Exit this survey (S) City-Wide Emergency Grand Rounds Evaluation March 8, 2011 1. Please select 1 choice Question Title * 1. "M&M Rounds: Low Risk Chest Pain" - Dr. Caroline Kowal Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Was consistent with objectives Was consistent with objectives Strongly Disagree Was consistent with objectives Disagree Was consistent with objectives Neutral Was consistent with objectives Agree Was consistent with objectives Strongly Agree Info was presented clearly Info was presented clearly Strongly Disagree Info was presented clearly Disagree Info was presented clearly Neutral Info was presented clearly Agree Info was presented clearly Strongly Agree Info was relevant to practice Info was relevant to practice Strongly Disagree Info was relevant to practice Disagree Info was relevant to practice Neutral Info was relevant to practice Agree Info was relevant to practice Strongly Agree Discussion time was adequate Discussion time was adequate Strongly Disagree Discussion time was adequate Disagree Discussion time was adequate Neutral Discussion time was adequate Agree Discussion time was adequate Strongly Agree Question Title * 2. Comments Question Title * 3. "M&M Rounds: Low Risk Chest Pain" - Dr. Eric Smith Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Was consistent with objectives Was consistent with objectives Strongly Disagree Was consistent with objectives Disagree Was consistent with objectives Neutral Was consistent with objectives Agree Was consistent with objectives Strongly Agree Info was presented clearly Info was presented clearly Strongly Disagree Info was presented clearly Disagree Info was presented clearly Neutral Info was presented clearly Agree Info was presented clearly Strongly Agree Info was relevant to practice Info was relevant to practice Strongly Disagree Info was relevant to practice Disagree Info was relevant to practice Neutral Info was relevant to practice Agree Info was relevant to practice Strongly Agree Discussion time was adequate Discussion time was adequate Strongly Disagree Discussion time was adequate Disagree Discussion time was adequate Neutral Discussion time was adequate Agree Discussion time was adequate Strongly Agree Question Title * 4. Comments Question Title * 5. “Fainting Themes and Scoring Schemes” - Dr. Creighton Hui Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Was consistent with objectives Was consistent with objectives Strongly Disagree Was consistent with objectives Disagree Was consistent with objectives Neutral Was consistent with objectives Agree Was consistent with objectives Strongly Agree Info was presented clearly Info was presented clearly Strongly Disagree Info was presented clearly Disagree Info was presented clearly Neutral Info was presented clearly Agree Info was presented clearly Strongly Agree Info was relevant to practice Info was relevant to practice Strongly Disagree Info was relevant to practice Disagree Info was relevant to practice Neutral Info was relevant to practice Agree Info was relevant to practice Strongly Agree Discussion time was adequate Discussion time was adequate Strongly Disagree Discussion time was adequate Disagree Discussion time was adequate Neutral Discussion time was adequate Agree Discussion time was adequate Strongly Agree Question Title * 6. Comments Question Title * 7. How did you attend Rounds? Live in person Live on the internet At a later time on the internet Question Title * 8. PLEASE TURN OVER AND ANSWER REVERSE PAGE Question Title * 9. If attended in person, would you say the catering was tasty, satisfying and nutritional? No Neutral Yes Suggestions/Comments Question Title * 10. Name and Location (optional) *** Mandatory in order to qualify for M1 credits if viewing on-line. Done
