CSP 2015 Evaluation: CS19 Analytics & Big Data Survey Review & Interpretation – Panel & Audience Discussion

This evaluation form will be active until Sunday, February 22, 2015 at 12pm EST.

Question Title

* 1. Please rate the panelists' overall presentation. Please feel free to make comments about the panelists in the Comments section.

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Edward R. Jones	Edward R. Jones Excellent	Edward R. Jones Very Good	Edward R. Jones Good	Edward R. Jones Fair	Edward R. Jones Poor
Elizabeth Kolodziej	Elizabeth Kolodziej Excellent	Elizabeth Kolodziej Very Good	Elizabeth Kolodziej Good	Elizabeth Kolodziej Fair	Elizabeth Kolodziej Poor
Heath Rushing	Heath Rushing Excellent	Heath Rushing Very Good	Heath Rushing Good	Heath Rushing Fair	Heath Rushing Poor
Michael Speed	Michael Speed Excellent	Michael Speed Very Good	Michael Speed Good	Michael Speed Fair	Michael Speed Poor
Amarjot Kaur	Amarjot Kaur Excellent	Amarjot Kaur Very Good	Amarjot Kaur Good	Amarjot Kaur Fair	Amarjot Kaur Poor

Comments

Question Title

* 2. Your comments are valued and will be used to improve future sessions. Please mark your answer in the appropriate box.

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Undecided	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
Edward R. Jones was effective and engaging.	Edward R. Jones was effective and engaging. Strongly Agree	Edward R. Jones was effective and engaging. Agree	Edward R. Jones was effective and engaging. Undecided	Edward R. Jones was effective and engaging. Disagree	Edward R. Jones was effective and engaging. Strongly Disagree
Elizabeth Kolodziej was effective and engaging.	Elizabeth Kolodziej was effective and engaging. Strongly Agree	Elizabeth Kolodziej was effective and engaging. Agree	Elizabeth Kolodziej was effective and engaging. Undecided	Elizabeth Kolodziej was effective and engaging. Disagree	Elizabeth Kolodziej was effective and engaging. Strongly Disagree
Heath Rushing was effective and engaging.	Heath Rushing was effective and engaging. Strongly Agree	Heath Rushing was effective and engaging. Agree	Heath Rushing was effective and engaging. Undecided	Heath Rushing was effective and engaging. Disagree	Heath Rushing was effective and engaging. Strongly Disagree
Michael Speed was effective and engaging.	Michael Speed was effective and engaging. Strongly Agree	Michael Speed was effective and engaging. Agree	Michael Speed was effective and engaging. Undecided	Michael Speed was effective and engaging. Disagree	Michael Speed was effective and engaging. Strongly Disagree
Amarjot Kaur was effective and engaging.	Amarjot Kaur was effective and engaging. Strongly Agree	Amarjot Kaur was effective and engaging. Agree	Amarjot Kaur was effective and engaging. Undecided	Amarjot Kaur was effective and engaging. Disagree	Amarjot Kaur was effective and engaging. Strongly Disagree
The material was relevant to my work as a practicing statistician.	The material was relevant to my work as a practicing statistician. Strongly Agree	The material was relevant to my work as a practicing statistician. Agree	The material was relevant to my work as a practicing statistician. Undecided	The material was relevant to my work as a practicing statistician. Disagree	The material was relevant to my work as a practicing statistician. Strongly Disagree
This session was a good use of my time.	This session was a good use of my time. Strongly Agree	This session was a good use of my time. Agree	This session was a good use of my time. Undecided	This session was a good use of my time. Disagree	This session was a good use of my time. Strongly Disagree
I intend to use what I learned from this session on the job.	I intend to use what I learned from this session on the job. Strongly Agree	I intend to use what I learned from this session on the job. Agree	I intend to use what I learned from this session on the job. Undecided	I intend to use what I learned from this session on the job. Disagree	I intend to use what I learned from this session on the job. Strongly Disagree

Question Title

* 3. Additional Comments: