124 - Continuous Quality Improvement in Rural Low Volume Surgical Programs • Dr. Sean Ebert
Dr. Sean Ebert
1.
Instructor’s knowledge of subject matter was appropriate
1 = Strongly Disagree
2 = Disagree
3 = Neutral
4 = Agree
5 = Strongly Agree
1 = Strongly Disagree
2 = Disagree
3 = Neutral
4 = Agree
5 = Strongly Agree
2.
Information was presented clearly
1 = Strongly Disagree
2 = Disagree
3 = Neutral
4 = Agree
5 = Strongly Agree
1 = Strongly Disagree
2 = Disagree
3 = Neutral
4 = Agree
5 = Strongly Agree
3.
Information presented was useful / met stated learning objectives
1 = Strongly Disagree
2 = Disagree
3 = Neutral
4 = Agree
5 = Strongly Agree
1 = Strongly Disagree
2 = Disagree
3 = Neutral
4 = Agree
5 = Strongly Agree
4.
Information was credible and non-biased
1 = Strongly Disagree
2 = Disagree
3 = Neutral
4 = Agree
5 = Strongly Agree
1 = Strongly Disagree
2 = Disagree
3 = Neutral
4 = Agree
5 = Strongly Agree
5.
Please indicate which CanMeds-FMS roles you feel were addressed during this educational activity - select all that apply
Family Medicine Expert
Communicator
Collaborator
Manager
Health Advocate
Scholar
Professional
6.
Did you perceive any degree of bias in any part of the program?
Yes
No
If Yes please describe
7.
Did the activity respect the Ethical Code of CME providers?
Yes
No
8.
Comments: