Scientists' Opinions on Publishing in Controversial Journals

We are interested in whether scientists submitting manuscripts consider the risks of publishing in controversial journals. For example, the journal Nutrients has been criticized for publishing animal experiments that violate the journal’s own ethical standards regarding animal use. Other journals, including, the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, have been completely delisted from key indexing databases such as Web of Science for failing to meet quality selection criteria, including effective peer review and adherence to ethical publishing practices.

We’d like to know what you think. This brief survey aims to gauge support for certain policy recommendations and gather insights from scientists on how a journal’s reputation impacts their decision to publish in the journal.
1.How important is it for you to publish your research in reputable journals?
2.Would you consider publishing your research in a journal with a controversial reputation?
3.Do you think having a controversial journal on your resume/CV could impact your career negatively?
4.Would you support a policy for the journal Nutrients to exclusively publish human-based, nonanimal research?
5.Which of the following aspects are most important to you when selecting a journal? (Select all that apply)
6.What is the highest degree you have earned?
7.Please provide any additional comments.
8.If you'd like to discuss this topic further, leave your contact information below.