Exit this survey LONDON IC47 - Overview of phakic IOLs Question Title * 1. Participant Name: Question Title * 2. Professional Situation: Resident University Hospital Staff Ophthalmic Assistant Private Practice Industry Question Title * 3. What was your main reason for choosing this course? Interesting Topic Good Faculty Well-known Course Director Question Title * 4. How did you rate the content of this course? (1 = poor, 5 = excellent) 1 2 3 4 5 Question Title * 5. How useful was the course for your clinical practice? (1 = poor, 5 = excellent) 1 2 3 4 5 Question Title * 6. Did all listed faculty members attend this course? Yes No Question Title * 7. Was the course free from commercial bias? Yes No If no, what was the bias? Question Title * 8. Do you have any suggestions to improve the presentations in this course? Question Title * 9. How did you rate the quality of the speakers in this course? (1 = poor, 5 = excellent) 1 2 3 4 5 A. Marinho A. Marinho 1 A. Marinho 2 A. Marinho 3 A. Marinho 4 A. Marinho 5 M. Knorz M. Knorz 1 M. Knorz 2 M. Knorz 3 M. Knorz 4 M. Knorz 5 C. Budo C. Budo 1 C. Budo 2 C. Budo 3 C. Budo 4 C. Budo 5 M. Remy M. Remy 1 M. Remy 2 M. Remy 3 M. Remy 4 M. Remy 5 A. El Danasoury A. El Danasoury 1 A. El Danasoury 2 A. El Danasoury 3 A. El Danasoury 4 A. El Danasoury 5 G. Baikoff G. Baikoff 1 G. Baikoff 2 G. Baikoff 3 G. Baikoff 4 G. Baikoff 5 Question Title * 10. How did you rate the standard of English of the speakers in this course? (1 = poor, 5 = excellent) 1 2 3 4 5 A. Marinho A. Marinho 1 A. Marinho 2 A. Marinho 3 A. Marinho 4 A. Marinho 5 M. Knorz M. Knorz 1 M. Knorz 2 M. Knorz 3 M. Knorz 4 M. Knorz 5 C. Budo C. Budo 1 C. Budo 2 C. Budo 3 C. Budo 4 C. Budo 5 M. Remy M. Remy 1 M. Remy 2 M. Remy 3 M. Remy 4 M. Remy 5 A. El Danasoury A. El Danasoury 1 A. El Danasoury 2 A. El Danasoury 3 A. El Danasoury 4 A. El Danasoury 5 G. Baikoff G. Baikoff 1 G. Baikoff 2 G. Baikoff 3 G. Baikoff 4 G. Baikoff 5 Question Title * 11. General Comments and Suggestions: Done