Cardiology for the Practitioner - May 2, 2020 Speaker Evaluation Question Title * 1. Please provide FIRST and LAST Name: Question Title * 2. Please provide your Email Address: Question Title * 3. Physician: Yes No Other Health Care Professional (please specify) Question Title * 4. Type of Practice: Full-time Part-time Solo Group Question Title * 5. Practice Location: Office Hospital Both SESSION I: Risk Factor Control Question Title * 6. Speaker: Beth Abramson, MDTopic: Guidelines for lipid lowering: Canadian eh? 1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 1 = Strongly Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 2 = Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 3 = Neutral Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 4 = Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 5 = Strongly Agree Was consistent with stated objectives Was consistent with stated objectives 1 = Strongly Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 2 = Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 3 = Neutral Was consistent with stated objectives 4 = Agree Was consistent with stated objectives 5 = Strongly Agree Information was presented clearly Information was presented clearly 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was presented clearly 2 = Disagree Information was presented clearly 3 = Neutral Information was presented clearly 4 = Agree Information was presented clearly 5 = Strongly Agree Information was relevant to practice Information was relevant to practice 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was relevant to practice 2 = Disagree Information was relevant to practice 3 = Neutral Information was relevant to practice 4 = Agree Information was relevant to practice 5 = Strongly Agree Discussion time was adequate Discussion time was adequate 1 = Strongly Disagree Discussion time was adequate 2 = Disagree Discussion time was adequate 3 = Neutral Discussion time was adequate 4 = Agree Discussion time was adequate 5 = Strongly Agree Question Title * 7. Speaker: Ronald Goldenberg, MDTopic: Controversies in dyslipidemia management 1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 1 = Strongly Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 2 = Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 3 = Neutral Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 4 = Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 5 = Strongly Agree Was consistent with stated objectives Was consistent with stated objectives 1 = Strongly Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 2 = Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 3 = Neutral Was consistent with stated objectives 4 = Agree Was consistent with stated objectives 5 = Strongly Agree Information was presented clearly Information was presented clearly 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was presented clearly 2 = Disagree Information was presented clearly 3 = Neutral Information was presented clearly 4 = Agree Information was presented clearly 5 = Strongly Agree Information was relevant to practice Information was relevant to practice 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was relevant to practice 2 = Disagree Information was relevant to practice 3 = Neutral Information was relevant to practice 4 = Agree Information was relevant to practice 5 = Strongly Agree Discussion time was adequate Discussion time was adequate 1 = Strongly Disagree Discussion time was adequate 2 = Disagree Discussion time was adequate 3 = Neutral Discussion time was adequate 4 = Agree Discussion time was adequate 5 = Strongly Agree Question Title * 8. Speaker: Kim Connelly, MDTopic: Diabetes management: focusing on CV outcomes 1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 1 = Strongly Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 2 = Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 3 = Neutral Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 4 = Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 5 = Strongly Agree Was consistent with stated objectives Was consistent with stated objectives 1 = Strongly Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 2 = Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 3 = Neutral Was consistent with stated objectives 4 = Agree Was consistent with stated objectives 5 = Strongly Agree Information was presented clearly Information was presented clearly 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was presented clearly 2 = Disagree Information was presented clearly 3 = Neutral Information was presented clearly 4 = Agree Information was presented clearly 5 = Strongly Agree Information was relevant to practice Information was relevant to practice 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was relevant to practice 2 = Disagree Information was relevant to practice 3 = Neutral Information was relevant to practice 4 = Agree Information was relevant to practice 5 = Strongly Agree Discussion time was adequate Discussion time was adequate 1 = Strongly Disagree Discussion time was adequate 2 = Disagree Discussion time was adequate 3 = Neutral Discussion time was adequate 4 = Agree Discussion time was adequate 5 = Strongly Agree Question Title * 9. Speaker: Gordon Moe, MDTopic: Management of HFrEF: the old and the new 1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 1 = Strongly Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 2 = Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 3 = Neutral Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 4 = Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 5 = Strongly Agree Was consistent with stated objectives Was consistent with stated objectives 1 = Strongly Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 2 = Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 3 = Neutral Was consistent with stated objectives 4 = Agree Was consistent with stated objectives 5 = Strongly Agree Information was presented clearly Information was presented clearly 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was presented clearly 2 = Disagree Information was presented clearly 3 = Neutral Information was presented clearly 4 = Agree Information was presented clearly 5 = Strongly Agree Information was relevant to practice Information was relevant to practice 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was relevant to practice 2 = Disagree Information was relevant to practice 3 = Neutral Information was relevant to practice 4 = Agree Information was relevant to practice 5 = Strongly Agree Discussion time was adequate Discussion time was adequate 1 = Strongly Disagree Discussion time was adequate 2 = Disagree Discussion time was adequate 3 = Neutral Discussion time was adequate 4 = Agree Discussion time was adequate 5 = Strongly Agree Question Title * 10. Speaker: FacultyTopic: Panel Discussion and Q & A with Interactive Audience Participation 1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 1 = Strongly Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 2 = Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 3 = Neutral Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 4 = Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 5 = Strongly Agree Was consistent with stated objectives Was consistent with stated objectives 1 = Strongly Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 2 = Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 3 = Neutral Was consistent with stated objectives 4 = Agree Was consistent with stated objectives 5 = Strongly Agree Information was presented clearly Information was presented clearly 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was presented clearly 2 = Disagree Information was presented clearly 3 = Neutral Information was presented clearly 4 = Agree Information was presented clearly 5 = Strongly Agree Information was relevant to practice Information was relevant to practice 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was relevant to practice 2 = Disagree Information was relevant to practice 3 = Neutral Information was relevant to practice 4 = Agree Information was relevant to practice 5 = Strongly Agree Discussion time was adequate Discussion time was adequate 1 = Strongly Disagree Discussion time was adequate 2 = Disagree Discussion time was adequate 3 = Neutral Discussion time was adequate 4 = Agree Discussion time was adequate 5 = Strongly Agree SESSION II: Updates in Common Cardiovascular Problems Question Title * 11. Speaker: John Graham, MDTopic: Antithrombotic therapy in primary and secondary prevention 1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 1 = Strongly Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 2 = Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 3 = Neutral Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 4 = Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 5 = Strongly Agree Was consistent with stated objectives Was consistent with stated objectives 1 = Strongly Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 2 = Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 3 = Neutral Was consistent with stated objectives 4 = Agree Was consistent with stated objectives 5 = Strongly Agree Information was presented clearly Information was presented clearly 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was presented clearly 2 = Disagree Information was presented clearly 3 = Neutral Information was presented clearly 4 = Agree Information was presented clearly 5 = Strongly Agree Information was relevant to practice Information was relevant to practice 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was relevant to practice 2 = Disagree Information was relevant to practice 3 = Neutral Information was relevant to practice 4 = Agree Information was relevant to practice 5 = Strongly Agree Discussion time was adequate Discussion time was adequate 1 = Strongly Disagree Discussion time was adequate 2 = Disagree Discussion time was adequate 3 = Neutral Discussion time was adequate 4 = Agree Discussion time was adequate 5 = Strongly Agree Question Title * 12. Speaker: David Fitchett, MDTopic: The changing landscape of secondary prevention 1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 1 = Strongly Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 2 = Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 3 = Neutral Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 4 = Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 5 = Strongly Agree Was consistent with stated objectives Was consistent with stated objectives 1 = Strongly Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 2 = Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 3 = Neutral Was consistent with stated objectives 4 = Agree Was consistent with stated objectives 5 = Strongly Agree Information was presented clearly Information was presented clearly 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was presented clearly 2 = Disagree Information was presented clearly 3 = Neutral Information was presented clearly 4 = Agree Information was presented clearly 5 = Strongly Agree Information was relevant to practice Information was relevant to practice 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was relevant to practice 2 = Disagree Information was relevant to practice 3 = Neutral Information was relevant to practice 4 = Agree Information was relevant to practice 5 = Strongly Agree Discussion time was adequate Discussion time was adequate 1 = Strongly Disagree Discussion time was adequate 2 = Disagree Discussion time was adequate 3 = Neutral Discussion time was adequate 4 = Agree Discussion time was adequate 5 = Strongly Agree Question Title * 13. Speaker: Shaun Goodman, MDTopic: Best approach in patient with ISCHEMIA 1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 1 = Strongly Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 2 = Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 3 = Neutral Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 4 = Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 5 = Strongly Agree Was consistent with stated objectives Was consistent with stated objectives 1 = Strongly Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 2 = Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 3 = Neutral Was consistent with stated objectives 4 = Agree Was consistent with stated objectives 5 = Strongly Agree Information was presented clearly Information was presented clearly 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was presented clearly 2 = Disagree Information was presented clearly 3 = Neutral Information was presented clearly 4 = Agree Information was presented clearly 5 = Strongly Agree Information was relevant to practice Information was relevant to practice 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was relevant to practice 2 = Disagree Information was relevant to practice 3 = Neutral Information was relevant to practice 4 = Agree Information was relevant to practice 5 = Strongly Agree Discussion time was adequate Discussion time was adequate 1 = Strongly Disagree Discussion time was adequate 2 = Disagree Discussion time was adequate 3 = Neutral Discussion time was adequate 4 = Agree Discussion time was adequate 5 = Strongly Agree Question Title * 14. Speaker: Akshay Bagai, MDTopic: CAD + AF: Difficult decisions when two diseases co-exist 1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 1 = Strongly Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 2 = Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 3 = Neutral Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 4 = Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 5 = Strongly Agree Was consistent with stated objectives Was consistent with stated objectives 1 = Strongly Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 2 = Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 3 = Neutral Was consistent with stated objectives 4 = Agree Was consistent with stated objectives 5 = Strongly Agree Information was presented clearly Information was presented clearly 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was presented clearly 2 = Disagree Information was presented clearly 3 = Neutral Information was presented clearly 4 = Agree Information was presented clearly 5 = Strongly Agree Information was relevant to practice Information was relevant to practice 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was relevant to practice 2 = Disagree Information was relevant to practice 3 = Neutral Information was relevant to practice 4 = Agree Information was relevant to practice 5 = Strongly Agree Discussion time was adequate Discussion time was adequate 1 = Strongly Disagree Discussion time was adequate 2 = Disagree Discussion time was adequate 3 = Neutral Discussion time was adequate 4 = Agree Discussion time was adequate 5 = Strongly Agree Question Title * 15. Speaker: FacultyTopic: Panel Discussion and Q & A with Interactive Audience Participation 1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 1 = Strongly Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 2 = Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 3 = Neutral Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 4 = Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 5 = Strongly Agree Was consistent with stated objectives Was consistent with stated objectives 1 = Strongly Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 2 = Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 3 = Neutral Was consistent with stated objectives 4 = Agree Was consistent with stated objectives 5 = Strongly Agree Information was presented clearly Information was presented clearly 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was presented clearly 2 = Disagree Information was presented clearly 3 = Neutral Information was presented clearly 4 = Agree Information was presented clearly 5 = Strongly Agree Information was relevant to practice Information was relevant to practice 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was relevant to practice 2 = Disagree Information was relevant to practice 3 = Neutral Information was relevant to practice 4 = Agree Information was relevant to practice 5 = Strongly Agree Discussion time was adequate Discussion time was adequate 1 = Strongly Disagree Discussion time was adequate 2 = Disagree Discussion time was adequate 3 = Neutral Discussion time was adequate 4 = Agree Discussion time was adequate 5 = Strongly Agree SESSION III: Innovations and New Approaches for your patients Question Title * 16. Speaker: Kamran Ahmad, MDTopic: Looking for AF in all the right places 1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 1 = Strongly Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 2 = Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 3 = Neutral Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 4 = Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 5 = Strongly Agree Was consistent with stated objectives Was consistent with stated objectives 1 = Strongly Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 2 = Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 3 = Neutral Was consistent with stated objectives 4 = Agree Was consistent with stated objectives 5 = Strongly Agree Information was presented clearly Information was presented clearly 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was presented clearly 2 = Disagree Information was presented clearly 3 = Neutral Information was presented clearly 4 = Agree Information was presented clearly 5 = Strongly Agree Information was relevant to practice Information was relevant to practice 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was relevant to practice 2 = Disagree Information was relevant to practice 3 = Neutral Information was relevant to practice 4 = Agree Information was relevant to practice 5 = Strongly Agree Discussion time was adequate Discussion time was adequate 1 = Strongly Disagree Discussion time was adequate 2 = Disagree Discussion time was adequate 3 = Neutral Discussion time was adequate 4 = Agree Discussion time was adequate 5 = Strongly Agree Question Title * 17. Speaker: Andrew Yan, MDTopic: : New clinical trials that impact on your practice 1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 1 = Strongly Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 2 = Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 3 = Neutral Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 4 = Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 5 = Strongly Agree Was consistent with stated objectives Was consistent with stated objectives 1 = Strongly Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 2 = Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 3 = Neutral Was consistent with stated objectives 4 = Agree Was consistent with stated objectives 5 = Strongly Agree Information was presented clearly Information was presented clearly 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was presented clearly 2 = Disagree Information was presented clearly 3 = Neutral Information was presented clearly 4 = Agree Information was presented clearly 5 = Strongly Agree Information was relevant to practice Information was relevant to practice 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was relevant to practice 2 = Disagree Information was relevant to practice 3 = Neutral Information was relevant to practice 4 = Agree Information was relevant to practice 5 = Strongly Agree Discussion time was adequate Discussion time was adequate 1 = Strongly Disagree Discussion time was adequate 2 = Disagree Discussion time was adequate 3 = Neutral Discussion time was adequate 4 = Agree Discussion time was adequate 5 = Strongly Agree Question Title * 18. Speaker: Anatoly Langer, MDTopic: When the art of medicine is in the way of practice of medicine 1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 1 = Strongly Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 2 = Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 3 = Neutral Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 4 = Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 5 = Strongly Agree Was consistent with stated objectives Was consistent with stated objectives 1 = Strongly Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 2 = Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 3 = Neutral Was consistent with stated objectives 4 = Agree Was consistent with stated objectives 5 = Strongly Agree Information was presented clearly Information was presented clearly 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was presented clearly 2 = Disagree Information was presented clearly 3 = Neutral Information was presented clearly 4 = Agree Information was presented clearly 5 = Strongly Agree Information was relevant to practice Information was relevant to practice 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was relevant to practice 2 = Disagree Information was relevant to practice 3 = Neutral Information was relevant to practice 4 = Agree Information was relevant to practice 5 = Strongly Agree Discussion time was adequate Discussion time was adequate 1 = Strongly Disagree Discussion time was adequate 2 = Disagree Discussion time was adequate 3 = Neutral Discussion time was adequate 4 = Agree Discussion time was adequate 5 = Strongly Agree Question Title * 19. Speaker: Yin Ge, MDTopic: Show and tell: clinical vignettes (primary PCI, PCI vs CABG, TAVI) 1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 1 = Strongly Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 2 = Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 3 = Neutral Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 4 = Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 5 = Strongly Agree Was consistent with stated objectives Was consistent with stated objectives 1 = Strongly Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 2 = Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 3 = Neutral Was consistent with stated objectives 4 = Agree Was consistent with stated objectives 5 = Strongly Agree Information was presented clearly Information was presented clearly 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was presented clearly 2 = Disagree Information was presented clearly 3 = Neutral Information was presented clearly 4 = Agree Information was presented clearly 5 = Strongly Agree Information was relevant to practice Information was relevant to practice 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was relevant to practice 2 = Disagree Information was relevant to practice 3 = Neutral Information was relevant to practice 4 = Agree Information was relevant to practice 5 = Strongly Agree Discussion time was adequate Discussion time was adequate 1 = Strongly Disagree Discussion time was adequate 2 = Disagree Discussion time was adequate 3 = Neutral Discussion time was adequate 4 = Agree Discussion time was adequate 5 = Strongly Agree Question Title * 20. Speaker: FacultyTopic: Panel Discussion and Q & A with Interactive Audience Participation 1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 1 = Strongly Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 2 = Disagree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 3 = Neutral Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 4 = Agree Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased 5 = Strongly Agree Was consistent with stated objectives Was consistent with stated objectives 1 = Strongly Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 2 = Disagree Was consistent with stated objectives 3 = Neutral Was consistent with stated objectives 4 = Agree Was consistent with stated objectives 5 = Strongly Agree Information was presented clearly Information was presented clearly 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was presented clearly 2 = Disagree Information was presented clearly 3 = Neutral Information was presented clearly 4 = Agree Information was presented clearly 5 = Strongly Agree Information was relevant to practice Information was relevant to practice 1 = Strongly Disagree Information was relevant to practice 2 = Disagree Information was relevant to practice 3 = Neutral Information was relevant to practice 4 = Agree Information was relevant to practice 5 = Strongly Agree Discussion time was adequate Discussion time was adequate 1 = Strongly Disagree Discussion time was adequate 2 = Disagree Discussion time was adequate 3 = Neutral Discussion time was adequate 4 = Agree Discussion time was adequate 5 = Strongly Agree Question Title * 21. Comments: Next
