Screen Reader Mode Icon

Question Title

* 1. Speaker Name:

Question Title

* 2. Faculty Name:

Scientific Content Review:

Question Title

* 3. To what extent did the speaker clearly define the problem, explain what was novel/important about the research, and place it in context with related work?

Question Title

* 4. Comments:

Question Title

* 5. To what extent did the speaker explain the data as opposed to presenting the authors’ conclusions from the data?

Question Title

* 6. Comments:

Question Title

* 7. To what extent did the speaker offer independent critiques of the presented work?

Question Title

* 8. Comments

Question Title

* 9. To what extent did the speaker effectively summarize the research and describe/suggest future directions?

Question Title

* 10. Commets:

Question Title

* 11. To what extent did the speaker demonstrate command of the subject during the presentation and subsequent question and answer period?

Question Title

* 12. Comments:

Presentation Content Review:

Question Title

* 13. Organization (unifying themes of talk elaborated, clear connection between publications and central theme, smooth flow/segues between examples).

Question Title

* 14. Comments:

Question Title

* 15. Style (clarity, pace, organization, audibility, mannerisms, use of laser pointer).

Question Title

* 16. Comments:

Question Title

* 17. Slides (legibility, style consistency, information density, proper literature citations, originality, (over)reliance on published figures contributions, appropriate use of animations).

Question Title

* 18. Comments:

Question Title

* 19. Choose one:

Question Title

* 20. Comments:

0 of 20 answered
 

T