AWRC Center for Continuing Medical Education Internal Medicine Review Day 4 Evaluation Thursday 7/19/2018 Question Title * 1. Title MD DO Resident DPM PA Nurse Practitioner Other Other (please specify) Question Title * 2. To help us evaluate the successfulness of our educational activity, please list changes you intend to make in your current role as a result of attending this activity:(i.e., Change/improve strategies for treatment of pulmonary patients based on evidence presented) 1 2 Question Title * 3. Was the content free of bias? Yes No If you selected No, please indicate bias perceived during this presentation. Question Title * 4. Faculty Evaluation:Office of Dermatology - Part I -- Katherine Fiala, MD (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5) Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5) Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5) Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5) Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5) Excellent Comment: Question Title * 5. Faculty Evaluation:Pain Management - PEARLS and Pitfalls -- Laurel Kilpatrick, MD (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5) Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5) Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5) Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5) Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5) Excellent Comment: Question Title * 6. Faculty Evaluation:Palliative Care: It's Not Just for the End of Life -- Mark Casanova, MD (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5) Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5) Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5) Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5) Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5) Excellent Comment: Question Title * 7. Faculty Evaluation:Office of Dermatology - Part II -- Katherine Fiala, MD (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5) Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5) Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5) Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5) Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5) Excellent Comment: Question Title * 8. Faculty Evaluation:Cases in Outpatient Psychiatry -- James Bourgeois, MD (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5) Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5) Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5) Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5) Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5) Excellent Comment: Question Title * 9. Faculty Evaluation:The Case for Integrating Psychiatry and Primary Care* -- James Bourgeois, MD (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5) Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5) Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5) Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5) Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5) Excellent (*Ethics)Comment: Question Title * 10. Other Comments: Done
