Skip to content
2013 SAEM Annual Meeting Overall Evaluation
2.
Overall Evaluation
1.
What is your primary specialty?
Emergency Medicine
Pediatric Emergency Medicine
Family Medicine
Internal Medicine
Surgery
Anesthesia
Other (please specify)
2.
What is your level of training?
Attending
Professor
Associate Professor
Assistant Professor
Instructor
Fellow
Resident
Nurse
Nurse Practitioner/Physician Assistant
Medical Student
Other (please specify)
3.
Overall evaluation of the activity:
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
4.
Quality of the educational content:
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
5.
Was the activity responsive to your needs?
Yes
No
6.
Was the activity relevant to your practice?
Yes
No
Comments:
7.
Did this activity increase your knowledge and/or skills in delivering patient care?
Yes
No
8.
Were the following objectives met?
Yes
No
Apply both education and research findings to your emergency medicine practice
Yes
No
Apply key statistical indicators in analyzing research results
Yes
No
Utilize acceptable research methods and study design in the development of research projects
Yes
No
Realize the details of the framework for EBM so that intended practice improvements are vetted through this prism
Yes
No
9.
In your opinion, were any presenters biased in their discussion of any commercial products or services?
No
Yes (please elaborate)
10.
How will you change your clinical practice as a result of this activity?
11.
Which topics or lecturers were the most useful?
12.
Which topics or lecturers were the least useful?
13.
Please suggest other topics that should be covered in future activities.
14.
Please evaluate the amount of social activities and networking opportunities (opening reception, coffee breaks, banquet, wine reception)
Too few
Just right
Too many
Did not attend
15.
What would you like to see more of?
16.
Should the wine and cheese poster session be included in future Annual Meetings?
Yes
No
Did not Attend
Comments:
17.
Do you prefer having an open lunch hour at the expense of less didactic programming time at the meeting?
Yes
No
18.
Do you prefer no sessions being scheduled at the same time (competing) as poster presentations?
Yes
No
19.
Was the organization of "tracks" helpful in guiding your experience and interest in the meeting?
Yes
No
How could some of these tracks be better developed?
20.
Please evaluate the:
More time for research
Just right
More time for didactics
unsure
Balance between research and didactic programming
More time for research
Just right
More time for didactics
unsure
Comments:
21.
Please evaluate the:
Excellent
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Somewhat Satisfactory
Not Satisfactory
Did Not Attend
Innovations in Emergency Medicine Education Exhibits
Excellent
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Somewhat Satisfactory
Not Satisfactory
Did Not Attend
Comments:
22.
Please evaluate the:
Excellent
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Somewhat Satisfactory
Not Satisfactory
Did Not Attend
Oral Papers
Excellent
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Somewhat Satisfactory
Not Satisfactory
Did Not Attend
Comments:
23.
Please evaluate the:
Excellent
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Somewhat Satisfactory
Not Satisfactory
Did Not Attend
Moderated Papers
Excellent
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Somewhat Satisfactory
Not Satisfactory
Did Not Attend
Comments:
24.
Please evaluate the:
Excellent
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Somewhat Satisfactory
Not Satisfactory
Did Not Attend
Poster Presentations
Excellent
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Somewhat Satisfactory
Not Satisfactory
Did Not Attend
Comments:
25.
Please evaluate the:
Excellent
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Somewhat Satisfactory
Not Satisfactory
Did Not Attend
CPC
Excellent
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Somewhat Satisfactory
Not Satisfactory
Did Not Attend
Comments:
26.
Please evaluate the:
Excellent
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Somewhat Satisfactory
Not Satisfactory
Did Not Attend
Photo Displays
Excellent
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Somewhat Satisfactory
Not Satisfactory
Did Not Attend
Comments:
27.
Keynote Speaker
Very Important
Important
Neutral
Unimportant
Very Unimportant
How important is a keynote speaker to you?
Very Important
Important
Neutral
Unimportant
Very Unimportant
If there were no scheduled keynote speaker, how would you like to see this time used?
28.
Suggestions for future keynote speakers:
29.
What electronic formats or enhancements would you like to see at the meeting? (Check all that Apply)
Podcasts/webcasts/webinars
Interactive Electronic Media
Other (please specify)
30.
Please evaluate:
Excellent
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Somewhat Satisfactory
Not Satisfactory
Did Not Submit paper for this meeting
This year's system for abstract submission
Excellent
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Somewhat Satisfactory
Not Satisfactory
Did Not Submit paper for this meeting
Comments:
31.
Please evaluate:
Excellent
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Somewhat Satisfactory
Not Satisfactory
N/A
What did you think of the ability to download a program itinerary to your phone/PDA?
Excellent
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Somewhat Satisfactory
Not Satisfactory
N/A
Comments:
32.
Recognizing that exhibitors bring revenue to the meeting and Society:
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
How do you feel about the integration of exhibits into the Annual Meeting?
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Which types of exhibitors are you comfortable with? Which are you opposed to?
33.
Other comments or suggestions:
