HD 315

Question Title

* Current population objectives are expressed as a desired number of elk counted, and typically include a range around that value (+/-20%). The range accounts for anticipated variability in elk counts among years. In this HD, should FWP maintain the current form of objective (point value with fixed range) or should FWP consider alternative population objective forms, like using the long-term average (5 years, 10 years) +/- 20%, or some other approach to establish a population objective?

Question Title

* Elk populations are classified into objective status using annual or biennial survey data.  Because there is often variation among surveys, would it be more appropriate to use individual surveys or a 3-year average of surveys to determine objective status for this HD or would you recommend some other approach?

Question Title

Image

Question Title

* The current population objective for HD 315 is 1,000 (range 800-1,200). Do you think the current population objective level should be maintained, increased, or decreased? If increased or decreased, what should the new range be?

Question Title

* In HD 315, there is a bull objective to observe 80 bulls during post-season aerial surveys. Should there be a bull objective in this HD? If so, is the current bull objective appropriate? If not, what should it be?

Question Title

* Are you satisfied with the current elk distribution in this HD? If not, would you suggest any specific objectives to address the distribution?

Question Title

* What else does the Elk Management Plan need to include for this HD?

T