment options for two level cervical disc disease Good	Jack Zigler, MD - What is the data supporting various surgical treatment options for two level cervical disc disease Fair	Jack Zigler, MD - What is the data supporting various surgical treatment options for two level cervical disc disease Poor
Rick Guyer, MD - How Much Kyphosis is Allowable for Cervical Total Disc Replacement	Rick Guyer, MD - How Much Kyphosis is Allowable for Cervical Total Disc Replacement Excellent	Rick Guyer, MD - How Much Kyphosis is Allowable for Cervical Total Disc Replacement Very Good	Rick Guyer, MD - How Much Kyphosis is Allowable for Cervical Total Disc Replacement Good	Rick Guyer, MD - How Much Kyphosis is Allowable for Cervical Total Disc Replacement Fair	Rick Guyer, MD - How Much Kyphosis is Allowable for Cervical Total Disc Replacement Poor
Ira Fedder, MD - Osteoporosis & Deformity Surgery	Ira Fedder, MD - Osteoporosis & Deformity Surgery Excellent	Ira Fedder, MD - Osteoporosis & Deformity Surgery Very Good	Ira Fedder, MD - Osteoporosis & Deformity Surgery Good	Ira Fedder, MD - Osteoporosis & Deformity Surgery Fair	Ira Fedder, MD - Osteoporosis & Deformity Surgery Poor
Chuck Procuniar, PA - Effects of Obesity & Hemoglobin A1C on Deformity Surgery Complications	Chuck Procuniar, PA - Effects of Obesity & Hemoglobin A1C on Deformity Surgery Complications Excellent	Chuck Procuniar, PA - Effects of Obesity & Hemoglobin A1C on Deformity Surgery Complications Very Good	Chuck Procuniar, PA - Effects of Obesity & Hemoglobin A1C on Deformity Surgery Complications Good	Chuck Procuniar, PA - Effects of Obesity & Hemoglobin A1C on Deformity Surgery Complications Fair	Chuck Procuniar, PA - Effects of Obesity & Hemoglobin A1C on Deformity Surgery Complications Poor
Scott Webb, DO - CASE 1 2 level fusion	Scott Webb, DO - CASE 1 2 level fusion Excellent	Scott Webb, DO - CASE 1 2 level fusion Very Good	Scott Webb, DO - CASE 1 2 level fusion Good	Scott Webb, DO - CASE 1 2 level fusion Fair	Scott Webb, DO - CASE 1 2 level fusion Poor
Jack Zigler, MD - Case 2- Hybrid - TDR / The Science behind Hybrid TDR	Jack Zigler, MD - Case 2- Hybrid - TDR / The Science behind Hybrid TDR Excellent	Jack Zigler, MD - Case 2- Hybrid - TDR / The Science behind Hybrid TDR Very Good	Jack Zigler, MD - Case 2- Hybrid - TDR / The Science behind Hybrid TDR Good	Jack Zigler, MD - Case 2- Hybrid - TDR / The Science behind Hybrid TDR Fair	Jack Zigler, MD - Case 2- Hybrid - TDR / The Science behind Hybrid TDR Poor
Devin Datta, MD - OLIF Revision Cases	Devin Datta, MD - OLIF Revision Cases Excellent	Devin Datta, MD - OLIF Revision Cases Very Good	Devin Datta, MD - OLIF Revision Cases Good	Devin Datta, MD - OLIF Revision Cases Fair	Devin Datta, MD - OLIF Revision Cases Poor
Robert Isaacs, MD - Textured PEEK	Robert Isaacs, MD - Textured PEEK Excellent	Robert Isaacs, MD - Textured PEEK Very Good	Robert Isaacs, MD - Textured PEEK Good	Robert Isaacs, MD - Textured PEEK Fair	Robert Isaacs, MD - Textured PEEK Poor

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION VI: SACROILLIAC JOINT

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Boyle Cheng, PhD - What Happens to Sacroiliac Joints After Lumbar Fusion?	Boyle Cheng, PhD - What Happens to Sacroiliac Joints After Lumbar Fusion? Excellent	Boyle Cheng, PhD - What Happens to Sacroiliac Joints After Lumbar Fusion? Very Good	Boyle Cheng, PhD - What Happens to Sacroiliac Joints After Lumbar Fusion? Good	Boyle Cheng, PhD - What Happens to Sacroiliac Joints After Lumbar Fusion? Fair	Boyle Cheng, PhD - What Happens to Sacroiliac Joints After Lumbar Fusion? Poor
Boyle Cheng, PhD - Lumbar Fusion; Single vs. Multiple Level	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Lumbar Fusion; Single vs. Multiple Level Excellent	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Lumbar Fusion; Single vs. Multiple Level Very Good	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Lumbar Fusion; Single vs. Multiple Level Good	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Lumbar Fusion; Single vs. Multiple Level Fair	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Lumbar Fusion; Single vs. Multiple Level Poor
Boyle Cheng, PhD - What Happens to L5-S1 After SI Fusion	Boyle Cheng, PhD - What Happens to L5-S1 After SI Fusion Excellent	Boyle Cheng, PhD - What Happens to L5-S1 After SI Fusion Very Good	Boyle Cheng, PhD - What Happens to L5-S1 After SI Fusion Good	Boyle Cheng, PhD - What Happens to L5-S1 After SI Fusion Fair	Boyle Cheng, PhD - What Happens to L5-S1 After SI Fusion Poor
William Welch, MD - Does Ipsilateral Fusion Lead to Contralateral Increased Stress	William Welch, MD - Does Ipsilateral Fusion Lead to Contralateral Increased Stress Excellent	William Welch, MD - Does Ipsilateral Fusion Lead to Contralateral Increased Stress Very Good	William Welch, MD - Does Ipsilateral Fusion Lead to Contralateral Increased Stress Good	William Welch, MD - Does Ipsilateral Fusion Lead to Contralateral Increased Stress Fair	William Welch, MD - Does Ipsilateral Fusion Lead to Contralateral Increased Stress Poor
James Billys, MD - SI Fusion; Short and Long Term Outcomes	James Billys, MD - SI Fusion; Short and Long Term Outcomes Excellent	James Billys, MD - SI Fusion; Short and Long Term Outcomes Very Good	James Billys, MD - SI Fusion; Short and Long Term Outcomes Good	James Billys, MD - SI Fusion; Short and Long Term Outcomes Fair	James Billys, MD - SI Fusion; Short and Long Term Outcomes Poor

Question Title

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION VII: POSTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Boyle Cheng, PhD - Back to the Future	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Back to the Future Excellent	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Back to the Future Very Good	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Back to the Future Good	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Back to the Future Fair	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Back to the Future Poor
Don Moore, MD - Interspinous Distraction Device	Don Moore, MD - Interspinous Distraction Device Excellent	Don Moore, MD - Interspinous Distraction Device Very Good	Don Moore, MD - Interspinous Distraction Device Good	Don Moore, MD - Interspinous Distraction Device Fair	Don Moore, MD - Interspinous Distraction Device Poor
Reginald Davis, MD - Dynamic Interspinous Process	Reginald Davis, MD - Dynamic Interspinous Process Excellent	Reginald Davis, MD - Dynamic Interspinous Process Very Good	Reginald Davis, MD - Dynamic Interspinous Process Good	Reginald Davis, MD - Dynamic Interspinous Process Fair	Reginald Davis, MD - Dynamic Interspinous Process Poor
Scott Webb, DO - Interspinous Plating	Scott Webb, DO - Interspinous Plating Excellent	Scott Webb, DO - Interspinous Plating Very Good	Scott Webb, DO - Interspinous Plating Good	Scott Webb, DO - Interspinous Plating Fair	Scott Webb, DO - Interspinous Plating Poor
Lloydine Jacobs, MD - Interspinous Fixation Implants	Lloydine Jacobs, MD - Interspinous Fixation Implants Excellent	Lloydine Jacobs, MD - Interspinous Fixation Implants Very Good	Lloydine Jacobs, MD - Interspinous Fixation Implants Good	Lloydine Jacobs, MD - Interspinous Fixation Implants Fair	Lloydine Jacobs, MD - Interspinous Fixation Implants Poor

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Atlanta Trauma Symposium speakers
SESSION VIII: FACTORS INFLUEINCING THE BONE-IMPLANT INTERFACE

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Composite PEEK Materials	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Composite PEEK Materials Excellent	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Composite PEEK Materials Very Good	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Composite PEEK Materials Good	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Composite PEEK Materials Fair	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Composite PEEK Materials Poor
Lisa Ferrara, PhD - PEEK-TI Devices	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - PEEK-TI Devices Excellent	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - PEEK-TI Devices Very Good	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - PEEK-TI Devices Good	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - PEEK-TI Devices Fair	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - PEEK-TI Devices Poor
Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Additive Manufactured Devices	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Additive Manufactured Devices Excellent	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Additive Manufactured Devices Very Good	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Additive Manufactured Devices Good	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Additive Manufactured Devices Fair	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Additive Manufactured Devices Poor
Ira Fedder, MD - PEEK w/ Stem Cell	Ira Fedder, MD - PEEK w/ Stem Cell Excellent	Ira Fedder, MD - PEEK w/ Stem Cell Very Good	Ira Fedder, MD - PEEK w/ Stem Cell Good	Ira Fedder, MD - PEEK w/ Stem Cell Fair	Ira Fedder, MD - PEEK w/ Stem Cell Poor
Boyle Cheng, PhD - Femto-Surface Treatments	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Femto-Surface Treatments Excellent	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Femto-Surface Treatments Very Good	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Femto-Surface Treatments Good	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Femto-Surface Treatments Fair	Boyle Cheng, PhD - Femto-Surface Treatments Poor
William Welch, MD - In Defense of PEEK	William Welch, MD - In Defense of PEEK Excellent	William Welch, MD - In Defense of PEEK Very Good	William Welch, MD - In Defense of PEEK Good	William Welch, MD - In Defense of PEEK Fair	William Welch, MD - In Defense of PEEK Poor
Robert Spiro, MD - Titanium on PEEK Interbody Implants	Robert Spiro, MD - Titanium on PEEK Interbody Implants Excellent	Robert Spiro, MD - Titanium on PEEK Interbody Implants Very Good	Robert Spiro, MD - Titanium on PEEK Interbody Implants Good	Robert Spiro, MD - Titanium on PEEK Interbody Implants Fair	Robert Spiro, MD - Titanium on PEEK Interbody Implants Poor

Question Title

* 17. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 18. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 19. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 20. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Direct Mail

Eblast

Phone Call

Course Catalog

Orthopedics Today/Orthopedics Ad

Social Media (Facebook/Twitter)

Referral (Please list below)

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 21. Please provide your contact information.

Full Name:

Degree:

Email Address:

Phone Number:

Question Title

* 22. The Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education (FORE) is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians. FORE designates this live activity for a maximum of 17 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits^TM. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

For the purpose of recertification, the following organizations accept AMA PRA Category 1 Credits^TMfrom organizations accredited by the ACCME.

American Academy of Physician Assistants (AAPA)

American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC)

American Academy of Neurosurgeons (AANS)

Please attest to the total number of credit hours (minimum .25- maximum 17) that you spent in this CME activity:

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest. Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support? (One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Question Title

* 6. How well were the Castellvi Spine course objectives met?Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakersSESSION I: HIGH TECH IMAGING; NAVIGATION AND ROBOTICS OUR NEW FUTURE

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakersSESSION II: LUMBAR

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers Session III: DEFORMITY

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakersSESSION IV: CERVICAL

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakersSESSION VI: SACROILLIAC JOINT

Question Title

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakersSESSION VII: POSTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Atlanta Trauma Symposium speakersSESSION VIII: FACTORS INFLUEINCING THE BONE-IMPLANT INTERFACE

Question Title

* 17. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 18. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 19. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 20. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Question Title

* 21. Please provide your contact information.

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

* 6. How well were the Castellvi Spine course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION I: HIGH TECH IMAGING; NAVIGATION AND ROBOTICS OUR NEW FUTURE

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION II: LUMBAR

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
Session III: DEFORMITY

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION IV: CERVICAL

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION VI: SACROILLIAC JOINT

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION VII: POSTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Atlanta Trauma Symposium speakers
SESSION VIII: FACTORS INFLUEINCING THE BONE-IMPLANT INTERFACE