Recognizing & Diagnosing Epilepsy in Primary Care (CURE Activity)

 
 100% 
We are pleased that you participated in one of our SOWEGA-AHEC educational programs. Please take the time to fill out this evaluation survey, so that we can improve future programs.

For continuing education certificate, completion and submission of evaluation is required. Continuing education certificates will be mailed to the participants.

1. Please provide your name and email address so that we may identify registrants that complete the evaluation survey for continuing education certificates. We will send reminder emails to those that do not complete the evaluation survey.

*
2. Please indicate your professional degree.

3. Did you participate in the SOWEGA-AHEC CURE activity from your organization's facilities?

4. If yes, were there other individuals who viewed the presentation with you?

5. If yes, and they were not pre-registered, please provide their names and email addresses, so we may have a complete record of participants and be able to forward evaluation link to them.

*
6. At the end of this presentation, the participant should be able to:

 Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Describe the diagnostic evaluation process to distinguish epileptic and non-epileptic attacks.
Describe the use of video-EEG monitoring in achieving a diagnosis for individuals with drug-resistant seizures
Describe and balance the treatment options for the newly diagnosed and refractory patients.

*
7. Please rate the following aspects of the program content:

 ExcellentGoodFairPoor
Overall Content
Clinical Applications & Objectives Achieved
Presentation Style & Visual Aids

8. How would you rate the quality of instruction?

 Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Instructional materials were well organized.
Instructional methods illustrated the concepts well.
If slides were presented,they will be useful reference.
References and resources provided will assist me.

9. How would you rate the quality of the presentation?

 Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Presenter was clear and to the point.
Presenter demonstrated mastery of the topic.
Methods used to present the materials held my attentions.
Presenter was responsive to questions.

*
10. Do you intend to make changes or apply what you learned to your practice as a result of this program within the next 6 months?

11. Compared to other online activities that you have participated in over the past year, I would rate this program as on a scale from 5 (Great Program) to 1(Needs Improvement):

12. Where did you hear about this specific activity? (Multiple responses allowed.)

13. Please rate the following aspects of the distance-based network.

 Very satisfiedSatisfiedNeutralDissatisfiedVery Dissatisfied
Ease of access to program.
Quality of the video/slides.
Quality of the audio.
Degree of interactivity.

14. Please describe difficulties if any that you encountered in participating in the activity from your location.

15. What one suggestion if any would you recommend to the distance based aspect of the activity?

16. Practice-based learning & improvement CME Needs: Do you have a question in your practice that needs to be answered?

17. Comments:

18. Post Test Question #1

Approximately 20-30% of patients treated for epilepsy will have prove to have an alternative diagnosis after in-patient video EEG?

19. Post Test Question #2

More than 50% of patients with psychogenic non-epileptic attacks have co-existent epilepsy?

20. If you are a student viewing the activity as part of your academic pursuit within a specific course, the following additional responses are required.