2025 AFCC Fall Virtual Conference Evaluation
Opening Session

Opening Session: From Forced to Invited: Trauma-Informed Accountability in Complex Parenting Plan Disputes

This workshop introduces a trauma-informed approach to promoting accountability in complex Parent-Child Contact Problems (PCCP). Learn how forced accountability strategies can activate resistance and how reframing accountability as an invitation to change can foster engagement and sustainable outcomes. Practical techniques for activating strengths, creating psychological safety, and addressing trauma driven behaviors will be demonstrated. Case examples involving PCCP will illustrate applications. This session offers creative interventions for supporting overwhelmed family court systems.

Question Title

* 1. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the conference brochure

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Question Title

* 2. Based on the content of this session, I am able to: (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree)

	1	2	3	4	5
1. Describe how traditional accountability approaches can activate trauma responses and increase resistance in complex parenting disputes.	1. Describe how traditional accountability approaches can activate trauma responses and increase resistance in complex parenting disputes. 1	1. Describe how traditional accountability approaches can activate trauma responses and increase resistance in complex parenting disputes. 2	1. Describe how traditional accountability approaches can activate trauma responses and increase resistance in complex parenting disputes. 3	1. Describe how traditional accountability approaches can activate trauma responses and increase resistance in complex parenting disputes. 4	1. Describe how traditional accountability approaches can activate trauma responses and increase resistance in complex parenting disputes. 5
2. Implement specific trauma-informed accountability techniques that promote engagement while avoiding shame and blame.	2. Implement specific trauma-informed accountability techniques that promote engagement while avoiding shame and blame. 1	2. Implement specific trauma-informed accountability techniques that promote engagement while avoiding shame and blame. 2	2. Implement specific trauma-informed accountability techniques that promote engagement while avoiding shame and blame. 3	2. Implement specific trauma-informed accountability techniques that promote engagement while avoiding shame and blame. 4	2. Implement specific trauma-informed accountability techniques that promote engagement while avoiding shame and blame. 5
3. Identify how unresolved trauma influences parental capacity for accountability and develop appropriate intervention sequencing.	3. Identify how unresolved trauma influences parental capacity for accountability and develop appropriate intervention sequencing. 1	3. Identify how unresolved trauma influences parental capacity for accountability and develop appropriate intervention sequencing. 2	3. Identify how unresolved trauma influences parental capacity for accountability and develop appropriate intervention sequencing. 3	3. Identify how unresolved trauma influences parental capacity for accountability and develop appropriate intervention sequencing. 4	3. Identify how unresolved trauma influences parental capacity for accountability and develop appropriate intervention sequencing. 5

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Michael A. Saini, PhD, MSW, RSW (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 4. Please rate presenter: Leslie M. Drozd, PhD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 5. Please rate presenter: Jennifer Harrison, PsyD, ABPP (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

2025 AFCC Fall Virtual Conference Evaluation
Opening Session

Question Title

* 1. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the conference brochure

Question Title

* 2. Based on the content of this session, I am able to: (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree)

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Michael A. Saini, PhD, MSW, RSW (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 4. Please rate presenter: Leslie M. Drozd, PhD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 5. Please rate presenter: Jennifer Harrison, PsyD, ABPP (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 6. Please rate this session presentation overall (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 7. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? (1=Very little, 5=Great deal)

Question Title

* 8. Information presented in this session reflected the most current evidence on this topic (1=Disagree, 5=Agree)

Question Title

* 9. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development (1=Not useful, 5=Extremely useful)

Question Title

* 10. Additional Comments