IoT Brand Survey -2024 Question Title * 1. What is your job title? VP/C Level Manager Director Head Consultant Engineer Procurement Other (please specify) Question Title * 2. When you think of antennas or wireless connectivity solutions for IoT, which brands come to mind? (check all that apply) TE Connectivity Molex Taoglas Linx Technologies Laird Connectivity Other (please specify) Question Title * 3. Are you aware that Laird Connectivity’s external antennas business and Linx Technologies are now part of TE Connectivity? Yes No Only aware that Laird Connectivity’s external antennas business is now part of TE Connectivity Only aware that Linx Technologies is now part of TE Connectivity Question Title * 4. On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate the Laird External Antennas, Linx Technologies and TE Connectivity brand? 1 (Unfavorable) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (favorable) Laird External Antennas Laird External Antennas 1 (Unfavorable) Laird External Antennas 2 Laird External Antennas 3 Laird External Antennas 4 Laird External Antennas 5 Laird External Antennas 6 Laird External Antennas 7 Laird External Antennas 8 Laird External Antennas 9 Laird External Antennas 10 (favorable) Linx Technologies Linx Technologies 1 (Unfavorable) Linx Technologies 2 Linx Technologies 3 Linx Technologies 4 Linx Technologies 5 Linx Technologies 6 Linx Technologies 7 Linx Technologies 8 Linx Technologies 9 Linx Technologies 10 (favorable) TE Connectivity TE Connectivity 1 (Unfavorable) TE Connectivity 2 TE Connectivity 3 TE Connectivity 4 TE Connectivity 5 TE Connectivity 6 TE Connectivity 7 TE Connectivity 8 TE Connectivity 9 TE Connectivity 10 (favorable) Question Title * 5. Which of the following statements do you associate with the brands below, if any? (check all that apply) Good value Innovative Easy to do business with Good customer experience Poor product quality Broad product portfolio Expensive Laird Connectivity Laird Connectivity Good value Laird Connectivity Innovative Laird Connectivity Easy to do business with Laird Connectivity Good customer experience Laird Connectivity Poor product quality Laird Connectivity Broad product portfolio Laird Connectivity Expensive Linx Technologies Linx Technologies Good value Linx Technologies Innovative Linx Technologies Easy to do business with Linx Technologies Good customer experience Linx Technologies Poor product quality Linx Technologies Broad product portfolio Linx Technologies Expensive TE Connectivity TE Connectivity Good value TE Connectivity Innovative TE Connectivity Easy to do business with TE Connectivity Good customer experience TE Connectivity Poor product quality TE Connectivity Broad product portfolio TE Connectivity Expensive Question Title * 6. Where do you typically purchase electronic component products? Manufacturer website Sales representatives Distributors Others, please specify Question Title * 7. How likely are you to recommend the below brands to others? 1 (Not at all likely) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (Extremely likely) Laird External Antennas Laird External Antennas 1 (Not at all likely) Laird External Antennas 2 Laird External Antennas 3 Laird External Antennas 4 Laird External Antennas 5 Laird External Antennas 6 Laird External Antennas 7 Laird External Antennas 8 Laird External Antennas 9 Laird External Antennas 10 (Extremely likely) Linx Technologies Linx Technologies 1 (Not at all likely) Linx Technologies 2 Linx Technologies 3 Linx Technologies 4 Linx Technologies 5 Linx Technologies 6 Linx Technologies 7 Linx Technologies 8 Linx Technologies 9 Linx Technologies 10 (Extremely likely) TE Connectivity TE Connectivity 1 (Not at all likely) TE Connectivity 2 TE Connectivity 3 TE Connectivity 4 TE Connectivity 5 TE Connectivity 6 TE Connectivity 7 TE Connectivity 8 TE Connectivity 9 TE Connectivity 10 (Extremely likely) Question Title * 8. Please leave your business email address to receive the free coupon from TE Connectivity (First 50 respondents) TE Connectivity and TE are trademarks owned or licensed by the TE Connectivity Ltd. family of companies. Other company or product names might be trademarks of their respective owners. Done