ACOG District II : 2014 Annual Meeting Evaluation

Lecture Evaluation - Friday, October 17, 2014

Please rate the following presenters based upon the quality of their materials and presentation skills.

Question Title

* 1. Michael Snyder, MD
Personalized Medicine: Personal Omics Profiling of Healthy and Disease States

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 2. William J. Mann, Jr., MD, FACOG
Avoidance, Recognition, and Management of Surgical Complications

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained information relevant to my practice	Contained information relevant to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained information relevant to my practice 2	Contained information relevant to my practice 3	Contained information relevant to my practice 4	Contained information relevant to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 3. Loralei L. Thornburg, MD, FACOG
When to (Still) Use Magnesium Sulfate in Obstetrics

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 4. Nerys Benfield, MD, MPH, FACOG
Controversies in Contraception: Separating Fact from Fiction

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 5. Paul A. DiSilvestro, MD, FACOG
HPV Screening in Cervical Cancer Prevention: Do Women Still Need Pap Smears? (PANEL)

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 6. Jason D. Wright, MD, FACOG
HPV Screening in Cervical Cancer Prevention: Do Women Still Need Pap Smears? (PANEL)

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 7. Charles J. Lockwood, MD, MHCM, FACOG
Pathogenesis of Prematurity

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 8. Michael T. Mennuti, MD, FACOG
How Much Information about the Fetus Will Be Too Much?

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 9. Catherine Y. Spong MD, FACOG
Preventing the First Cesarean

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)

Question Title

* 10. Arnold P. Advincula, MD, FACOG
Controversies in Robotics vs. Laparoscopic Surgery

	1 (poor)	2	3	4	5 (excellent)
Based on available science	Based on available science 1 (poor)	Based on available science 2	Based on available science 3	Based on available science 4	Based on available science 5 (excellent)
Well-organized	Well-organized 1 (poor)	Well-organized 2	Well-organized 3	Well-organized 4	Well-organized 5 (excellent)
Met expectations for learning	Met expectations for learning 1 (poor)	Met expectations for learning 2	Met expectations for learning 3	Met expectations for learning 4	Met expectations for learning 5 (excellent)
Contained informaiton relative to my practice	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 1 (poor)	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 2	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 3	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 4	Contained informaiton relative to my practice 5 (excellent)
Audiovisual	Audiovisual 1 (poor)	Audiovisual 2	Audiovisual 3	Audiovisual 4	Audiovisual 5 (excellent)
Syllabus	Syllabus 1 (poor)	Syllabus 2	Syllabus 3	Syllabus 4	Syllabus 5 (excellent)
Overall lecture grade	Overall lecture grade 1 (poor)	Overall lecture grade 2	Overall lecture grade 3	Overall lecture grade 4	Overall lecture grade 5 (excellent)