Sharpness Dock November Consultation Survey

Question Title

* 1. Do you support the emerging Local Plan’s policy for Sharpness Docks estate and the Vision for the area that it aims to deliver: protect and preserve the setting and rich environment of the Severn Estuary, whilst promoting a prosperous port, thriving tourism destination and very special place to live?

Strongly support

Support

Neutral

Do not support

Strongly do not support

Any comments?

Question Title

* 2. Do you agree that the proposals you have seen will facilitate the delivery of that Vision?

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Do not agree

Strongly do not agree

Any comments?

Question Title

* 3. We have looked at several different access options for the site and are proposing two possible options.

Option 1 provides a bridge across the embankment from Oldminister Road down through the archways of the high bridge. Improvements to Oldminster Road would be part of this option to ensure residents on the street are not adversely affected.

Option 2 creates a new stretch of road which accesses the new housing site at the same point under thehigh bridge, but forks off Oldminster Road closer to Sharpness-Newtown.

Which option do you prefer and why?

Prefer Option 1

Prefer Option 2

Prefer and alternative?

Question Title

* 4. Thinking about how to use and create new open spaces on the island site, which ideas do you like for the former Pleasure Grounds? Please tick all that apply:

Labyrinth or maze

Wildflower meadow

Both permanent and temporary art works

Sculpture Trail

Bird hides

Large land art sculpture

Football pitch

Any other ideas/ comments?

Question Title

* 5. Thinking about community facilities which would you like to see in the proposals, please let us know what you think of the following. Are there any others you would like to see provided?

Community orchard

Allotments

Community Gardens

New footpaths through ecological corridors

Improvements to existing football pitch

Children's play spaces/ playgrounds

Any other ideas/ comments?

Question Title

* 6. What do you think about the following ideas to bring more tourists into the area? Please tick all that apply.

A large boat to be moored in the canal as a venue for water sports training and activities

Water sports training on the basin

Wood cabins and eco-lodges

Tree houses/ fixed camping structures

A re-built cottage with tea-rooms and a cottage garden

Any other comments/ ideas?

Question Title

* 7. What do you think about the layout of the new housing in the north east of the site?

Unsure

Dislike

Comments?

Question Title

* 8. Are there any types of housing you would like to see on the site? Can you give any examples of new housing developments which you would like to see on the site?

Unsure

Dislike

Comments?

Question Title

* 9. We are intending to put two new marina basins surrounded by apartments just north of the high level bridge. The basin on the island site would also have facilities for canal boat users (e.g. showers, chandlery/shop etc.) What do you think about these?

Unsure

Dislike

Comments?

	Yes	No
Expanded marina basins and canal users’ facilities	Expanded marina basins and canal users’ facilities Yes	Expanded marina basins and canal users’ facilities No
Re-created Pleasure Grounds	Re-created Pleasure Grounds Yes	Re-created Pleasure Grounds No
Usable basin at Old Arm	Usable basin at Old Arm Yes	Usable basin at Old Arm No
Café facilities	Café facilities Yes	Café facilities No
Interpretation boards of the area’s history	Interpretation boards of the area’s history Yes	Interpretation boards of the area’s history No
More footpaths	More footpaths Yes	More footpaths No
Railway heritage e.g. a re-created station building and working trains – if that becomes feasible	Railway heritage e.g. a re-created station building and working trains – if that becomes feasible Yes	Railway heritage e.g. a re-created station building and working trains – if that becomes feasible No

Yes

Expanded marina basins and canal users’ facilities

Expanded marina basins and canal users’ facilities Yes

Expanded marina basins and canal users’ facilities No

Re-created Pleasure Grounds

Re-created Pleasure Grounds Yes

Re-created Pleasure Grounds No

Usable basin at Old Arm

Usable basin at Old Arm Yes

Usable basin at Old Arm No

Café facilities

Café facilities Yes

Café facilities No

Interpretation boards of the area’s history

Interpretation boards of the area’s history Yes

Interpretation boards of the area’s history No

More footpaths

More footpaths Yes

More footpaths No

Railway heritage e.g. a re-created station building and working trains – if that becomes feasible

Railway heritage e.g. a re-created station building and working trains – if that becomes feasible Yes

Railway heritage e.g. a re-created station building and working trains – if that becomes feasible No

	Very likely	Likely	Unsure	Unlikely	Very Unlikely
Expanded marina basins and canal users’ facilities	Expanded marina basins and canal users’ facilities Very likely	Expanded marina basins and canal users’ facilities Likely	Expanded marina basins and canal users’ facilities Unsure	Expanded marina basins and canal users’ facilities Unlikely	Expanded marina basins and canal users’ facilities Very Unlikely
Re-created Pleasure Grounds	Re-created Pleasure Grounds Very likely	Re-created Pleasure Grounds Likely	Re-created Pleasure Grounds Unsure	Re-created Pleasure Grounds Unlikely	Re-created Pleasure Grounds Very Unlikely
Usable basin at Old Arm	Usable basin at Old Arm Very likely	Usable basin at Old Arm Likely	Usable basin at Old Arm Unsure	Usable basin at Old Arm Unlikely	Usable basin at Old Arm Very Unlikely
Café facilities	Café facilities Very likely	Café facilities Likely	Café facilities Unsure	Café facilities Unlikely	Café facilities Very Unlikely
Interpretation boards of the area’s history	Interpretation boards of the area’s history Very likely	Interpretation boards of the area’s history Likely	Interpretation boards of the area’s history Unsure	Interpretation boards of the area’s history Unlikely	Interpretation boards of the area’s history Very Unlikely
More footpaths	More footpaths Very likely	More footpaths Likely	More footpaths Unsure	More footpaths Unlikely	More footpaths Very Unlikely
Railway heritage e.g. a re-created station building and working trains – if that becomes feasible	Railway heritage e.g. a re-created station building and working trains – if that becomes feasible Very likely	Railway heritage e.g. a re-created station building and working trains – if that becomes feasible Likely	Railway heritage e.g. a re-created station building and working trains – if that becomes feasible Unsure	Railway heritage e.g. a re-created station building and working trains – if that becomes feasible Unlikely	Railway heritage e.g. a re-created station building and working trains – if that becomes feasible Very Unlikely

Very likely

Likely

Unsure

Unlikely

Very Unlikely

Expanded marina basins and canal users’ facilities

Expanded marina basins and canal users’ facilities Very likely

Expanded marina basins and canal users’ facilities Likely

Expanded marina basins and canal users’ facilities Unsure

Expanded marina basins and canal users’ facilities Unlikely

Expanded marina basins and canal users’ facilities Very Unlikely

Re-created Pleasure Grounds

Re-created Pleasure Grounds Very likely

Re-created Pleasure Grounds Likely

Re-created Pleasure Grounds Unsure

Re-created Pleasure Grounds Unlikely

Re-created Pleasure Grounds Very Unlikely

Usable basin at Old Arm

Usable basin at Old Arm Very likely

Usable basin at Old Arm Likely

Usable basin at Old Arm Unsure

Usable basin at Old Arm Unlikely

Usable basin at Old Arm Very Unlikely

Café facilities

Café facilities Very likely

Café facilities Likely

Café facilities Unsure

Café facilities Unlikely

Café facilities Very Unlikely

Interpretation boards of the area’s history

Interpretation boards of the area’s history Very likely

Interpretation boards of the area’s history Likely

Interpretation boards of the area’s history Unsure

Interpretation boards of the area’s history Unlikely

Interpretation boards of the area’s history Very Unlikely

More footpaths

More footpaths Very likely

More footpaths Likely

More footpaths Unsure

More footpaths Unlikely

More footpaths Very Unlikely

Railway heritage e.g. a re-created station building and working trains – if that becomes feasible

Railway heritage e.g. a re-created station building and working trains – if that becomes feasible Very likely

Railway heritage e.g. a re-created station building and working trains – if that becomes feasible Likely

Railway heritage e.g. a re-created station building and working trains – if that becomes feasible Unsure

Railway heritage e.g. a re-created station building and working trains – if that becomes feasible Unlikely

Railway heritage e.g. a re-created station building and working trains – if that becomes feasible Very Unlikely

Sharpness Dock November Consultation

Your Feedback

Question Title

Question Title

* 2. Do you agree that the proposals you have seen will facilitate the delivery of that Vision?

Question Title

Question Title

* 4. Thinking about how to use and create new open spaces on the island site, which ideas do you like for the former Pleasure Grounds? Please tick all that apply:

Question Title

* 5. Thinking about community facilities which would you like to see in the proposals, please let us know what you think of the following. Are there any others you would like to see provided?

Question Title

* 6. What do you think about the following ideas to bring more tourists into the area? Please tick all that apply.

Question Title

* 7. What do you think about the layout of the new housing in the north east of the site?

Question Title

* 8. Are there any types of housing you would like to see on the site? Can you give any examples of new housing developments which you would like to see on the site?

Question Title

* 9. We are intending to put two new marina basins surrounded by apartments just north of the high level bridge. The basin on the island site would also have facilities for canal boat users (e.g. showers, chandlery/shop etc.) What do you think about these?

Question Title

* 10. Do you welcome the proposals below?

Question Title

* 11. How likely would you be to visit the proposals for attractions below?

Question Title

* 12. Is there anything we have missed? Or that you would like to see included in the masterplan?

Question Title

* 13. Do you have any further comments?