Thank you for giving feedback on the 2023 WRNN Conference in Sacremento, CA. Your feedback in essential as we plan for the next meetings as well as important information to give to NSF (the funder of the conference). Your name is only being used to ensure we have complete participation and neither your name nor individual answers will be shared with anyone besides the external evaluator, Dr. Sanlyn Buxner, from the Planetary Science Institute. Please contact Sanlyn (buxner@psi.edu) with any questions, concerns, or technical issues you have with the survey.

Thank you for your important feedback!

Question Title

* 1. Which days did you attend the conference? choose all that apply

Question Title

* 2. How many Western Regional Noyce Conferences have you attended (including this one)?

Question Title

* 3. What will your share with your peers/colleagues about what you took away from the conference?

Question Title

* 4. Regarding your overall conference experience, please rate each statement using the following scheme: 5 = “strongly agree”, 4 = “agree”, 3 = “neither agree nor disagree”, 2 = “disagree”, 1 = “strongly disagree”

  5 “strongly agree” 4 “agree” 3 “neither agree nor disagree” 2 “disagree” 1 “strongly disagree” Not applicable
There were sessions I was excited to attend during  break-out sessions.
I would have preferred more keynote or plenary sessions (and fewer break-out sessions).
The break-out sessions had sufficient variety.
I learned things in the sessions that I can use right away.
I would have preferred more unstructured time during the conference to chat informally with colleagues.
The Sheraton Grand Sacramento Hotel was a pleasant place for the conference.
The pre-conference communications and planning was handled well by the conference coordinators.
The city of Sacramento was a convenient place to have the conference.
The food accommodations were good.
The sleeping room accommodations were good.

Question Title

* 5. Regarding the new WRNN website, please rate each statement using the following scheme: 5 = “strongly agree”, 4 = “agree”, 3 = “neither agree nor disagree”, 2 = “disagree”, 1 = “strongly disagree”

  5 “strongly agree” 4 “agree” 3 “neither agree nor disagree” 2 “disagree” 1 “strongly disagree” Not applicable
I look forward to using the new WRNN website.
The new WRNN website will be useful to me.

Question Title

* 6. Things that might be improved about the conference include:

Question Title

* 7. Indicate if you are a

T