AFHTO 2013 Conference Evaluation Question Title * CONFERENCE PROGRAM OVERALL Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree The program content was relevant to family health teams. The program content was relevant to family health teams. Strongly Disagree The program content was relevant to family health teams. Disagree The program content was relevant to family health teams. Agree The program content was relevant to family health teams. Strongly Agree Provided a valuable opportunity to share and learn about innovations, best practices and research findings to improve care and value in FHTs. Provided a valuable opportunity to share and learn about innovations, best practices and research findings to improve care and value in FHTs. Strongly Disagree Provided a valuable opportunity to share and learn about innovations, best practices and research findings to improve care and value in FHTs. Disagree Provided a valuable opportunity to share and learn about innovations, best practices and research findings to improve care and value in FHTs. Agree Provided a valuable opportunity to share and learn about innovations, best practices and research findings to improve care and value in FHTs. Strongly Agree Enabled me to strengthen my professional network. Enabled me to strengthen my professional network. Strongly Disagree Enabled me to strengthen my professional network. Disagree Enabled me to strengthen my professional network. Agree Enabled me to strengthen my professional network. Strongly Agree What I learned and experienced will be useful in my future practice. What I learned and experienced will be useful in my future practice. Strongly Disagree What I learned and experienced will be useful in my future practice. Disagree What I learned and experienced will be useful in my future practice. Agree What I learned and experienced will be useful in my future practice. Strongly Agree Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest was clearly communicated. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest was clearly communicated. Strongly Disagree Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest was clearly communicated. Disagree Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest was clearly communicated. Agree Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest was clearly communicated. Strongly Agree Question Title * PROGRAM COMPONENTS Tuesday, October 22, 2013 Professional Networking Session (9:00 AM - 12:30 PM): Please identify the session you attended FHT Leadership Session Administrative Staff (assistants / receptionists / medical secretaries) Health Promoter Mental Health Interest Group Nurse (RN / RPN) Nurse Practitioner Occupational Therapist Pharmacist Physician Registered Dietitian Respiratory Therapist Question Title * For professional networking, please rate the extent to which the session: Poor Satisfactory Good Very good Did not attend Had relevance for your work Had relevance for your work Poor Had relevance for your work Satisfactory Had relevance for your work Good Had relevance for your work Very good Had relevance for your work Did not attend Captured and maintained your interest Captured and maintained your interest Poor Captured and maintained your interest Satisfactory Captured and maintained your interest Good Captured and maintained your interest Very good Captured and maintained your interest Did not attend Had potential impact for your FHT Had potential impact for your FHT Poor Had potential impact for your FHT Satisfactory Had potential impact for your FHT Good Had potential impact for your FHT Very good Had potential impact for your FHT Did not attend Question Title * Annual General Meeting (11:30 AM - 12:30 PM): Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree Did not attend AGM documents were clear & complete AGM documents were clear & complete Strongly Disagree AGM documents were clear & complete Disagree AGM documents were clear & complete Agree AGM documents were clear & complete Strongly Agree AGM documents were clear & complete Did not attend Meeting provided sufficient opportunity for discussion Meeting provided sufficient opportunity for discussion Strongly Disagree Meeting provided sufficient opportunity for discussion Disagree Meeting provided sufficient opportunity for discussion Agree Meeting provided sufficient opportunity for discussion Strongly Agree Meeting provided sufficient opportunity for discussion Did not attend Question Title * Opening Plenary - Inspirational Leadership in Primary Care – Dr. Lance Secretan For each of the program components below, rate the extent to which the session: Poor Satisfactory Good Very good Did not attend Had relevance for your work Had relevance for your work Poor Had relevance for your work Satisfactory Had relevance for your work Good Had relevance for your work Very good Had relevance for your work Did not attend Captured and maintained your interest Captured and maintained your interest Poor Captured and maintained your interest Satisfactory Captured and maintained your interest Good Captured and maintained your interest Very good Captured and maintained your interest Did not attend Had potential impact for your FHT Had potential impact for your FHT Poor Had potential impact for your FHT Satisfactory Had potential impact for your FHT Good Had potential impact for your FHT Very good Had potential impact for your FHT Did not attend Question Title * Concurrent Session A (3:00 - 3:45 PM) Please identify the session you attended (click on box to select session): A1 Reflections on Board Development A2 Enhancing the Use and Value of EMR Data in FHTs A4 CVFHT Lung League - Our journey to decreasing ER visits by 50% A5 Pulmonary Rehabilitation In Primary Care - Barrie Community Family Health Team A6 TAPESTRY – Teams Advancing Patient Experience: Strengthening Quality A7-A Unhealthy FHOs Equals an Underperforming FHT: Common Problems in FHO’s and How They Can Be Corrected to Improve FHT Performance A7-B A focus of health care reform: managing physical disabilities/complex patients in primary care A7-C Collaborating With Physicians Into Mental Health Treatment Question Title * For Concurrent Session A, please rate the extent to which the session: Poor Satisfactory Good Very good Did not attend Had relevance for your work Had relevance for your work Poor Had relevance for your work Satisfactory Had relevance for your work Good Had relevance for your work Very good Had relevance for your work Did not attend Captured and maintained your interest Captured and maintained your interest Poor Captured and maintained your interest Satisfactory Captured and maintained your interest Good Captured and maintained your interest Very good Captured and maintained your interest Did not attend Had potential impact for your FHT Had potential impact for your FHT Poor Had potential impact for your FHT Satisfactory Had potential impact for your FHT Good Had potential impact for your FHT Very good Had potential impact for your FHT Did not attend Question Title * Concurrent Session B (4:00 – 4:45 PM) Please identify the session you attended (click on box to select session): B1 Effective Governance For Quality and Patient Safety in Primary Care in Ontario B2-A FHT Data Export Systems for Chronic Disease Management and Resource Tracking – Data Quality, Data Extraction, Searches, Reports and Dashboards B2-B Toronto Western Family Health Team (TW-FHT) Patient Experience Survey B4-A PATH - Partners Advancing Transitions In Healthcare B4-B Strategies to address the social determinants of health and health equity in clinical practice B5 STOP with FHTs: Building Capacity to deliver Smoking Cessation Programming in Family Health Teams B6 Revolutionizing the Geriatric Focus in Primary Care B7 The Obesity Story? Question Title * For Concurrent Session B, please rate the extent to which the session: Poor Satisfactory Good Very good Did not attend Had relevance for your work Had relevance for your work Poor Had relevance for your work Satisfactory Had relevance for your work Good Had relevance for your work Very good Had relevance for your work Did not attend Captured and maintained your interest Captured and maintained your interest Poor Captured and maintained your interest Satisfactory Captured and maintained your interest Good Captured and maintained your interest Very good Captured and maintained your interest Did not attend Had potential impact for your FHT Had potential impact for your FHT Poor Had potential impact for your FHT Satisfactory Had potential impact for your FHT Good Had potential impact for your FHT Very good Had potential impact for your FHT Did not attend Question Title * "Bright Lights" Awards Dinner (6:00 - 8:30 PM): Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree Did not attend Was an enjoyable event Was an enjoyable event Strongly Disagree Was an enjoyable event Disagree Was an enjoyable event Agree Was an enjoyable event Strongly Agree Was an enjoyable event Did not attend Effective way to celebrate FHT achievement Effective way to celebrate FHT achievement Strongly Disagree Effective way to celebrate FHT achievement Disagree Effective way to celebrate FHT achievement Agree Effective way to celebrate FHT achievement Strongly Agree Effective way to celebrate FHT achievement Did not attend Question Title * Wednesday, October 23, 2013 Concurrent Session C (9:00 - 9:45 AM) Please identify the session you attended (click on box to select session): C1 Integrating a Critical Incident Reporting Framework into your FHT C3 System Outcomes and Linkages for Vulnerable PatiEnts (SOLVE) AND Integration: Building the team beyond the FHT C4 "Mind the Gap" - Addressing Phlebotomy in Rural Ontario: A Case Study in Partnership, Community Engagement and Grass Roots Initiative-Taking C5 The “One Stop Shop” Diabetes program: Engaging, Aligning, and Integrating interdisplinary team to create a patient-focused program C6 Ontario's Seniors Strategy: Implications and Opportunities for Primary Care Providers C7 Nurturing Collaboration in a Large, Geographically Dispersed FHT C8 Guelph HealthLink: Resurfacing an integrated Electronic Health Record (IEHR) CD2 Building a Primary Health Care Information Infrastructure: Linking and Governing Data Question Title * For Concurrent Session C, please rate the extent to which the session: Poor Satisfactory Good Very good Did not attend Had relevance for your work Had relevance for your work Poor Had relevance for your work Satisfactory Had relevance for your work Good Had relevance for your work Very good Had relevance for your work Did not attend Captured and maintained your interest Captured and maintained your interest Poor Captured and maintained your interest Satisfactory Captured and maintained your interest Good Captured and maintained your interest Very good Captured and maintained your interest Did not attend Had potential impact for your FHT Had potential impact for your FHT Poor Had potential impact for your FHT Satisfactory Had potential impact for your FHT Good Had potential impact for your FHT Very good Had potential impact for your FHT Did not attend Question Title * Concurrent Session D (10:00 - 10:45 AM) Please identify the session you attended (click on box to select session): CD2 Building a Primary Health Care Information Infrastructure: Linking and Governing Data D1 Identifying Opportunities for QI Planning in Primary Care D3 Health Links: North York Family Health Team and Guelph Family Health Team D4 Adopting a Network Approach - promoting skills and preventing duplication in multi-provider areas via networks that work D5 Outcome Measurement: Developing a culture of Measurement, Optimization and Impact at Diabetes Care Guelph D6 The University Health Network Family Health Team Falls Clinic Training Program D7 The System Navigator - the new role in the McMaster Family Health Team D8 How can I remember what FHT programs are offered? - How the EMR can help! Question Title * For Concurrent Session D, please rate the extent to which the session: Poor Satisfactory Good Very good Did not attend Had relevance for your work Had relevance for your work Poor Had relevance for your work Satisfactory Had relevance for your work Good Had relevance for your work Very good Had relevance for your work Did not attend Captured and maintained your interest Captured and maintained your interest Poor Captured and maintained your interest Satisfactory Captured and maintained your interest Good Captured and maintained your interest Very good Captured and maintained your interest Did not attend Had potential impact for your FHT Had potential impact for your FHT Poor Had potential impact for your FHT Satisfactory Had potential impact for your FHT Good Had potential impact for your FHT Very good Had potential impact for your FHT Did not attend Question Title * Concurrent Session E (11:00 - 11:45 AM) Please identify the session you attended (click on box to select session): E1 Strengthening the Leadership Triad: The critical partnership of Board Chair, Lead Physician and Executive Director E2 Using Administrative Data to Build Comprehensive Measures for Quality Improvement and Research E3 Health Links: North Perth Family Health Team and Taddle Creek Family Health Team E4 Integrated Hospice Palliative Care: Bringing Family Physicians Back into the Team E5 Sustainability versus Feasibility: lessons learned from a pilot health coaching project E6 Moving from Coordination to Integration - a Primary Care Virtual Ward to Improve Transitions in Care for Elderly E7 A Unique Interprofessional Approach to Delivering Ongoing Care to Patients with Celiac Disease in a Primary Care Setting : A Dietitian, Physician and Chaplain Collaboration E8 Personal Health Records - not so scary after all Question Title * For Concurrent Session E, please rate the extent to which the session: Poor Satisfactory Good Very good Did not attend Had relevance for your work Had relevance for your work Poor Had relevance for your work Satisfactory Had relevance for your work Good Had relevance for your work Very good Had relevance for your work Did not attend Captured and maintained your interest Captured and maintained your interest Poor Captured and maintained your interest Satisfactory Captured and maintained your interest Good Captured and maintained your interest Very good Captured and maintained your interest Did not attend Had potential impact for your FHT Had potential impact for your FHT Poor Had potential impact for your FHT Satisfactory Had potential impact for your FHT Good Had potential impact for your FHT Very good Had potential impact for your FHT Did not attend Question Title * Concurrent Session F (1:30 - 2:15 PM) Please identify the session you attended (click on box to select session): F1 Quality Improvement Plans Year 1: A Giant Step Forward F2- A EMR data extraction for QI and reporting: practical advice for FHTs on protecting patient and provider privacy F2-B Translating Data into Action F3 Equipping Ontario’s Physicians for Success in Health Links F4 Innovative Partnerships to improve patient care and address social determinants of health F5 Exercise: The missing ingredient in the FHT recipe F6 Rapid Response Nursing (RRN) Program F7 Developing Resilience in our FHT’s through Innovative Program in Mindfulness Training Question Title * For Concurrent Session F, please rate the extent to which the session: Poor Satisfactory Good Very good Did not attend Had relevance for your work Had relevance for your work Poor Had relevance for your work Satisfactory Had relevance for your work Good Had relevance for your work Very good Had relevance for your work Did not attend Captured and maintained your interest Captured and maintained your interest Poor Captured and maintained your interest Satisfactory Captured and maintained your interest Good Captured and maintained your interest Very good Captured and maintained your interest Did not attend Had potential impact for your FHT Had potential impact for your FHT Poor Had potential impact for your FHT Satisfactory Had potential impact for your FHT Good Had potential impact for your FHT Very good Had potential impact for your FHT Did not attend Question Title * Closing Plenary - “Be it resolved that health system transformation must be led by Primary Care” Please rate the extent to which the panel discussion: Poor Satisfactory Good Very good Did not attend Had relevance for your work Had relevance for your work Poor Had relevance for your work Satisfactory Had relevance for your work Good Had relevance for your work Very good Had relevance for your work Did not attend Captured and maintained your interest Captured and maintained your interest Poor Captured and maintained your interest Satisfactory Captured and maintained your interest Good Captured and maintained your interest Very good Captured and maintained your interest Did not attend Had potential impact for your FHT Had potential impact for your FHT Poor Had potential impact for your FHT Satisfactory Had potential impact for your FHT Good Had potential impact for your FHT Very good Had potential impact for your FHT Did not attend Question Title * CONFERENCE ORGANIZATION & LOGISTICS Please rate the conference overall: Poor Satisfactory Good Very good Organization of overall conference program Organization of overall conference program Poor Organization of overall conference program Satisfactory Organization of overall conference program Good Organization of overall conference program Very good Online registration process Online registration process Poor Online registration process Satisfactory Online registration process Good Online registration process Very good Suitability of day, time, length of conference Suitability of day, time, length of conference Poor Suitability of day, time, length of conference Satisfactory Suitability of day, time, length of conference Good Suitability of day, time, length of conference Very good Quality of food & beverages Quality of food & beverages Poor Quality of food & beverages Satisfactory Quality of food & beverages Good Quality of food & beverages Very good Quality of session rooms Quality of session rooms Poor Quality of session rooms Satisfactory Quality of session rooms Good Quality of session rooms Very good Quality of hotel accommodation Quality of hotel accommodation Poor Quality of hotel accommodation Satisfactory Quality of hotel accommodation Good Quality of hotel accommodation Very good Question Title * Did you perceive any degree of commercial bias in any part of the program? Yes No If yes, please describe: Question Title * What would you like to see added, continued or removed from the conference? : Added: Question Title * Continued: Question Title * Removed: Question Title * What themes, topics and speakers would you like AFHTO to consider for future conferences? Question Title * General comments: Thank you for participating! We look forward to seeing you at next year's conference on October 15-16, 2014 at the Westin Harbour Castle. If you have any questions or additional comments please e-mail info@afhto.ca or call 647-AFHTO-05 (647-234-8605) Done
