ACOG District II : 2013 Annual Meeting Evaluation

Lecture Evaluation - Friday, October 25, 2013

Please rate the following presenters based upon the quality of their materials and presentation skills.

Question Title

* 1. Yvonne Thornton, MD, MPH, FACOG, FACS
Obesity in Pregnancy

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 2. Scott Hayworth, MD, FACOG
Accountable Care Organizations and the Move to Value

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 3. James N. Martin, Jr., MD, FACOG
Severe Pre-eclampsia and Eclampsia: Pearls for the Practitioner

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 4. Mark S. DeFrancesco, MD, MBA, FACOG
From Solo Physician to Large Corporate Structures: Changing Practice Models

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 5. Mary E. D'Alton, MD, FACOG
Maternal Mortality Protocols

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 6. John P. Keats, MD, CPE, FACOG, FACPE
New Health Care Payer Practices

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 7. Cynthia Chazotte, MD, FACOG
Anatomy of an Obstetric Loss

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 8. Eva Chalas, MD, FACOG, FACS
Failure to Rescue: Tips to Avoid Adverse Outcomes

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 9. Ronald T. Burkman, MD, FACOG
Shoulder Dystocia: How to Take the Fear Out of Management

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 10. Jason D. Wright, MD, FACOG
Management of Abnormal Cytology

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 11. Mark I. Evans, MD, FACOG FACMG
The Widening Gulf between Genetic Diagnosis and Screening (PANEL)

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 12. Susan Klugman, MD, FACOG, FACMG
The Widening Gulf between Diagnosis and Screening (PANEL)

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 13. Noah D. Kauff, MD, FACOG
Clinical Genetics Assessment in the Gynecology Patient 2013: Integration of Family History and Histologic Evaluation (PANEL)

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 14. Angela G. Arnold, MS, CGC
Clinical Genetics Assessment in the Gynecology Patient 2013: Integration of Family History and Histologic Evaluation (PANEL)

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 15. Robert A. Soslow, MD
Clinical Genetics Assessment in the Gynecology Patient 2013: Integration of Family History and Histologic Evaluation (PANEL)

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 16. Laura MacIsaac, MD, MPH, FACOG
The Future of Fertility Management: Long-Acting Reversible Contraception

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)