Javascript is required for this site to function, please enable.
Page:  
1. How many TOTAL students from your graduate program will be applying in the fall for internship placements for the 2014-2015 training year?
 answered question95
 
skipped question
2
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
0 0.0%0
1
1.1%1
2 0.0%0
3
3.2%3
4
15.8%15
5
8.4%8
6
16.8%16
7
6.3%6
8
6.3%6
9
3.2%3
10
4.2%4
11
2.1%2
12
6.3%6
13
2.1%2
14
1.1%1
15
1.1%1
16
3.2%3
17
4.2%4
19
1.1%1
20 0.0%0
21-25
3.2%3
26-30
4.2%4
31-35
2.1%2
36-40
1.1%1
41-50 0.0%0
51-60
1.1%1
61-70 0.0%0
71-80 0.0%0
81-90
1.1%1
91-100 0.0%0
101-120 0.0%0
121-140 0.0%0
141-160 0.0%0
161-180 0.0%0
181-200 0.0%0
>200
1.1%1

2. What are your doctoral program requirements for the type of internship your students are approved to attend (check all that apply): 
 answered question93
 
skipped question
4
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
An accredited internship (APA or CPA)
80.6%75
APPIC Member program
58.1%54
CAPIC Member program
8.6%8
An internship that meets CDSPP guidelines (Council of Directors of School Psychology Programs)
10.8%10
We do not specify requirements
6.5%6

3. How many TOTAL first-year students will start your graduate program in the fall of 2013? (This information will provide APPIC an estimate of the numbers of students expected to apply for internship 4 - 5 years from now.)
 answered question95
 
skipped question
2
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
0
1.1%1
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3
2.1%2
4
8.4%8
5
13.7%13
6
13.7%13
7
12.6%12
8
12.6%12
9
4.2%4
10
1.1%1
11
3.2%3
12
3.2%3
13
2.1%2
14
1.1%1
15
4.2%4
16
1.1%1
17
1.1%1
19
1.1%1
20
1.1%1
21-25
3.2%3
26-30
5.3%5
31-35 0.0%0
36-40
1.1%1
41-50 0.0%0
51-60
1.1%1
61-70 0.0%0
71-80 0.0%0
81-90 0.0%0
91-100 0.0%0
101-120
1.1%1
121-140 0.0%0
141-160 0.0%0
161-180 0.0%0
181-200 0.0%0
>200
1.1%1

4. How satisfied are you with the communication provided to you by the internship Training Directors working with your students?
 answered question94
 
skipped question
3
 Very DissatisfiedSomewhat DissatisfiedNeutralSomewhat SatisfiedVery SatisfiedRating
Average
Rating
Count
0.0% (0)8.5% (8)17.0% (16)45.7% (43)28.7% (27)3.9594

5. Given goals of Courageous Conversations I and II, how has your program modified the number of students entering into your program?
 answered question77
 
skipped question
20
 Response
Count
 77

6. Please provide any comments on communication between graduate programs and internship programs.

NOTE: The APPIC Board recognizes that communication between doctoral programs and internship programs is a TEAM process, and that there is an expectation that Internship Training Directors provide feedback to Directors of Clinical Training. Please see the  CCTC guidelines about communication:

CCTC Guidelines for Communication between Graduate Programs and Internship Programs
 answered question41
 
skipped question
56
 Response
Count
 41

7. Please share your ideas with the APPIC Board about how to increase APPIC's effectiveness as an organization dedicated to psychology internship and postdoctoral training, priorities for APPIC, or future directions.
 answered question55
 
skipped question
42
 Response
Count
 55

8. What types of articles / topics would you like to see published in the TEPP Journal?
 answered question33
 
skipped question
64
 Response
Count
 33

9. Did you and your students participate in the Phase 2 Match process?
 answered question95
 
skipped question
2
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes
60.0%57
No
40.0%38

Page:  
10. Please specify if you or any of your students experienced any difficulties with the following activities during PHASE 2 of the Match:
 answered question54
 
skipped question
43
 No DifficultyLittle DifficultyModerate DifficultyQuite A Bit of DifficultyGreat Deal of DifficultyRating
Average
Rating
Count
Understanding the instructions on the APPIC and NMS web sites for participating in Phase 266.7% (36)27.8% (15)5.6% (3)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)1.3954
Using the AAPI Online service to update and submit applications during Phase 2 via the AAPI Online service72.2% (39)25.9% (14)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)1.9% (1)1.3354
Accessing the List of Unfilled Positions on the NMS web site70.4% (38)25.9% (14)3.7% (2)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)1.3354
Accessing the APPIC Directory Online to obtain information about programs77.8% (42)20.4% (11)0.0% (0)1.9% (1)0.0% (0)1.2654
Entering and submitting my Rank Order List for Phase 2 of the Match80.4% (41)17.6% (9)2.0% (1)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)1.2251

11. You may recall that the timeline for Phase 2 of the Match was:        

Friday, Feb 22:  List of programs with unfilled positions is posted, applicants begin submitting applications        
Thursday, Febrary 28:  Deadline for submission of applications        
Monday, March 18:  Phase 2 Rank Order List deadline        
Monday, March 25:  Phase II Match Day

Please respond to the following items about the timing of the process:
 answered question54
 
skipped question
43
 Too ShortAbout RightToo LongRating
Average
Rating
Count
Amount of time to review list of unfilled positions and submit applications (6 days)20.4% (11)72.2% (39)7.4% (4)1.8754
Amount of time to interview and submit Rank Order List (18 days)9.4% (5)75.5% (40)15.1% (8)2.0653
Amount of time to wait for results (7 days)1.9% (1)81.1% (43)17.0% (9)2.1553
Overall length from beginning to end (just over one month)9.4% (5)71.7% (38)18.9% (10)2.0953

12. This item asks you to compare Phase 2 of the Match with the old APPIC "Clearinghouse," which was discontinued in 2010.  In the Clearinghouse process, applicants would apply for vacancies as quickly as possible while programs would make relatively quick decisions regarding whom to interview and to whom they would make offers. Based on what you experienced or heard about the old APPIC Clearinghouse, and using your experience in Phase 2 of the APPIC Match, please compare the Clearinghouse and Phase 2 on the following dimensions: (Please skip this item if you do not know enough about the Clearinghouse to make comparisons)
 answered question51
 
skipped question
46
 Clearinghouse was a lot betterClearinghouse was somewhat betterAbout the same / UnsurePhase 2 was somewhat betterPhase 2 was a lot betterRating
Average
Rating
Count
Fairness to applicants0.0% (0)6.0% (3)4.0% (2)22.0% (11)68.0% (34)4.5250
Orderliness of the process2.0% (1)0.0% (0)4.0% (2)16.0% (8)78.0% (39)4.6850
Amount of pressure on applicants2.0% (1)3.9% (2)23.5% (12)23.5% (12)47.1% (24)4.1051
Your overall opinion of the Clearinghouse vs. the Match Phase 24.0% (2)4.0% (2)6.0% (3)14.0% (7)72.0% (36)4.4650

13. Should APPIC continue to offer a "Phase 2" of the Match in future years?
 answered question53
 
skipped question
44
 Strongly DisagreeDisagreeUnsure / NeutralAgreeStrongly AgreeRating
Average
Rating
Count
1.9% (1)1.9% (1)3.8% (2)18.9% (10)73.6% (39)4.6053

14. What did you like about PHASE 2 of the APPIC Match? (You may enter as much information as you wish - the text area will expand as you type)
 answered question35
 
skipped question
62
 Response
Count
 35

15. What did you dislike or find problematic about PHASE 2 of the APPIC Match?  What suggestions do you have for improvement? (You may enter as much information as you wish - the text area will expand as you type)
 answered question30
 
skipped question
67
 Response
Count
 30

16. If students from your program withdrew from the Match, please explain why they withdrew. (You may enter as much information as you wish - the text area will expand as you type)
 answered question32
 
skipped question
65
 Response
Count
 32

17. For students from your program that did not obtain an internship through the APPIC Match, how else were they able to find an internship?
 answered question40
 
skipped question
57
 Response
Count
 40

Page:  
18. APPIC is interested in your view of the value of postdoctoral training in the sequence of training for professional psychology. Please rank order the following statements regarding the value or purpose of postdoctoral training (Indicate your rankings by dragging items or by changing their numerical value. It may falsely appear as though item ranks do not change due to similarity in the sentence stems)..
 answered question78
 
skipped question
19
 12345678Rating
Average
Rating
Count
to obtain advanced or specialized training in a particular area64.1% (50)21.8% (17)10.3% (8)3.8% (3)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)1.5478
to further training in areas were competence has not yet been developed6.4% (5)17.9% (14)26.9% (21)20.5% (16)14.1% (11)5.1% (4)1.3% (1)7.7% (6)3.7778
in lieu of or as a stepping stone to a staff position0.0% (0)3.8% (3)14.1% (11)19.2% (15)16.7% (13)17.9% (14)9.0% (7)19.2% (15)5.3578
to further develop in areas of professionalism0.0% (0)9.0% (7)15.4% (12)20.5% (16)21.8% (17)21.8% (17)6.4% (5)5.1% (4)4.7278
to obtain supervision hours for licensure21.8% (17)23.1% (18)12.8% (10)11.5% (9)16.7% (13)5.1% (4)3.8% (3)5.1% (4)3.3578
to obtain research and academic skills7.7% (6)20.5% (16)15.4% (12)7.7% (6)11.5% (9)17.9% (14)12.8% (10)6.4% (5)4.3278
to obtain consultation skills in a medical setting0.0% (0)0.0% (0)1.3% (1)6.4% (5)7.7% (6)20.5% (16)44.9% (35)19.2% (15)6.5978
to obtain leadership/administrative skills0.0% (0)3.8% (3)3.8% (3)10.3% (8)11.5% (9)11.5% (9)21.8% (17)37.2% (29)6.3778

19. Do you have any additional feedback you would like to provide the APPIC Board?
 answered question23
 
skipped question
74
 Response
Count
 23

20. Please enter your four digit APPIC program number to verify you are the DCT representing this site.
 answered question68
 
skipped question
29
 Response
Count
 68

Find...
Show replies
Hide replies