Peer Review Assessment 2010

Question Title

* 1. Case Title:

Question Title

* 2. Your name:

Question Title

* 3. CONTENT

  5. Strongly Agree 4. Agree 3. Neutral 2. Disagree 1. Strongly Disagree
The case provided adequate information to the user.
The level of knowledge in the case was appropriate for graduating medical students.
The learning objectives of the case were clearly stated.
The learning objectives of the case were met satisfactorily.
The progression of the case was logical.
The case will assist students in their comprehension of key ideas.
The explanations for correct answers were accurate.
The explanations for correct answers were up to date .
The explanations for correct answers were complete .
The explanations for incorrect answers were accurate.
The explanations for incorrect answers were up to date.
The explanations for incorrect answers were complete.
The critique summed up the key concepts of the case.
The references were current.
The references were appropriate to the learning objectives.

Question Title

* 4. This case could be improved by

Question Title

* 5. The best aspect of this case was

Question Title

* 6. LAYOUT

  5. Strongly Agree 4. Agree 3. Neutral 2. Disagree 1. Strongly Disagree
I found it easy to navigate through the case.
The instructions for navigation were clear.
The structure of the case will assist students in their comprehension of key ideas.
The images in the case were relevant.
The images in the case will aid in the learning of key concepts.

Question Title

* 7. Please explain how the structure of the case could be improved.

Question Title

* 8. RECOMMENDATION:

Question Title

* 9. FINAL COMMENTS:

T