CBI Journal Club 2013 - Lola and Muneer (12/2/13) Survey

Question Title

* 1. Name (to be used for tracking submissions only; responses are anonymous)

Question Title

* 2. General presentation skills

	Almost never	Sometimes	Neutral	Occasionally	Almost always
Appeared organized and prepared	Appeared organized and prepared Almost never	Appeared organized and prepared Sometimes	Appeared organized and prepared Neutral	Appeared organized and prepared Occasionally	Appeared organized and prepared Almost always
Spoke loudly and clearly enough	Spoke loudly and clearly enough Almost never	Spoke loudly and clearly enough Sometimes	Spoke loudly and clearly enough Neutral	Spoke loudly and clearly enough Occasionally	Spoke loudly and clearly enough Almost always
Made eye contact with the audience	Made eye contact with the audience Almost never	Made eye contact with the audience Sometimes	Made eye contact with the audience Neutral	Made eye contact with the audience Occasionally	Made eye contact with the audience Almost always
Delivered presentation at an appropriate pace	Delivered presentation at an appropriate pace Almost never	Delivered presentation at an appropriate pace Sometimes	Delivered presentation at an appropriate pace Neutral	Delivered presentation at an appropriate pace Occasionally	Delivered presentation at an appropriate pace Almost always
Effectively engaged the audience	Effectively engaged the audience Almost never	Effectively engaged the audience Sometimes	Effectively engaged the audience Neutral	Effectively engaged the audience Occasionally	Effectively engaged the audience Almost always
Demonstrated thorough knowledge of subject matter	Demonstrated thorough knowledge of subject matter Almost never	Demonstrated thorough knowledge of subject matter Sometimes	Demonstrated thorough knowledge of subject matter Neutral	Demonstrated thorough knowledge of subject matter Occasionally	Demonstrated thorough knowledge of subject matter Almost always

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presentation effectiveness, with regard to

	Almost never effective	Sometimes effective	Neutral	Occasionally effective	Almost always effective
Providing sufficient technical background	Providing sufficient technical background Almost never effective	Providing sufficient technical background Sometimes effective	Providing sufficient technical background Neutral	Providing sufficient technical background Occasionally effective	Providing sufficient technical background Almost always effective
Presenting key results/conclusions	Presenting key results/conclusions Almost never effective	Presenting key results/conclusions Sometimes effective	Presenting key results/conclusions Neutral	Presenting key results/conclusions Occasionally effective	Presenting key results/conclusions Almost always effective
Communicating the impact/application of the discovery/technology	Communicating the impact/application of the discovery/technology Almost never effective	Communicating the impact/application of the discovery/technology Sometimes effective	Communicating the impact/application of the discovery/technology Neutral	Communicating the impact/application of the discovery/technology Occasionally effective	Communicating the impact/application of the discovery/technology Almost always effective
Making connections between the work and research labs on campus	Making connections between the work and research labs on campus Almost never effective	Making connections between the work and research labs on campus Sometimes effective	Making connections between the work and research labs on campus Neutral	Making connections between the work and research labs on campus Occasionally effective	Making connections between the work and research labs on campus Almost always effective
Moderating discussion	Moderating discussion Almost never effective	Moderating discussion Sometimes effective	Moderating discussion Neutral	Moderating discussion Occasionally effective	Moderating discussion Almost always effective
Time management (sticking to allotted time)	Time management (sticking to allotted time) Almost never effective	Time management (sticking to allotted time) Sometimes effective	Time management (sticking to allotted time) Neutral	Time management (sticking to allotted time) Occasionally effective	Time management (sticking to allotted time) Almost always effective
Communicating to life scientists	Communicating to life scientists Almost never effective	Communicating to life scientists Sometimes effective	Communicating to life scientists Neutral	Communicating to life scientists Occasionally effective	Communicating to life scientists Almost always effective
Communicating to chemists & engineers/physical scientists	Communicating to chemists & engineers/physical scientists Almost never effective	Communicating to chemists & engineers/physical scientists Sometimes effective	Communicating to chemists & engineers/physical scientists Neutral	Communicating to chemists & engineers/physical scientists Occasionally effective	Communicating to chemists & engineers/physical scientists Almost always effective

Question Title

* 4. Has this presentation sparked interdisciplinary ideas, such as:

Applying a new research technique or strategy to your thesis project

Seeking training on a particular technique from another lab on campus

Seeking access to equipment or facilities in another lab on campus

Initiating a new research collaboration

None of the above

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 5. What did you like the best about this presentation?

Question Title

* 6. What did you like the least about this presentation? Do you have any comments or
suggestions that might help him/her improve future presentations?

Question Title

* 7. Please indicate which strategies were used to promote discussion and how well they worked.

	worked very well	worked OK	worked poorly	not used
Presenter asked the class discussion questions	Presenter asked the class discussion questions worked very well	Presenter asked the class discussion questions worked OK	Presenter asked the class discussion questions worked poorly	Presenter asked the class discussion questions not used
Two people were appointed to prepare questions and discussion topics	Two people were appointed to prepare questions and discussion topics worked very well	Two people were appointed to prepare questions and discussion topics worked OK	Two people were appointed to prepare questions and discussion topics worked poorly	Two people were appointed to prepare questions and discussion topics not used
Class divided in half to articulate pros and cons of the work	Class divided in half to articulate pros and cons of the work worked very well	Class divided in half to articulate pros and cons of the work worked OK	Class divided in half to articulate pros and cons of the work worked poorly	Class divided in half to articulate pros and cons of the work not used

Question Title

* 1. Name (to be used for tracking submissions only; responses are anonymous)

Question Title

* 2. General presentation skills

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presentation effectiveness, with regard to

Question Title

* 4. Has this presentation sparked interdisciplinary ideas, such as:

Question Title

* 5. What did you like the best about this presentation?

Question Title

* 6. What did you like the least about this presentation? Do you have any comments orsuggestions that might help him/her improve future presentations?

Question Title

* 7. Please indicate which strategies were used to promote discussion and how well they worked.

Question Title

* 8. Provide reasons why promoting discussion was effective or not.

* 6. What did you like the least about this presentation? Do you have any comments or
suggestions that might help him/her improve future presentations?