2013 SAEM AM Didactic - DS009 1. The Current State of Critical Care Fellowship Training for Emergency Medicine Residency Graduates. Question Title * 1. Goals/Objectives of session were clear and accomplished. Yes No Question Title * 2. Speakers were knowledgeable with teaching skills that were appropriate for the subject. Yes No Question Title * 3. Probability of changing practice due to these presentations? High Low No Change Necessary ------------> ------------> High ------------> Low ------------> No Change Necessary What would you change or consider changing? Question Title * 4. Kevin Ferguson, MD Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Not Applicable Delivery Delivery Excellent Delivery Very Good Delivery Good Delivery Fair Delivery Poor Delivery Not Applicable Content Content Excellent Content Very Good Content Good Content Fair Content Poor Content Not Applicable Syllabus/Handouts Syllabus/Handouts Excellent Syllabus/Handouts Very Good Syllabus/Handouts Good Syllabus/Handouts Fair Syllabus/Handouts Poor Syllabus/Handouts Not Applicable Practical Value Practical Value Excellent Practical Value Very Good Practical Value Good Practical Value Fair Practical Value Poor Practical Value Not Applicable Question Title * 5. Was there bias in this presentation? No Yes (please specify) Question Title * 6. Comments for Kevin Ferguson, MD Question Title * 7. Andrea Gabrielli, MD Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Not Applicable Delivery Delivery Excellent Delivery Very Good Delivery Good Delivery Fair Delivery Poor Delivery Not Applicable Content Content Excellent Content Very Good Content Good Content Fair Content Poor Content Not Applicable Syllabus/Handouts Syllabus/Handouts Excellent Syllabus/Handouts Very Good Syllabus/Handouts Good Syllabus/Handouts Fair Syllabus/Handouts Poor Syllabus/Handouts Not Applicable Practical Value Practical Value Excellent Practical Value Very Good Practical Value Good Practical Value Fair Practical Value Poor Practical Value Not Applicable Question Title * 8. Was there bias in this presentation? No Yes (please specify) Question Title * 9. Comments for Andrea Gabrielli, MD Question Title * 10. Jay Menaker, MD Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Not Applicable Delivery Delivery Excellent Delivery Very Good Delivery Good Delivery Fair Delivery Poor Delivery Not Applicable Content Content Excellent Content Very Good Content Good Content Fair Content Poor Content Not Applicable Syllabus/Handouts Syllabus/Handouts Excellent Syllabus/Handouts Very Good Syllabus/Handouts Good Syllabus/Handouts Fair Syllabus/Handouts Poor Syllabus/Handouts Not Applicable Practical Value Practical Value Excellent Practical Value Very Good Practical Value Good Practical Value Fair Practical Value Poor Practical Value Not Applicable Question Title * 11. Was there bias in this presentation? No Yes (please specify) Question Title * 12. Comments for Jay Menaker, MD Question Title * 13. Mike Winters, MD Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Not Applicable Delivery Delivery Excellent Delivery Very Good Delivery Good Delivery Fair Delivery Poor Delivery Not Applicable Content Content Excellent Content Very Good Content Good Content Fair Content Poor Content Not Applicable Syllabus/Handouts Syllabus/Handouts Excellent Syllabus/Handouts Very Good Syllabus/Handouts Good Syllabus/Handouts Fair Syllabus/Handouts Poor Syllabus/Handouts Not Applicable Practical Value Practical Value Excellent Practical Value Very Good Practical Value Good Practical Value Fair Practical Value Poor Practical Value Not Applicable Question Title * 14. Was there bias in this presentation? No Yes (please specify) Question Title * 15. Comments for Mike Winters, MD Done
