2013 SAEM Annual Meeting Overall Evaluation

1. Overall Evaluation

 
1. What is your primary specialty?
2. What is your level of training?
3. Overall evaluation of the activity:
4. Quality of the educational content:
5. Was the activity responsive to your needs?
6. Was the activity relevant to your practice?
7. Did this activity increase your knowledge and/or skills in delivering patient care?
8. Were the following objectives met?
YesNo
Apply both education and research findings to your emergency medicine practice
Apply key statistical indicators in analyzing research results
Utilize acceptable research methods and study design in the development of research projects
Realize the details of the framework for EBM so that intended practice improvements are vetted through this prism
9. In your opinion, were any presenters biased in their discussion of any commercial products or services?
10. How will you change your clinical practice as a result of this activity?
11. Which topics or lecturers were the most useful?
12. Which topics or lecturers were the least useful?
13. Please suggest other topics that should be covered in future activities.
14. Please evaluate the amount of social activities and networking opportunities (opening reception, coffee breaks, banquet, wine reception)
15. What would you like to see more of?
16. Should the wine and cheese poster session be included in future Annual Meetings?
17. Do you prefer having an open lunch hour at the expense of less didactic programming time at the meeting?
18. Do you prefer no sessions being scheduled at the same time (competing) as poster presentations?
19. Was the organization of "tracks" helpful in guiding your experience and interest in the meeting?
20. Please evaluate the:
More time for researchJust rightMore time for didacticsunsure
Balance between research and didactic programming
21. Please evaluate the:
ExcellentVery SatisfactorySatisfactorySomewhat SatisfactoryNot SatisfactoryDid Not Attend
Innovations in Emergency Medicine Education Exhibits
22. Please evaluate the:
ExcellentVery SatisfactorySatisfactorySomewhat SatisfactoryNot SatisfactoryDid Not Attend
Oral Papers
23. Please evaluate the:
ExcellentVery SatisfactorySatisfactorySomewhat SatisfactoryNot SatisfactoryDid Not Attend
Moderated Papers
24. Please evaluate the:
ExcellentVery SatisfactorySatisfactorySomewhat SatisfactoryNot SatisfactoryDid Not Attend
Poster Presentations
25. Please evaluate the:
ExcellentVery SatisfactorySatisfactorySomewhat SatisfactoryNot SatisfactoryDid Not Attend
CPC
26. Please evaluate the:
ExcellentVery SatisfactorySatisfactorySomewhat SatisfactoryNot SatisfactoryDid Not Attend
Photo Displays
27. Keynote Speaker
Very ImportantImportantNeutralUnimportantVery Unimportant
How important is a keynote speaker to you?
28. Suggestions for future keynote speakers:
29. What electronic formats or enhancements would you like to see at the meeting? (Check all that Apply)
30. Please evaluate:
ExcellentVery SatisfactorySatisfactorySomewhat SatisfactoryNot SatisfactoryDid Not Submit paper for this meeting
This year's system for abstract submission
31. Please evaluate:
ExcellentVery SatisfactorySatisfactorySomewhat SatisfactoryNot SatisfactoryN/A
What did you think of the ability to download a program itinerary to your phone/PDA?
32. Recognizing that exhibitors bring revenue to the meeting and Society:
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
How do you feel about the integration of exhibits into the Annual Meeting?
33. Other comments or suggestions: