Speaker Evaluation

Question Title

* 1. Please provide FIRST and LAST Name:

Question Title

* 2. Please provide your Email Address:

Question Title

* 3. Physician:

Question Title

* 4. Type of Practice:

Question Title

* 5. Practice Location:

SESSION I: Risk Factor Control

Question Title

* 6. Speaker: Beth Abramson, MD
Topic: Guidelines for lipid lowering: Canadian eh?

  1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased
Was consistent with stated objectives
Information was presented clearly
Information was relevant to practice
Discussion time was adequate

Question Title

* 7. Speaker: Ronald Goldenberg, MD
Topic: Controversies in dyslipidemia management

  1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased
Was consistent with stated objectives
Information was presented clearly
Information was relevant to practice
Discussion time was adequate

Question Title

* 8. Speaker: Kim Connelly, MD
Topic: Diabetes management: focusing on CV outcomes

  1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased
Was consistent with stated objectives
Information was presented clearly
Information was relevant to practice
Discussion time was adequate

Question Title

* 9. Speaker: Gordon Moe, MD
Topic: Management of HFrEF: the old and the new

  1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased
Was consistent with stated objectives
Information was presented clearly
Information was relevant to practice
Discussion time was adequate

Question Title

* 10. Speaker: Faculty
Topic: Panel Discussion and Q & A with Interactive Audience Participation

  1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased
Was consistent with stated objectives
Information was presented clearly
Information was relevant to practice
Discussion time was adequate
SESSION II: Updates in Common Cardiovascular Problems

Question Title

* 11. Speaker: John Graham, MD
Topic: Antithrombotic therapy in primary and secondary prevention

  1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased
Was consistent with stated objectives
Information was presented clearly
Information was relevant to practice
Discussion time was adequate

Question Title

* 12. Speaker: David Fitchett, MD
Topic: The changing landscape of secondary prevention

  1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased
Was consistent with stated objectives
Information was presented clearly
Information was relevant to practice
Discussion time was adequate

Question Title

* 13. Speaker: Shaun Goodman, MD
Topic: Best approach in patient with ISCHEMIA

  1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased
Was consistent with stated objectives
Information was presented clearly
Information was relevant to practice
Discussion time was adequate

Question Title

* 14. Speaker: Akshay Bagai, MD
Topic: CAD + AF: Difficult decisions when two diseases co-exist

  1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased
Was consistent with stated objectives
Information was presented clearly
Information was relevant to practice
Discussion time was adequate

Question Title

* 15. Speaker: Faculty
Topic: Panel Discussion and Q & A with Interactive Audience Participation

  1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased
Was consistent with stated objectives
Information was presented clearly
Information was relevant to practice
Discussion time was adequate
SESSION III: Innovations and New Approaches for your patients

Question Title

* 16. Speaker: Kamran Ahmad, MD
Topic: Looking for AF in all the right places

  1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased
Was consistent with stated objectives
Information was presented clearly
Information was relevant to practice
Discussion time was adequate

Question Title

* 17. Speaker: Andrew Yan, MD
Topic: : New clinical trials that impact on your practice

  1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased
Was consistent with stated objectives
Information was presented clearly
Information was relevant to practice
Discussion time was adequate

Question Title

* 18. Speaker: Anatoly Langer, MD
Topic: When the art of medicine is in the way of practice of medicine

  1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased
Was consistent with stated objectives
Information was presented clearly
Information was relevant to practice
Discussion time was adequate

Question Title

* 19. Speaker: Yin Ge, MD
Topic: Show and tell: clinical vignettes (primary PCI, PCI vs CABG, TAVI)

  1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased
Was consistent with stated objectives
Information was presented clearly
Information was relevant to practice
Discussion time was adequate

Question Title

* 20. Speaker: Faculty
Topic: Panel Discussion and Q & A with Interactive Audience Participation

  1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Speaker / Presentation was Balanced & Unbiased
Was consistent with stated objectives
Information was presented clearly
Information was relevant to practice
Discussion time was adequate

Question Title

* 21. Comments:

T