2025 AFCC Fall Virtual Conference Evaluation
Institute 2

Institute 2: Parenting is a Job; Post-Separation Parenting is a Job Share: A Tool for Parenting Plan Evaluators

A unique framework and method will be provided for evaluating parenting behaviors and skill. The framework views parenting as a job and post-separation parenting as a job-share. Both the parenting job description and the coparenting job-share description will be presented. Four elements common to best interest of the child standards found in various jurisdictions will also be discussed. This institute also explores the impact of parental animus and hostility on children as an intolerable conflict, and the impact children can have on the shared parenting relationship. The job description is defined along with the statutory, regulatory, ethical, and best practice foundations. Types of bias and logical fallacies are presented. This institute is appropriate for both new and experienced parenting plan evaluators (PPEs) seeking new information and a fresh perspective.

Question Title

* 1. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the conference brochure

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Question Title

* 2. Based on the content of this session, I am able to: (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree)

	1	2	3	4	5
1. Explain the parenting job description, and job-share parenting professional standards	1. Explain the parenting job description, and job-share parenting professional standards 1	1. Explain the parenting job description, and job-share parenting professional standards 2	1. Explain the parenting job description, and job-share parenting professional standards 3	1. Explain the parenting job description, and job-share parenting professional standards 4	1. Explain the parenting job description, and job-share parenting professional standards 5
2. Apply the parenting job description and job-share parenting professional standards to evaluating parenting behaviors.	2. Apply the parenting job description and job-share parenting professional standards to evaluating parenting behaviors. 1	2. Apply the parenting job description and job-share parenting professional standards to evaluating parenting behaviors. 2	2. Apply the parenting job description and job-share parenting professional standards to evaluating parenting behaviors. 3	2. Apply the parenting job description and job-share parenting professional standards to evaluating parenting behaviors. 4	2. Apply the parenting job description and job-share parenting professional standards to evaluating parenting behaviors. 5
3. Identify four areas of mutual interest and responsibility of job-share parenting in evaluating parenting behaviors.	3. Identify four areas of mutual interest and responsibility of job-share parenting in evaluating parenting behaviors. 1	3. Identify four areas of mutual interest and responsibility of job-share parenting in evaluating parenting behaviors. 2	3. Identify four areas of mutual interest and responsibility of job-share parenting in evaluating parenting behaviors. 3	3. Identify four areas of mutual interest and responsibility of job-share parenting in evaluating parenting behaviors. 4	3. Identify four areas of mutual interest and responsibility of job-share parenting in evaluating parenting behaviors. 5
4. Discuss the implementation of the areas of mutual interest and responsibility in job-share parenting	4. Discuss the implementation of the areas of mutual interest and responsibility in job-share parenting 1	4. Discuss the implementation of the areas of mutual interest and responsibility in job-share parenting 2	4. Discuss the implementation of the areas of mutual interest and responsibility in job-share parenting 3	4. Discuss the implementation of the areas of mutual interest and responsibility in job-share parenting 4	4. Discuss the implementation of the areas of mutual interest and responsibility in job-share parenting 5

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Allen L. Levy, MS (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

Question Title

* 4. Please rate presenter: Jaime Browning, LCSW (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
Level of knowledge and expertise	Level of knowledge and expertise 1	Level of knowledge and expertise 2	Level of knowledge and expertise 3	Level of knowledge and expertise 4	Level of knowledge and expertise 5
Teaching ability	Teaching ability 1	Teaching ability 2	Teaching ability 3	Teaching ability 4	Teaching ability 5
Maintained my interest	Maintained my interest 1	Maintained my interest 2	Maintained my interest 3	Maintained my interest 4	Maintained my interest 5
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5

2025 AFCC Fall Virtual Conference Evaluation
Institute 2

Question Title

* 1. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the conference brochure

Question Title

* 2. Based on the content of this session, I am able to: (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree)

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Allen L. Levy, MS (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 4. Please rate presenter: Jaime Browning, LCSW (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 5. Please rate this session presentation overall (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 6. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? (1=Very little, 5=Great deal)

Question Title

* 7. Information presented in this session reflected the most current evidence on this topic (1=Disagree, 5=Agree)

Question Title

* 8. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development (1=Not useful, 5=Extremely useful)

Question Title

* 9. Additional Comments