FRSA National Conference 2014: Evaluation

Your feedback is important to us. Please take a few minutes to complete this form. The information you provide will be used to inform the structure and content of future conferences.

Question Title

* 1. How would you rate your overall experience at the conference?

Very Poor

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Very Good

Comments

Question Title

* 2. What is your the main reason for attending this conference?

The topic/content appealed to me

Networking opportunities

To gain skills and knowledge

To present a session or paper

To hear specific speakers

Question Title

* 3. Please select the best description of your organisation

Family/relationship service provider

Child protection service provider

Mental health service provider

Other community organisation

Legal assistance service

Federal Government Department

State Government Department

University or research institute

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 4. What is your position in this organisation?

Senior Manager

Program leader/manager

Practitioner

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the relevance of this conference to your work?

Low

Moderate

High

Question Title

* 6. Please rate the quality of plenary sessions

	Very Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	Good	Very Good	N/A
Tue 9:00-9:45: The Hon. Kevin Andrews, Minister for Social Services	Tue 9:00-9:45: The Hon. Kevin Andrews, Minister for Social Services Very Poor	Tue 9:00-9:45: The Hon. Kevin Andrews, Minister for Social Services Poor	Tue 9:00-9:45: The Hon. Kevin Andrews, Minister for Social Services Satisfactory	Tue 9:00-9:45: The Hon. Kevin Andrews, Minister for Social Services Good	Tue 9:00-9:45: The Hon. Kevin Andrews, Minister for Social Services Very Good	Tue 9:00-9:45: The Hon. Kevin Andrews, Minister for Social Services N/A
Tue 9:45-10:30: Professor William Doherty (University of Minnesota, USA)	Tue 9:45-10:30: Professor William Doherty (University of Minnesota, USA) Very Poor	Tue 9:45-10:30: Professor William Doherty (University of Minnesota, USA) Poor	Tue 9:45-10:30: Professor William Doherty (University of Minnesota, USA) Satisfactory	Tue 9:45-10:30: Professor William Doherty (University of Minnesota, USA) Good	Tue 9:45-10:30: Professor William Doherty (University of Minnesota, USA) Very Good	Tue 9:45-10:30: Professor William Doherty (University of Minnesota, USA) N/A
Wed 9:00-9:45: Chief Justice Diana Bryant, Family Court Australia	Wed 9:00-9:45: Chief Justice Diana Bryant, Family Court Australia Very Poor	Wed 9:00-9:45: Chief Justice Diana Bryant, Family Court Australia Poor	Wed 9:00-9:45: Chief Justice Diana Bryant, Family Court Australia Satisfactory	Wed 9:00-9:45: Chief Justice Diana Bryant, Family Court Australia Good	Wed 9:00-9:45: Chief Justice Diana Bryant, Family Court Australia Very Good	Wed 9:00-9:45: Chief Justice Diana Bryant, Family Court Australia N/A
Wed 9:45-10:30: Associate Professor Bruce Smyth (Australian Research Council Future Fellow ANU	Wed 9:45-10:30: Associate Professor Bruce Smyth (Australian Research Council Future Fellow ANU Very Poor	Wed 9:45-10:30: Associate Professor Bruce Smyth (Australian Research Council Future Fellow ANU Poor	Wed 9:45-10:30: Associate Professor Bruce Smyth (Australian Research Council Future Fellow ANU Satisfactory	Wed 9:45-10:30: Associate Professor Bruce Smyth (Australian Research Council Future Fellow ANU Good	Wed 9:45-10:30: Associate Professor Bruce Smyth (Australian Research Council Future Fellow ANU Very Good	Wed 9:45-10:30: Associate Professor Bruce Smyth (Australian Research Council Future Fellow ANU N/A
Thur 9:00-9:45: Professor Brigid Daniel (University of Stirling, Scotland)	Thur 9:00-9:45: Professor Brigid Daniel (University of Stirling, Scotland) Very Poor	Thur 9:00-9:45: Professor Brigid Daniel (University of Stirling, Scotland) Poor	Thur 9:00-9:45: Professor Brigid Daniel (University of Stirling, Scotland) Satisfactory	Thur 9:00-9:45: Professor Brigid Daniel (University of Stirling, Scotland) Good	Thur 9:00-9:45: Professor Brigid Daniel (University of Stirling, Scotland) Very Good	Thur 9:00-9:45: Professor Brigid Daniel (University of Stirling, Scotland) N/A
Thur 9:45-10:15: Ms Megan Mitchell, National Children’s Commissioner	Thur 9:45-10:15: Ms Megan Mitchell, National Children’s Commissioner Very Poor	Thur 9:45-10:15: Ms Megan Mitchell, National Children’s Commissioner Poor	Thur 9:45-10:15: Ms Megan Mitchell, National Children’s Commissioner Satisfactory	Thur 9:45-10:15: Ms Megan Mitchell, National Children’s Commissioner Good	Thur 9:45-10:15: Ms Megan Mitchell, National Children’s Commissioner Very Good	Thur 9:45-10:15: Ms Megan Mitchell, National Children’s Commissioner N/A
Throughout: Master of Ceremonies, Professor Richard Chisholm AM	Throughout: Master of Ceremonies, Professor Richard Chisholm AM Very Poor	Throughout: Master of Ceremonies, Professor Richard Chisholm AM Poor	Throughout: Master of Ceremonies, Professor Richard Chisholm AM Satisfactory	Throughout: Master of Ceremonies, Professor Richard Chisholm AM Good	Throughout: Master of Ceremonies, Professor Richard Chisholm AM Very Good	Throughout: Master of Ceremonies, Professor Richard Chisholm AM N/A

Comments

Question Title

* 7. Please rate the quality of panel sessions

	Very Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	Good	Very Good	N/A
Tue 11:00-12:30: Are we there yet – What it takes to build individual, family and community wellbeing	Tue 11:00-12:30: Are we there yet – What it takes to build individual, family and community wellbeing Very Poor	Tue 11:00-12:30: Are we there yet – What it takes to build individual, family and community wellbeing Poor	Tue 11:00-12:30: Are we there yet – What it takes to build individual, family and community wellbeing Satisfactory	Tue 11:00-12:30: Are we there yet – What it takes to build individual, family and community wellbeing Good	Tue 11:00-12:30: Are we there yet – What it takes to build individual, family and community wellbeing Very Good	Tue 11:00-12:30: Are we there yet – What it takes to build individual, family and community wellbeing N/A
Wed 11:00-12:30: Giving a voice to the child – opportunities and challenges for practitioners and policy makers	Wed 11:00-12:30: Giving a voice to the child – opportunities and challenges for practitioners and policy makers Very Poor	Wed 11:00-12:30: Giving a voice to the child – opportunities and challenges for practitioners and policy makers Poor	Wed 11:00-12:30: Giving a voice to the child – opportunities and challenges for practitioners and policy makers Satisfactory	Wed 11:00-12:30: Giving a voice to the child – opportunities and challenges for practitioners and policy makers Good	Wed 11:00-12:30: Giving a voice to the child – opportunities and challenges for practitioners and policy makers Very Good	Wed 11:00-12:30: Giving a voice to the child – opportunities and challenges for practitioners and policy makers N/A
Wed 11:00-12:30: Does evidence from the Social Sciences have any relevance for Family Law? Should it?	Wed 11:00-12:30: Does evidence from the Social Sciences have any relevance for Family Law? Should it? Very Poor	Wed 11:00-12:30: Does evidence from the Social Sciences have any relevance for Family Law? Should it? Poor	Wed 11:00-12:30: Does evidence from the Social Sciences have any relevance for Family Law? Should it? Satisfactory	Wed 11:00-12:30: Does evidence from the Social Sciences have any relevance for Family Law? Should it? Good	Wed 11:00-12:30: Does evidence from the Social Sciences have any relevance for Family Law? Should it? Very Good	Wed 11:00-12:30: Does evidence from the Social Sciences have any relevance for Family Law? Should it? N/A
Thur 11:00-12:30: It Takes A Community To Raise A Child:	Thur 11:00-12:30: It Takes A Community To Raise A Child: Very Poor	Thur 11:00-12:30: It Takes A Community To Raise A Child: Poor	Thur 11:00-12:30: It Takes A Community To Raise A Child: Satisfactory	Thur 11:00-12:30: It Takes A Community To Raise A Child: Good	Thur 11:00-12:30: It Takes A Community To Raise A Child: Very Good	Thur 11:00-12:30: It Takes A Community To Raise A Child: N/A

Comments

Question Title

* 8. Please rate the quality of the following events:

	Very Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	Good	Very Good	N/A
Mon 5:30-7:30PM: Welcome Event	Mon 5:30-7:30PM: Welcome Event Very Poor	Mon 5:30-7:30PM: Welcome Event Poor	Mon 5:30-7:30PM: Welcome Event Satisfactory	Mon 5:30-7:30PM: Welcome Event Good	Mon 5:30-7:30PM: Welcome Event Very Good	Mon 5:30-7:30PM: Welcome Event N/A
Tue 7:30-8:15AM: First timers’ breakfast	Tue 7:30-8:15AM: First timers’ breakfast Very Poor	Tue 7:30-8:15AM: First timers’ breakfast Poor	Tue 7:30-8:15AM: First timers’ breakfast Satisfactory	Tue 7:30-8:15AM: First timers’ breakfast Good	Tue 7:30-8:15AM: First timers’ breakfast Very Good	Tue 7:30-8:15AM: First timers’ breakfast N/A
Wed 6:30-10:30PM: Conference Dinner	Wed 6:30-10:30PM: Conference Dinner Very Poor	Wed 6:30-10:30PM: Conference Dinner Poor	Wed 6:30-10:30PM: Conference Dinner Satisfactory	Wed 6:30-10:30PM: Conference Dinner Good	Wed 6:30-10:30PM: Conference Dinner Very Good	Wed 6:30-10:30PM: Conference Dinner N/A

Comments

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the following:

	Very Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	Good	Very Good	N/A
Structure of Conference Program – mix between plenary, panels & concurrent sessions	Structure of Conference Program – mix between plenary, panels & concurrent sessions Very Poor	Structure of Conference Program – mix between plenary, panels & concurrent sessions Poor	Structure of Conference Program – mix between plenary, panels & concurrent sessions Satisfactory	Structure of Conference Program – mix between plenary, panels & concurrent sessions Good	Structure of Conference Program – mix between plenary, panels & concurrent sessions Very Good	Structure of Conference Program – mix between plenary, panels & concurrent sessions N/A
Admin and support	Admin and support Very Poor	Admin and support Poor	Admin and support Satisfactory	Admin and support Good	Admin and support Very Good	Admin and support N/A
Venue and facilities	Venue and facilities Very Poor	Venue and facilities Poor	Venue and facilities Satisfactory	Venue and facilities Good	Venue and facilities Very Good	Venue and facilities N/A
Quality and variety of catering	Quality and variety of catering Very Poor	Quality and variety of catering Poor	Quality and variety of catering Satisfactory	Quality and variety of catering Good	Quality and variety of catering Very Good	Quality and variety of catering N/A
Value for money	Value for money Very Poor	Value for money Poor	Value for money Satisfactory	Value for money Good	Value for money Very Good	Value for money N/A
Length of conference	Length of conference Very Poor	Length of conference Poor	Length of conference Satisfactory	Length of conference Good	Length of conference Very Good	Length of conference N/A
Conference website	Conference website Very Poor	Conference website Poor	Conference website Satisfactory	Conference website Good	Conference website Very Good	Conference website N/A

Comments

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the quality of the concurrent streams

	Very Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	Good	Very Good	N/A
Valuing Cultural and Linguistic Diversity	Valuing Cultural and Linguistic Diversity Very Poor	Valuing Cultural and Linguistic Diversity Poor	Valuing Cultural and Linguistic Diversity Satisfactory	Valuing Cultural and Linguistic Diversity Good	Valuing Cultural and Linguistic Diversity Very Good	Valuing Cultural and Linguistic Diversity N/A
Building Collaboration with Organisations and Communities	Building Collaboration with Organisations and Communities Very Poor	Building Collaboration with Organisations and Communities Poor	Building Collaboration with Organisations and Communities Satisfactory	Building Collaboration with Organisations and Communities Good	Building Collaboration with Organisations and Communities Very Good	Building Collaboration with Organisations and Communities N/A
Eliciting Client Input and Feedback	Eliciting Client Input and Feedback Very Poor	Eliciting Client Input and Feedback Poor	Eliciting Client Input and Feedback Satisfactory	Eliciting Client Input and Feedback Good	Eliciting Client Input and Feedback Very Good	Eliciting Client Input and Feedback N/A
Strengthening Men and Relationship Services	Strengthening Men and Relationship Services Very Poor	Strengthening Men and Relationship Services Poor	Strengthening Men and Relationship Services Satisfactory	Strengthening Men and Relationship Services Good	Strengthening Men and Relationship Services Very Good	Strengthening Men and Relationship Services N/A
Supporting Strengths-Based Parenting	Supporting Strengths-Based Parenting Very Poor	Supporting Strengths-Based Parenting Poor	Supporting Strengths-Based Parenting Satisfactory	Supporting Strengths-Based Parenting Good	Supporting Strengths-Based Parenting Very Good	Supporting Strengths-Based Parenting N/A
Exploring Issues and Practice in Family Law	Exploring Issues and Practice in Family Law Very Poor	Exploring Issues and Practice in Family Law Poor	Exploring Issues and Practice in Family Law Satisfactory	Exploring Issues and Practice in Family Law Good	Exploring Issues and Practice in Family Law Very Good	Exploring Issues and Practice in Family Law N/A
Promoting Child Aware Practices	Promoting Child Aware Practices Very Poor	Promoting Child Aware Practices Poor	Promoting Child Aware Practices Satisfactory	Promoting Child Aware Practices Good	Promoting Child Aware Practices Very Good	Promoting Child Aware Practices N/A
Facilitating Post Separation Parenting	Facilitating Post Separation Parenting Very Poor	Facilitating Post Separation Parenting Poor	Facilitating Post Separation Parenting Satisfactory	Facilitating Post Separation Parenting Good	Facilitating Post Separation Parenting Very Good	Facilitating Post Separation Parenting N/A
Targeting the Early Years	Targeting the Early Years Very Poor	Targeting the Early Years Poor	Targeting the Early Years Satisfactory	Targeting the Early Years Good	Targeting the Early Years Very Good	Targeting the Early Years N/A
Exploring Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander services	Exploring Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander services Very Poor	Exploring Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander services Poor	Exploring Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander services Satisfactory	Exploring Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander services Good	Exploring Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander services Very Good	Exploring Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander services N/A
Building the Evidence Base	Building the Evidence Base Very Poor	Building the Evidence Base Poor	Building the Evidence Base Satisfactory	Building the Evidence Base Good	Building the Evidence Base Very Good	Building the Evidence Base N/A

FRSA National Conference 2014: Evaluation

Question Title

* 1. How would you rate your overall experience at the conference?

Question Title

* 2. What is your the main reason for attending this conference?

Question Title

* 3. Please select the best description of your organisation

Question Title

* 4. What is your position in this organisation?

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the relevance of this conference to your work?

Question Title

* 6. Please rate the quality of plenary sessions

Question Title

* 7. Please rate the quality of panel sessions

Question Title

* 8. Please rate the quality of the following events:

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the following:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the quality of the concurrent streams

Question Title

* 11. What did you enjoy the most about the conference?

Question Title

* 12. What did you enjoy the least about the conference?

Question Title

* 13. What would you like to see at next year’s conference?

Question Title

* 14. Please provide the postcode of your main service outlet