Exit this survey Emergency Grand Rounds - Dec 6/11 1. Please select 1 choice Question Title * 1. The Difficult Patient - Dr. Stewart Wakeman, FRCPC; Director, Shared Mental Health Care Program, WRHA Mental Health Program Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Was consistent with objectives Was consistent with objectives Strongly Disagree Was consistent with objectives Disagree Was consistent with objectives Neutral Was consistent with objectives Agree Was consistent with objectives Strongly Agree Info was presented clearly Info was presented clearly Strongly Disagree Info was presented clearly Disagree Info was presented clearly Neutral Info was presented clearly Agree Info was presented clearly Strongly Agree Info was relevant to practice Info was relevant to practice Strongly Disagree Info was relevant to practice Disagree Info was relevant to practice Neutral Info was relevant to practice Agree Info was relevant to practice Strongly Agree Discussion time was adequate Discussion time was adequate Strongly Disagree Discussion time was adequate Disagree Discussion time was adequate Neutral Discussion time was adequate Agree Discussion time was adequate Strongly Agree Question Title * 2. Comments Question Title * 3. The Cutting Edge: New EM Procedures to Impress Your Colleagues - Dr. Joe Bednarczyk, FRCP Resident Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Was consistent with objectives Was consistent with objectives Strongly Disagree Was consistent with objectives Disagree Was consistent with objectives Neutral Was consistent with objectives Agree Was consistent with objectives Strongly Agree Info was presented clearly Info was presented clearly Strongly Disagree Info was presented clearly Disagree Info was presented clearly Neutral Info was presented clearly Agree Info was presented clearly Strongly Agree Info was relevant to practice Info was relevant to practice Strongly Disagree Info was relevant to practice Disagree Info was relevant to practice Neutral Info was relevant to practice Agree Info was relevant to practice Strongly Agree Discussion time was adequate Discussion time was adequate Strongly Disagree Discussion time was adequate Disagree Discussion time was adequate Neutral Discussion time was adequate Agree Discussion time was adequate Strongly Agree Question Title * 4. Comments Question Title * 5. "Oral anticoagulants, new and old - management of thrombosis and of bleeding complications" - Dr. Don Houston, CancerCare MB Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Was consistent with objectives Was consistent with objectives Strongly Disagree Was consistent with objectives Disagree Was consistent with objectives Neutral Was consistent with objectives Agree Was consistent with objectives Strongly Agree Info was presented clearly Info was presented clearly Strongly Disagree Info was presented clearly Disagree Info was presented clearly Neutral Info was presented clearly Agree Info was presented clearly Strongly Agree Info was relevant to practice Info was relevant to practice Strongly Disagree Info was relevant to practice Disagree Info was relevant to practice Neutral Info was relevant to practice Agree Info was relevant to practice Strongly Agree Discussion time was adequate Discussion time was adequate Strongly Disagree Discussion time was adequate Disagree Discussion time was adequate Neutral Discussion time was adequate Agree Discussion time was adequate Strongly Agree Question Title * 6. Comments Question Title * 7. "Oral anticoagulants, new and old - management of thrombosis and of bleeding complications" - Dr. Peter Thomson, WRHA Medicine Program Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Was consistent with objectives Was consistent with objectives Strongly Disagree Was consistent with objectives Disagree Was consistent with objectives Neutral Was consistent with objectives Agree Was consistent with objectives Strongly Agree Info was presented clearly Info was presented clearly Strongly Disagree Info was presented clearly Disagree Info was presented clearly Neutral Info was presented clearly Agree Info was presented clearly Strongly Agree Info was relevant to practice Info was relevant to practice Strongly Disagree Info was relevant to practice Disagree Info was relevant to practice Neutral Info was relevant to practice Agree Info was relevant to practice Strongly Agree Discussion time was adequate Discussion time was adequate Strongly Disagree Discussion time was adequate Disagree Discussion time was adequate Neutral Discussion time was adequate Agree Discussion time was adequate Strongly Agree Question Title * 8. Comments Question Title * 9. How did you attend Rounds? Live in person at St. B Live on the SBRC.TV At a later time on the internet Question Title * 10. Name and Location (optional) *** Mandatory in order to qualify for M1 credits if viewing on-line. Done
