Small-cell backhaul report: READER SURVEY Small-cell backhaul report survey: part 1 50% of survey complete. Thank you for agreeing to participate in this survey on Senza Fili's report on small-cell backhaul. If you have downloaded only the conversations we initially published, you can now get the entire report with market overview, vendor profiles and conversations from Senza Fili website at www.senzafiliconsulting.com Question Title 1. What do you think of the report? Please rate the following statements: Highly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Highly agree N/A It is engaging to read It is engaging to read Highly disagree It is engaging to read Disagree It is engaging to read Neutral It is engaging to read Agree It is engaging to read Highly agree It is engaging to read N/A It is clear and easy to understand It is clear and easy to understand Highly disagree It is clear and easy to understand Disagree It is clear and easy to understand Neutral It is clear and easy to understand Agree It is clear and easy to understand Highly agree It is clear and easy to understand N/A I learned something from it that I did not know before I learned something from it that I did not know before Highly disagree I learned something from it that I did not know before Disagree I learned something from it that I did not know before Neutral I learned something from it that I did not know before Agree I learned something from it that I did not know before Highly agree I learned something from it that I did not know before N/A The views are balanced The views are balanced Highly disagree The views are balanced Disagree The views are balanced Neutral The views are balanced Agree The views are balanced Highly agree The views are balanced N/A The analysis made me reconsider my view of the market The analysis made me reconsider my view of the market Highly disagree The analysis made me reconsider my view of the market Disagree The analysis made me reconsider my view of the market Neutral The analysis made me reconsider my view of the market Agree The analysis made me reconsider my view of the market Highly agree The analysis made me reconsider my view of the market N/A Overall, it was well worth reading Overall, it was well worth reading Highly disagree Overall, it was well worth reading Disagree Overall, it was well worth reading Neutral Overall, it was well worth reading Agree Overall, it was well worth reading Highly agree Overall, it was well worth reading N/A Comments/other: Question Title 2. Too little or too much? Too little A bit too little Just right A bit too much Too much Detail Detail Too little Detail A bit too little Detail Just right Detail A bit too much Detail Too much Length Length Too little Length A bit too little Length Just right Length A bit too much Length Too much Emphasis on market analysis Emphasis on market analysis Too little Emphasis on market analysis A bit too little Emphasis on market analysis Just right Emphasis on market analysis A bit too much Emphasis on market analysis Too much Emphasis on vendors Emphasis on vendors Too little Emphasis on vendors A bit too little Emphasis on vendors Just right Emphasis on vendors A bit too much Emphasis on vendors Too much Methodology and sponsorship disclosure Methodology and sponsorship disclosure Too little Methodology and sponsorship disclosure A bit too little Methodology and sponsorship disclosure Just right Methodology and sponsorship disclosure A bit too much Methodology and sponsorship disclosure Too much Comment/Other Question Title 3. Which part of the report did you prefer? Market overview report Vendor profiles Vendor conversations N/A Engaging to read Engaging to read Market overview report Engaging to read Vendor profiles Engaging to read Vendor conversations Engaging to read N/A Presented new information Presented new information Market overview report Presented new information Vendor profiles Presented new information Vendor conversations Presented new information N/A Provided objective assessment Provided objective assessment Market overview report Provided objective assessment Vendor profiles Provided objective assessment Vendor conversations Provided objective assessment N/A Appropriate depth/length Appropriate depth/length Market overview report Appropriate depth/length Vendor profiles Appropriate depth/length Vendor conversations Appropriate depth/length N/A Overall Overall Market overview report Overall Vendor profiles Overall Vendor conversations Overall N/A Comments/other: Question Title 4. Vendor profiles: were they relevant and informative? (Low = not relevant/informative) Very low Low Medium High Very high N/A Altobridge Altobridge Very low Altobridge Low Altobridge Medium Altobridge High Altobridge Very high Altobridge N/A BLiNQ BLiNQ Very low BLiNQ Low BLiNQ Medium BLiNQ High BLiNQ Very high BLiNQ N/A Bluwan Bluwan Very low Bluwan Low Bluwan Medium Bluwan High Bluwan Very high Bluwan N/A CCS CCS Very low CCS Low CCS Medium CCS High CCS Very high CCS N/A Cisco Cisco Very low Cisco Low Cisco Medium Cisco High Cisco Very high Cisco N/A DragonWave DragonWave Very low DragonWave Low DragonWave Medium DragonWave High DragonWave Very high DragonWave N/A Intracom Telecom Intracom Telecom Very low Intracom Telecom Low Intracom Telecom Medium Intracom Telecom High Intracom Telecom Very high Intracom Telecom N/A NEC NEC Very low NEC Low NEC Medium NEC High NEC Very high NEC N/A Proxim Wireless Proxim Wireless Very low Proxim Wireless Low Proxim Wireless Medium Proxim Wireless High Proxim Wireless Very high Proxim Wireless N/A Siklu Siklu Very low Siklu Low Siklu Medium Siklu High Siklu Very high Siklu N/A SOLiD Technologies SOLiD Technologies Very low SOLiD Technologies Low SOLiD Technologies Medium SOLiD Technologies High SOLiD Technologies Very high SOLiD Technologies N/A Tellabs Tellabs Very low Tellabs Low Tellabs Medium Tellabs High Tellabs Very high Tellabs N/A Vubiq Vubiq Very low Vubiq Low Vubiq Medium Vubiq High Vubiq Very high Vubiq N/A Comment/Other Question Title 5. Vendor conversations: did your read them or watch them? Only read Only watched Both, I prefer reading them Both, I prefer watching them I did not read them or watch them Comments/other: Question Title 6. Vendor conversations: which ones did you read or watch? Read Watched Read and watched Did not read or watch Altobridge Altobridge Read Altobridge Watched Altobridge Read and watched Altobridge Did not read or watch BLiNQ BLiNQ Read BLiNQ Watched BLiNQ Read and watched BLiNQ Did not read or watch Bluwan Bluwan Read Bluwan Watched Bluwan Read and watched Bluwan Did not read or watch CCS CCS Read CCS Watched CCS Read and watched CCS Did not read or watch Cisco Cisco Read Cisco Watched Cisco Read and watched Cisco Did not read or watch DragonWave DragonWave Read DragonWave Watched DragonWave Read and watched DragonWave Did not read or watch Intracom Telecom Intracom Telecom Read Intracom Telecom Watched Intracom Telecom Read and watched Intracom Telecom Did not read or watch NEC NEC Read NEC Watched NEC Read and watched NEC Did not read or watch Proxim Wireless Proxim Wireless Read Proxim Wireless Watched Proxim Wireless Read and watched Proxim Wireless Did not read or watch Siklu Siklu Read Siklu Watched Siklu Read and watched Siklu Did not read or watch SOLiD Technologies SOLiD Technologies Read SOLiD Technologies Watched SOLiD Technologies Read and watched SOLiD Technologies Did not read or watch Tellabs Tellabs Read Tellabs Watched Tellabs Read and watched Tellabs Did not read or watch Vubiq Vubiq Read Vubiq Watched Vubiq Read and watched Vubiq Did not read or watch Comment/Other Question Title 7. Vendor conversations: were they relevant and informative? (Low = not relevant/informative) Very low Low Medium High Very high N/A Altobridge Altobridge Very low Altobridge Low Altobridge Medium Altobridge High Altobridge Very high Altobridge N/A BLiNQ BLiNQ Very low BLiNQ Low BLiNQ Medium BLiNQ High BLiNQ Very high BLiNQ N/A Bluwan Bluwan Very low Bluwan Low Bluwan Medium Bluwan High Bluwan Very high Bluwan N/A CCS CCS Very low CCS Low CCS Medium CCS High CCS Very high CCS N/A Cisco Cisco Very low Cisco Low Cisco Medium Cisco High Cisco Very high Cisco N/A DragonWave DragonWave Very low DragonWave Low DragonWave Medium DragonWave High DragonWave Very high DragonWave N/A Intracom Telecom Intracom Telecom Very low Intracom Telecom Low Intracom Telecom Medium Intracom Telecom High Intracom Telecom Very high Intracom Telecom N/A NEC NEC Very low NEC Low NEC Medium NEC High NEC Very high NEC N/A Proxim Wireless Proxim Wireless Very low Proxim Wireless Low Proxim Wireless Medium Proxim Wireless High Proxim Wireless Very high Proxim Wireless N/A Siklu Siklu Very low Siklu Low Siklu Medium Siklu High Siklu Very high Siklu N/A SOLiD Technologies SOLiD Technologies Very low SOLiD Technologies Low SOLiD Technologies Medium SOLiD Technologies High SOLiD Technologies Very high SOLiD Technologies N/A Tellabs Tellabs Very low Tellabs Low Tellabs Medium Tellabs High Tellabs Very high Tellabs N/A Vubiq Vubiq Very low Vubiq Low Vubiq Medium Vubiq High Vubiq Very high Vubiq N/A Comment/Other Next
