Best Practices in Pediatrics Emergency Medicine 2017 | Evaluation

Date & location: Friday, March10, 2016 Glacier Canyon Lodge, Wisconsin Dells, Wis.
Program ID: 117146

Friday, March 10
7:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.

Please evaluate only the simulation stations you attended.

Question Title

* 1. For each learning objective, my assessment of my level of competence/performance or knowledge related to this simulation station (Pediatric resuscitation (simulation infant) by Ryan Scheper, MD and Matt Gray, MD)

  Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor
Dr. Scheper: The speaker's level of expertise regarding content presented was
Dr. Scheper: The quality of the discussion was
Dr. Scheper: The material presented met the objectives
Dr. Gray: The speaker's level of expertise regarding content presented was
Dr. Gray: The quality of the discussion was
Dr. Gray: The material presented met the objectives

Question Title

* 2. For each learning objective, my assessment of my level of competence/performance or knowledge related to this simulation station (Pediatric resuscitation (simulation infant) by Ryan Scheper, MD and Matt Gray, MD)

  Excellent Above Average Good Developing Not applicable
Recognize severe pediatric diseases and consider a prioritized differential diagnosis
Recognize impending cardiorespiratory failure and develop an approach to emergent management and support
Identify pediatric patients that emergently require life-saving interventions and initiate care using the PALS algorithms

Question Title

* 3. After this simulation, I feel that I will be able to better manage this patient population (Pediatric resuscitation (simulation infant) by Ryan Scheper, MD and Matt Gray, MD)

Question Title

* 4. For each learning objective, my assessment of my level of competence/performance or knowledge related to this simulation station (Pediatric trauma (simulation child) by Jean Pearce, MD and Lindsey Query, MD)

  Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor
Dr. Pearce: The speaker's level of expertise regarding content presented was
Dr. Pearce: The quality of the discussion was
Dr. Pearce: The material presented met the objectives
Dr. Query: The speaker's level of expertise regarding content presented was
Dr. Query: The quality of the discussion was
Dr. Query: The material presented met the objectives

Question Title

* 5. For each learning objective, my assessment of my level of competence/performance or knowledge related to this simulation station (Pediatric trauma (simulation child) by Jean Pearce, MD and Lindsey Query, MD)

  Excellent Above Average Good Developing Not applicable
Demonstrate the initial management of a traumatically injured child
Recognize and manage a traumatically injured child with altered mental status
Recognize and manage pediatric shock in the setting of traumatic injury

Question Title

* 6. After this simulation, I feel that I will be able to better manage this patient population (Pediatric trauma (simulation child) by Jean Pearce, MD and Lindsey Query, MD)

Question Title

* 7. For each learning objective, my assessment of my level of competence/performance or knowledge related to this simulation station (Pediatric Procedures Part 1: Lacerations by John Cox, MD, and Megan Schultz)

  Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor
Dr. Cox: The speaker's level of expertise regarding content presented was
Dr. Cox: The quality of the discussion was
Dr. Cox: The material presented met the objectives
Dr. Schultz: The speaker's level of expertise regarding content presented was
Dr. Schultz: The quality of the discussion was
Dr. Schultz: The material presented met the objectives

Question Title

* 8. For each learning objective, my assessment of my level of competence/performance or knowledge related to this simulation station (Pediatric Procedures Part 1: Lacerations by John Cox, MD, and Megan Schultz)

  Excellent Above Average Good Developing Not applicable
Demonstrate common pediatric procedures
Provide opportunities to practice common pediatrics procedures
Discuss the management of foreign body ingestions

Question Title

* 9. After this simulation, I feel that I will be able to better manage this patient population (Pediatric Procedures Part 1: Lacerations by John Cox, MD, and Megan Schultz)

Question Title

* 10. For each learning objective, my assessment of my level of competence/performance or knowledge related to this simulation station (Pediatric Procedures Part 2: Foreign Bodies by Abby Schuh, MD and Shannon Baumer-Mouradian, MD)

  Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor
Dr. Ferguson: The speaker's level of expertise regarding content presented was
Dr. Ferguson: The quality of the discussion was
Dr. Ferguson: The material presented met the objectives
Dr. Daumer-Mouradian: The speaker's level of expertise regarding content presented was
Dr. Daumer-Mouradian: The quality of the discussion was
Dr. Daumer-Mouradain: The material presented met the objectives

Question Title

* 11. For each learning objective, my assessment of my level of competence/performance or knowledge related to this simulation station (Pediatric Procedures Part 2: Foreign Bodies by Abby Schuh, MD and Shannon Baumer-Mouradian, MD)

  Excellent Above Average Good Developing Not applicable
Provide opportunities to practices foreign body removal techniques
Discuss the management of foreign body ingestions

Question Title

* 12. After this simulation, I feel that I will be able to better manage this patient population (Pediatric Procedures Part 2: Foreign Bodies by Abby Schuh, MD and Shannon Baumer-Mouradian, MD)

Question Title

* 13. For each learning objective, my assessment of my level of competence/performance or knowledge related to this simulation station (Splinting (hands on) by Allison Duey-Holtz, APNP, Christa Thalacker, APNP and Kilah Wenzel-Terhardt, PA-C)

  Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor
Dr. Duey-Holtz: The speaker's level of expertise regarding content presented was
Dr. Duey-Holtz: The quality of the discussion was
Dr. Duey-Holtz: The material presented met the objectives
Dr. Thalacker: The speaker's level of expertise regarding content presented was
Dr. Thalacker: The quality of the discussion was
Dr. Thalacker: The material presented met the objectives
Dr. Wenzel-Terhardt: The speaker's level of expertise regarding content presented was
Dr. Wenzel-Terhardt: The quality of the discussion was
Dr. Wenzel-Terhardt: The material presented met the objectives

Question Title

* 14. For each learning objective, my assessment of my level of competence/performance or knowledge related to this simulation station (Splinting (hands on) by Allison Duey-Holtz, APNP, Christa Thalacker, APNP and Kilah Wenzel-Terhardt, PA-C)

  Excellent Above Average Good Developing Not applicable
Perform initial care of child with a musculoskeletal injury including knowledge of when radiographs and treated are needed
Provide basic acute pediatric fracture care including immobilization, pain management and follow up recommendations
Perform initial splinting care

Question Title

* 15. After this simulation, I feel that I will be able to better manage this patient population (Splinting (hands on) by Allison Duey-Holtz, APNP, Christa Thalacker, APNP and Kilah Wenzel-Terhardt, PA-C)

Question Title

* 16. For each learning objective, my assessment of my level of competence/performance or knowledge related to this simulation station (Pediatric Pain/Sedation by Amy Drendel, DO and Nick Kuehnel, MD)

  Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor
Dr. Drendel: The speaker's level of expertise regarding content presented was
Dr. Drendel: The quality of the discussion was
Dr. Drendel: The material presented met the objectives
Dr. Kuehnel: The speaker's level of expertise regarding content presented was
Dr. Kuehnel: The quality of the discussion was
Dr. Kuehnel: The material presented met the objectives

Question Title

* 17. For each learning objective, my assessment of my level of competence/performance or knowledge related to this simulation station (Pediatric Pain/Sedation by Amy Drendel, DO and Nick Kuehnel, MD)

  Excellent Above Average Good Developing Not applicable
Utilize pain assessment tools recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics 
Develop an evidence-based approach to treating pediatric pain
Recognize the effects of inadequate pain treatment
Discuss HOT TOPICS of Pediatric Pain Control

Question Title

* 18. After this simulation, I feel that I will be able to better manage this patient population (Pediatric Pain/Sedation by Nick Kuehnel, MD)

Question Title

* 19. For each learning objective, my assessment of my level of competence/performance or knowledge related to this simulation station (X-Rays by David Vyles, DO)

  Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor
Dr. Morrison: The speaker's level of expertise regarding content presented was
Dr. Morrison: The quality of the discussion was
Dr. Morrison: The material presented met the objectives
Dr. Vyles: The speaker's level of expertise regarding content presented was
Dr. Vyles: The quality of the discussion was
Dr. Vyles: The material presented met the objectives

Question Title

* 20. For each learning objective, my assessment of my level of competence/performance or knowledge related to this simulation station (X-Rays by David Vyles, DO)

  Excellent Above Average Good Developing Not applicable
Understand the utility of pain x-ray for neck, chest, abdominal, and orthopedic conditions
Understand common findings in plain x-ray
To describe differences in pediatric vs. adult plain x-rays for certain conditions

Question Title

* 21. After this simulation, I feel that I will be able to better manage this patient population (X-Rays by David Vyles, DO)

( Privacy & Cookie Notice

T