ACOG District II : 2013 Annual Meeting Evaluation

Lecture Evaluation - Saturday, October 26, 2013

Please rate the following presenters based upon the quality of their materials and presentation skills.

Question Title

* 1. Anthony T. DiBenedetto, MD, FACS
Bariatric Surgery for the Gynecology Patient

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 2. Andrew M. Kaunitz, MD, FACOG
Menopausal Hormone Therapy: A 2013 Perspective

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 3. Kunle Odunsi, MD, PhD
Recent Progress in Immunotherapy for Ovarian Cancer

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 4. Haywood L. Brown, MD, FACOG
Preconceptional Counseling

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 5. Yitzchak M. Binik, PhD
Is Classification a "DSMal" Science? The American Psychiatric Association of Classification of Female Sexual Dysfunction (DSM-5)

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 6. Linda Bradley, MD, FACOG
Hysteroscopic Resection: Improving Patient Safety, Increasing Outcomes, and Review of Resectoscopy and Morcellator Techniques

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 7. Nicholas Kulbida, MD, FACOG
TeleOBGYN: Are You Ready for This?

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 8. Joanne Stone, MD, FACOG
New Issues in OB Ultrasound (PANEL)

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 9. James Goldberg, MD, FACOG
New Issues in OB Ultrasound (PANEL)

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 10. Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman, MD, FACOG
New Issues in OB Ultrasound (PANEL)

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 11. Angela Bianco, MD, FACOG
New Issues in OB Ultrasound (PANEL)

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 12. Richard L. Berkowitz, MD, FACOG
Intrapartum Management of Category II Fetal Heart Rate Tracings

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)