2015 Pathologists’ Assistants Program - Overall Evaluation

OVERALL CONFERENCE EVALUATION

Objectives:
At the end of the session participants will be able to

1. Evaluate and validate different educational tools in residency training for learning and assessment
2. Identify new findings and techniques in Pathology diagnosis impacting on prognostication and patient care
3. Identify new biomarkers or molecular signatures as tools for diagnosis and or prognosis
4. Assess the significance of new findings and observations in the context of current literature

Question Title

* 1. Please type your first and last name below. To obtain CME/CPD, you must fill out an evaluation for each educational event attended. Filling in the field below will ensure you receive credit for completing this evaluation. Evaluations remain confidential and anonymous - The field is randomized and deleted when CME/CPD is claimed.

Name:

Question Title

* 2. How would you rate the 2014 Annual Pathologists’ Assistants Program?

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Question Title

* 3. Indicate how important each of the following was in your decision to attend this year’s meeting.

	Very Important	Somewhat Important	Not Important	N/A
Educational Sessions	Educational Sessions Very Important	Educational Sessions Somewhat Important	Educational Sessions Not Important	Educational Sessions N/A
Networking	Networking Very Important	Networking Somewhat Important	Networking Not Important	Networking N/A
Career Opportunities	Career Opportunities Very Important	Career Opportunities Somewhat Important	Career Opportunities Not Important	Career Opportunities N/A
Hands On Workshops	Hands On Workshops Very Important	Hands On Workshops Somewhat Important	Hands On Workshops Not Important	Hands On Workshops N/A
Meeting Destination: Toronto, ON	Meeting Destination: Toronto, ON Very Important	Meeting Destination: Toronto, ON Somewhat Important	Meeting Destination: Toronto, ON Not Important	Meeting Destination: Toronto, ON N/A

Question Title

* 4. Overall, rate the following features of the Annual Meeting.

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Workshops	Workshops Excellent	Workshops Good	Workshops Fair	Workshops Poor	Workshops N/A
Hands On Workshops	Hands On Workshops Excellent	Hands On Workshops Good	Hands On Workshops Fair	Hands On Workshops Poor	Hands On Workshops N/A
Poster Presentations	Poster Presentations Excellent	Poster Presentations Good	Poster Presentations Fair	Poster Presentations Poor	Poster Presentations N/A

Question Title

* 5. Rate the following logistical components.

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Location: Le Westin Montreal	Location: Le Westin Montreal Excellent	Location: Le Westin Montreal Good	Location: Le Westin Montreal Fair	Location: Le Westin Montreal Poor	Location: Le Westin Montreal N/A
Hotel Facility	Hotel Facility Excellent	Hotel Facility Good	Hotel Facility Fair	Hotel Facility Poor	Hotel Facility N/A
Pre-Registration	Pre-Registration Excellent	Pre-Registration Good	Pre-Registration Fair	Pre-Registration Poor	Pre-Registration N/A
On-Site Registration	On-Site Registration Excellent	On-Site Registration Good	On-Site Registration Fair	On-Site Registration Poor	On-Site Registration N/A
Hours of Conference	Hours of Conference Excellent	Hours of Conference Good	Hours of Conference Fair	Hours of Conference Poor	Hours of Conference N/A
Meals / Refreshments	Meals / Refreshments Excellent	Meals / Refreshments Good	Meals / Refreshments Fair	Meals / Refreshments Poor	Meals / Refreshments N/A
CAP-ACP Staff	CAP-ACP Staff Excellent	CAP-ACP Staff Good	CAP-ACP Staff Fair	CAP-ACP Staff Poor	CAP-ACP Staff N/A

Question Title

Question Title

* 2. How would you rate the 2014 Annual Pathologists’ Assistants Program?

Question Title

* 3. Indicate how important each of the following was in your decision to attend this year’s meeting.

Question Title

* 4. Overall, rate the following features of the Annual Meeting.

Question Title

* 5. Rate the following logistical components.

Question Title

* 6. Comments and Suggestions.