Javascript is required for this site to function, please enable.
View Summary    Browse Responses ยป
Page: KOOP Peer Evaluation
1. Name of Evaluator
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
Name:
[ShowReplies]
100.0%12

2. Date of evaluation
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Count
[ShowReplies]12

3. Program evaluated
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Count
[ShowReplies]12

4. Original air date
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Count
[ShowReplies]12

5. Programmer of record
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Count
[ShowReplies]12

6. Programmer of show evaluated (if different from above)
 answered question5
 
skipped question
7
 Response
Count
[ShowReplies]5

Page: Section 1: Basic On Air Technique
7. Was the legal ID given ("K-O-O-P Hornsby Austin")?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes
100.0%12
No 0.0%0

8. How many times was the station identified (not necessarily the legal ID)?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1-2 times
50.0%6
3-4 times
50.0%6
5+ times 0.0%0

9. Was the website mentioned (koop.org)?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes
41.7%5
No
58.3%7

10. How was the programmer's volume?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
Soft 0.0%0
Normal
100.0%12
Loud 0.0%0

11. How was the programmer's rate of speaking?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
Slow
8.3%1
Normal
83.3%10
Fast
8.3%1

12. How was the programmer's vocal expression or tone?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
Monotone 0.0%0
Average
66.7%8
Expressive
33.3%4

13. How often were vocal pauses heard ("um," "uh," "and-uh")?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
Never
16.7%2
Rarely
41.7%5
Often
41.7%5

14. How was the programmer's pronunciation/articulation?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
Clear
83.3%10
Occasional Lapse
8.3%1
Unclear
8.3%1

15. Were there any indecencies?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes 0.0%0
No
100.0%12

16. Were there any calls to action?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes
8.3%1
No
91.7%11
If yes, please give specific examples
[ShowReplies]
1

17. On a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the best, please rate the programmer's overall on air technique.
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2
8.3%1
3
16.7%2
4
50.0%6
5
25.0%3
Use the space below for comments. If you scored a 3 or lower, please suggest how the programmer might improve.
[ShowReplies]
8

18. Please add any additional comments regarding the programmer's basic on air technique.
 answered question8
 
skipped question
4
 Response
Count
[ShowReplies]8

Page: Section 2: In-Depth On Air Technique
19. How were the transitions into and out of the program?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4
41.7%5
5
58.3%7
N/A 0.0%0
Comments:
[ShowReplies]
7

20. How is the programmer's reading ability?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3
8.3%1
4 0.0%0
5
25.0%3
N/A
66.7%8
Comments:
[ShowReplies]
3

21. How is the pacing/flow or the program?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3
25.0%3
4
16.7%2
5
58.3%7
N/A 0.0%0
Comments:
[ShowReplies]
7

22. How is the programmer's interviewing technique?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3
8.3%1
4
16.7%2
5
58.3%7
N/A
16.7%2
Comments:
[ShowReplies]
8

23. How was the programmer's call-in technique?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4 0.0%0
5 0.0%0
N/A
100.0%12
Comments: 0

24. How is the programmer's over-all radio hygiene (mic volume, segue, familiarity with the board)?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2
8.3%1
3 0.0%0
4
25.0%3
5
58.3%7
N/A
8.3%1
Comments:
[ShowReplies]
6

25. How well did the programmer offer any interesting comments or data to gain the audience's attention?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2
8.3%1
3
16.7%2
4
16.7%2
5
58.3%7
N/A 0.0%0
Comments:
[ShowReplies]
10

26. How clearly did the programmer define areas of discussion?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1
8.3%1
2 0.0%0
3
16.7%2
4
8.3%1
5
58.3%7
N/A
8.3%1
Comments:
[ShowReplies]
8

27. How thoroughly were topics developed?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2
8.3%1
3
8.3%1
4
33.3%4
5
41.7%5
N/A
8.3%1
Comments:
[ShowReplies]
5

28. How effective was the use of information (i.e. examples to clarify facts)?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4
16.7%2
5
41.7%5
N/A
41.7%5
Comments:
[ShowReplies]
3

29. Was the topic choice suitable to the program?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1
8.3%1
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4
8.3%1
5
83.3%10
N/A 0.0%0
Comments:
[ShowReplies]
6

30. Rate the content presented in the program.
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1
8.3%1
2 0.0%0
3
16.7%2
4
25.0%3
5
50.0%6
N/A 0.0%0
Comments:
[ShowReplies]
5

31. Rate the quality of research.
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4
33.3%4
5
50.0%6
N/A
16.7%2
Comments:
[ShowReplies]
4

32. Rate the variety of sources.
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4
16.7%2
5
25.0%3
N/A
58.3%7
Comments:
[ShowReplies]
1

33. How likely are you to hear similar content on other Austin radio stations (1 being very likely and 5 being not at all likely)?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3
16.7%2
4
8.3%1
5
75.0%9
Comments:
[ShowReplies]
7

Page: Section 3: Show Compliance
34. Is this show unique compared to other shows on KOOP (1 being not very unique and 5 being very unique)?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3
8.3%1
4
16.7%2
5
75.0%9
Comments:
[ShowReplies]
6

35. How well does the program facilitate KOOP's mission?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3
8.3%1
4 0.0%0
5
91.7%11
Comments:
[ShowReplies]
5

36. Does the show enhance KOOP's image in the community?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3
16.7%2
4 0.0%0
5
83.3%10
N/A 0.0%0
Comments:
[ShowReplies]
5

Page: Section 4: Music (If Applicable)
37. Is the music consistent with the show description?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1
16.7%2
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4 0.0%0
5
16.7%2
N/A
66.7%8
Comments:
[ShowReplies]
4

38. Does the programmer sound informative about the music played?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3 0.0%0
4 0.0%0
5
16.7%2
N/A
83.3%10
Other (please specify)
[ShowReplies]
1

39. How did the music flow? How were the transitions and segues?
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2
8.3%1
3 0.0%0
4
8.3%1
5
16.7%2
N/A
66.7%8
Comments:
[ShowReplies]
2

Page: Section 5: Additional Comments
40. Use the space below for any additional comments about the program/programmer.
 answered question12
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Count
[ShowReplies]12

Find...
Show replies
Hide replies