The Shelf Trial Survey

Access The Shelf trial here:

Website: https://theshelf.tv/landing#
Trial barcode/Username: Atticus_Finch_Demo_USA

Password: theshelf.tv

Thank you for taking time to fill in this online evaluation form. Your comments are vital to the process of evaluating electronic resources.

	Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Very Good	N/A
Depth of Coverage (coverage of subjects, span of years included)	Depth of Coverage (coverage of subjects, span of years included) Very Poor	Depth of Coverage (coverage of subjects, span of years included) Poor	Depth of Coverage (coverage of subjects, span of years included) Average	Depth of Coverage (coverage of subjects, span of years included) Good	Depth of Coverage (coverage of subjects, span of years included) Very Good	Depth of Coverage (coverage of subjects, span of years included) N/A
Relevance (appropriateness to library patrons)	Relevance (appropriateness to library patrons) Very Poor	Relevance (appropriateness to library patrons) Poor	Relevance (appropriateness to library patrons) Average	Relevance (appropriateness to library patrons) Good	Relevance (appropriateness to library patrons) Very Good	Relevance (appropriateness to library patrons) N/A
Comprehensiveness (number & quality of resources covered, availability of full-text)	Comprehensiveness (number & quality of resources covered, availability of full-text) Very Poor	Comprehensiveness (number & quality of resources covered, availability of full-text) Poor	Comprehensiveness (number & quality of resources covered, availability of full-text) Average	Comprehensiveness (number & quality of resources covered, availability of full-text) Good	Comprehensiveness (number & quality of resources covered, availability of full-text) Very Good	Comprehensiveness (number & quality of resources covered, availability of full-text) N/A
User Friendliness (ease of navigation, screen legibility)	User Friendliness (ease of navigation, screen legibility) Very Poor	User Friendliness (ease of navigation, screen legibility) Poor	User Friendliness (ease of navigation, screen legibility) Average	User Friendliness (ease of navigation, screen legibility) Good	User Friendliness (ease of navigation, screen legibility) Very Good	User Friendliness (ease of navigation, screen legibility) N/A
Timeliness (Update frequency, currency)	Timeliness (Update frequency, currency) Very Poor	Timeliness (Update frequency, currency) Poor	Timeliness (Update frequency, currency) Average	Timeliness (Update frequency, currency) Good	Timeliness (Update frequency, currency) Very Good	Timeliness (Update frequency, currency) N/A
Convenience (online help, printing, saving, emailing, highlighting)	Convenience (online help, printing, saving, emailing, highlighting) Very Poor	Convenience (online help, printing, saving, emailing, highlighting) Poor	Convenience (online help, printing, saving, emailing, highlighting) Average	Convenience (online help, printing, saving, emailing, highlighting) Good	Convenience (online help, printing, saving, emailing, highlighting) Very Good	Convenience (online help, printing, saving, emailing, highlighting) N/A
Access Speed (searches, downloading)	Access Speed (searches, downloading) Very Poor	Access Speed (searches, downloading) Poor	Access Speed (searches, downloading) Average	Access Speed (searches, downloading) Good	Access Speed (searches, downloading) Very Good	Access Speed (searches, downloading) N/A

Very Poor

Poor

Average

Good

Very Good

N/A

Depth of Coverage (coverage of subjects, span of years included)

Depth of Coverage (coverage of subjects, span of years included) Very Poor

Depth of Coverage (coverage of subjects, span of years included) Poor

Depth of Coverage (coverage of subjects, span of years included) Average

Depth of Coverage (coverage of subjects, span of years included) Good

Depth of Coverage (coverage of subjects, span of years included) Very Good

Depth of Coverage (coverage of subjects, span of years included) N/A

Relevance (appropriateness to library patrons)

Relevance (appropriateness to library patrons) Very Poor

Relevance (appropriateness to library patrons) Poor

Relevance (appropriateness to library patrons) Average

Relevance (appropriateness to library patrons) Good

Relevance (appropriateness to library patrons) Very Good

Relevance (appropriateness to library patrons) N/A

Comprehensiveness (number & quality of resources covered, availability of full-text)

Comprehensiveness (number & quality of resources covered, availability of full-text) Very Poor

Comprehensiveness (number & quality of resources covered, availability of full-text) Poor

Comprehensiveness (number & quality of resources covered, availability of full-text) Average

Comprehensiveness (number & quality of resources covered, availability of full-text) Good

Comprehensiveness (number & quality of resources covered, availability of full-text) Very Good

Comprehensiveness (number & quality of resources covered, availability of full-text) N/A

User Friendliness (ease of navigation, screen legibility)

User Friendliness (ease of navigation, screen legibility) Very Poor

User Friendliness (ease of navigation, screen legibility) Poor

User Friendliness (ease of navigation, screen legibility) Average

User Friendliness (ease of navigation, screen legibility) Good

User Friendliness (ease of navigation, screen legibility) Very Good

User Friendliness (ease of navigation, screen legibility) N/A

Timeliness (Update frequency, currency)

Timeliness (Update frequency, currency) Very Poor

Timeliness (Update frequency, currency) Poor

Timeliness (Update frequency, currency) Average

Timeliness (Update frequency, currency) Good

Timeliness (Update frequency, currency) Very Good

Timeliness (Update frequency, currency) N/A

Convenience (online help, printing, saving, emailing, highlighting)

Convenience (online help, printing, saving, emailing, highlighting) Very Poor

Convenience (online help, printing, saving, emailing, highlighting) Poor

Convenience (online help, printing, saving, emailing, highlighting) Average

Convenience (online help, printing, saving, emailing, highlighting) Good

Convenience (online help, printing, saving, emailing, highlighting) Very Good

Convenience (online help, printing, saving, emailing, highlighting) N/A

Access Speed (searches, downloading)

Access Speed (searches, downloading) Very Poor

Access Speed (searches, downloading) Poor

Access Speed (searches, downloading) Average

Access Speed (searches, downloading) Good

Access Speed (searches, downloading) Very Good

Access Speed (searches, downloading) N/A

The Shelf Trial Survey

The Shelf Trial Survey

Question Title

* 1. Branch or School?

Question Title

* 2. What is your position?

Question Title

* 3. What area do you work in? (Check all that apply)

Question Title

* 4. Assess the features of this resource:

Question Title

* 5. How often do you think you would use or refer this resource?

Question Title

* 6. How much did you use this resource during the trial?

Question Title

* 7. What did you like most about this resource?

Question Title

* 8. What did you like least about this resource?

Question Title

* 9. Will this resource support your work on any strategic initiatives?

Question Title

* 10. Overall recommendation:

Question Title

* 11. Other comments?