2013 SAEM AM Didactic - DS004 1. Development of Clinical Decision Instruments in Emergency Medicine Question Title * 1. Goals/Objectives of session were clear and accomplished. Yes No Question Title * 2. Speakers were knowledgeable with teaching skills that were appropriate for the subject. Yes No Question Title * 3. Probability of changing practice due to these presentations? High Low No Change Necessary ------------> ------------> High ------------> Low ------------> No Change Necessary What would you change or consider changing? Question Title * 4. Robert Rodriguez, MD Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Not Applicable Delivery Delivery Excellent Delivery Very Good Delivery Good Delivery Fair Delivery Poor Delivery Not Applicable Content Content Excellent Content Very Good Content Good Content Fair Content Poor Content Not Applicable Syllabus/Handouts Syllabus/Handouts Excellent Syllabus/Handouts Very Good Syllabus/Handouts Good Syllabus/Handouts Fair Syllabus/Handouts Poor Syllabus/Handouts Not Applicable Practical Value Practical Value Excellent Practical Value Very Good Practical Value Good Practical Value Fair Practical Value Poor Practical Value Not Applicable Question Title * 5. Was there bias in this presentation? No Yes (please specify) Question Title * 6. Robert Rodriguez, MD Question Title * 7. James Holmes, MD Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Not Applicable Delivery Delivery Excellent Delivery Very Good Delivery Good Delivery Fair Delivery Poor Delivery Not Applicable Content Content Excellent Content Very Good Content Good Content Fair Content Poor Content Not Applicable Syllabus/Handouts Syllabus/Handouts Excellent Syllabus/Handouts Very Good Syllabus/Handouts Good Syllabus/Handouts Fair Syllabus/Handouts Poor Syllabus/Handouts Not Applicable Practical Value Practical Value Excellent Practical Value Very Good Practical Value Good Practical Value Fair Practical Value Poor Practical Value Not Applicable Question Title * 8. Was there bias in this presentation? No Yes (please specify) Question Title * 9. Comments for James Holmes, MD Question Title * 10. Nate Kuppermann, MD, PhD Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Not Applicable Delivery Delivery Excellent Delivery Very Good Delivery Good Delivery Fair Delivery Poor Delivery Not Applicable Content Content Excellent Content Very Good Content Good Content Fair Content Poor Content Not Applicable Syllabus/Handouts Syllabus/Handouts Excellent Syllabus/Handouts Very Good Syllabus/Handouts Good Syllabus/Handouts Fair Syllabus/Handouts Poor Syllabus/Handouts Not Applicable Practical Value Practical Value Excellent Practical Value Very Good Practical Value Good Practical Value Fair Practical Value Poor Practical Value Not Applicable Question Title * 11. Was there bias in this presentation? No Yes (please specify) Question Title * 12. Comments for Nate Kuppermann, MD, PhD Question Title * 13. William Mower, MD, PhD Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Not Applicable Delivery Delivery Excellent Delivery Very Good Delivery Good Delivery Fair Delivery Poor Delivery Not Applicable Content Content Excellent Content Very Good Content Good Content Fair Content Poor Content Not Applicable Syllabus/Handouts Syllabus/Handouts Excellent Syllabus/Handouts Very Good Syllabus/Handouts Good Syllabus/Handouts Fair Syllabus/Handouts Poor Syllabus/Handouts Not Applicable Practical Value Practical Value Excellent Practical Value Very Good Practical Value Good Practical Value Fair Practical Value Poor Practical Value Not Applicable Question Title * 14. Was there bias in this presentation? No Yes (please specify) Question Title * 15. Comments for William Mower, MD, PhD Done
