ACOG District II : 2014 Annual Meeting Evaluation

Lecture Evaluation - Saturday, October 18, 2014

Please rate the following presenters based upon the quality of their materials and presentation skills.

Question Title

* 1. Wendy L. Kinzler, MD, FACOG
Diagnosis and Evaluation of Early Pregnancy Loss

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 2. Sarah J. Betstadt, MD, MPH, FACOG
Contraception for the Medically Complex Patient

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 3. Zachary N. Stowe, MD
Depression in Pregnancy

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 4. Jeanne Conry, MD, PhD, FACOG
Every Woman, Every Time

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 5. Richard N. Waldman, MD, FACOG
Collaborative Intelligence (PANEL)

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 6. Elaine Mielcarski, CNM, MS, NP, FACNM
Collaborative Intelligence (PANEL)

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 7. Robert K. Silverman, MD, FACOG
Obesity in OB/GYN (PANEL)

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 8. Ellen Landsberger, MD, FACOG
Obesity in OB/GYN (PANEL)

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 9. Loralei L. Thornburg, MD, FACOG
Obesity in OB/GYN (PANEL)

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 10. Carolyn Westhoff, MD, M.Sc., FACOG
Obesity in OB/GYN (PANEL)

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 11. David L. Gandell, MD, FACOG
Female Sexual Dysfunction, Decreased Libido, and Sexual Disorders

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 12. Daniel L. Clarke-Pearson, MD, FACOG
Morcellation of Presumed Fibroids: A Decision Analysis

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)